• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig – Butcher of the Somme?

Free essay example:

Oliver Austin                                                                  25th September 2007

Haig – Butcher of the Somme?

        Haig was appointed commander of the army on 10th of December 1915, and he had had a very successful military career. Haig decided to attack the Germans at the river Somme in 1916 to attract German soldiers from the town of Verdun where they were fighting the French and had almost broken through. But even though he was victorious there was a very high number of casualties. But does this make Field Marshall Haig "The Butcher of The Somme?”

        “Britain should be prepared for a high loss of life,” was Haig’s view on the war, and this shows that he did recognise that the nature of World War One trench warfare meant that men’s lives would be the cost of ‘victory.’ Haig did expect large casualties, but made them larger than they should have been, as the strategies he used were very outdated, and by telling his soldiers to "walk slowly in a line towards the enemy" he, unfortunately, gave the enemy machine gunners an easy target. A German soldier is quoted to have said, “No longer call it war, this is mere murder.”

        Haig also knew that the shells that were being used did not cut through the wire, but with so many resources and untrained men concentrated along this stretch of the front, there wasn’t much room for change, and plus there wasn’t a plan B anyway. Another fatal flaw in the planning was that some men had marched seven miles with a full pack, the day before the assault, so were tired, and therefore were not as useful as they could have been.

        Of course, certain facts have to be taken into consideration when deciding if Haig should be called “The Butcher of the Somme.” For instance: The force was made up of 500,000 volunteers with inadequate training, plus the British force was commanded by young officers with no experience who had risen too fast owing to the number of Junior officers lost. Also Joffre’s force at Verdun needed relief, so he was forced to attack as soon as possible, as if they waited until August the French army would cease to exist. In addition to this, Haig was pressurised into making a decision due to the soldiers’ morale, as many believed that the Somme would be a turning-point in the war, and that soldiers’ morale would be lifted.

        One overwhelming fact about the battle of the Somme, is that three lives were lost per foot of ground gained. This shows the sheer size and scale of human loss in this great Battle. Also, the taking of Delville wood cost 80,000 British troops, and taking Pozieres cost 23,000 Anzacs, which again is a huge loss.

        To an extent I do think that Haig does deserve to be nicknamed ‘Butcher of the Somme’, as there was ‘futile death due to incompetent leadership’ – there were more men lost on that day than ever before, or since then – but I do think part of the failure, was due to misfortune rather than bad planning. For instance, how can Haig be blamed for the failure of Joffre’s force at Verdun, of for the 17 tanks that failed to start on 15th September. Anyway, the battle wasn’t a complete failure, the British did eventually gain a bit of land - it just dragged on for months. Maybe the historian Richard Holmes is right – perhaps the British came out better, but the price was too high.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    They would have thought when they were surrounded by death and mud in the trenches that some people would have to be on the good end of it. We see, actually, that the generals did feel for their men, when Haig says to his wife in source 4, 'I feel quite sad'.

  2. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    Some of his battle strategies, in fact, fit the dictionary definition of butcher exactly, for instance the fact that he sent hundreds of men out each day replacing those who had just died, which is an example of killing indiscriminately (or at random, wildly).

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    It is expected that he supports the General's actions. This further contributes unreliability of this source. Haig designation of the job and the way he accomplished what was planned as a result of the battle, satisfied many people. S.Warburton asked in an article for a history magazine in 1988, 'Would there have been anyone better for the job?'

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    From other knowledge, the Battle of Somme is much more similar to the way Copppard describes it rather than Haig, though I do not blame Haig for his inaccurate report as he may have just been uninformed. How far do you agree that they have no use for the Historian studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme?

  1. Haig: Butcher or Serious Commander?

    By commenting on the 'tremendous superiority' of the BEF leading to 'inevitable defeat', he absolves himself of responsibility for failure. Although not directly mentioned, it seems very much as if Ludendorff was not satisfied with the resources (both human and material)

  2. Does Field Marshal Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher of the Somme?

    up on it and made sure that the error was corrected, instead of just leaving Rawlinson to get on with it, and allowing him to continue with his plan. To then take an even higher risk, by trying to cover more land, on a plan that he wasn't even certain

  1. Field Marshall Haig:The Butcher of the Somme?

    We do not know this. I think that with only these two sources as a back up to solve this problem it is not really possible because of the lack of information. B). Out of Sources B and C, I would trust source C more.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of The Somme'?

    There is however also a second argument to consider, that Haig was fed false, or very poor information. As source E clearly points out, the commanders spent their time a very long way away from the front, and very rarely visited it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work