• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig – Butcher of the Somme?

Free essay example:

Oliver Austin                                                                  25th September 2007

Haig – Butcher of the Somme?

        Haig was appointed commander of the army on 10th of December 1915, and he had had a very successful military career. Haig decided to attack the Germans at the river Somme in 1916 to attract German soldiers from the town of Verdun where they were fighting the French and had almost broken through. But even though he was victorious there was a very high number of casualties. But does this make Field Marshall Haig "The Butcher of The Somme?”

        “Britain should be prepared for a high loss of life,” was Haig’s view on the war, and this shows that he did recognise that the nature of World War One trench warfare meant that men’s lives would be the cost of ‘victory.’ Haig did expect large casualties, but made them larger than they should have been, as the strategies he used were very outdated, and by telling his soldiers to "walk slowly in a line towards the enemy" he, unfortunately, gave the enemy machine gunners an easy target. A German soldier is quoted to have said, “No longer call it war, this is mere murder.”

        Haig also knew that the shells that were being used did not cut through the wire, but with so many resources and untrained men concentrated along this stretch of the front, there wasn’t much room for change, and plus there wasn’t a plan B anyway. Another fatal flaw in the planning was that some men had marched seven miles with a full pack, the day before the assault, so were tired, and therefore were not as useful as they could have been.

        Of course, certain facts have to be taken into consideration when deciding if Haig should be called “The Butcher of the Somme.” For instance: The force was made up of 500,000 volunteers with inadequate training, plus the British force was commanded by young officers with no experience who had risen too fast owing to the number of Junior officers lost. Also Joffre’s force at Verdun needed relief, so he was forced to attack as soon as possible, as if they waited until August the French army would cease to exist. In addition to this, Haig was pressurised into making a decision due to the soldiers’ morale, as many believed that the Somme would be a turning-point in the war, and that soldiers’ morale would be lifted.

        One overwhelming fact about the battle of the Somme, is that three lives were lost per foot of ground gained. This shows the sheer size and scale of human loss in this great Battle. Also, the taking of Delville wood cost 80,000 British troops, and taking Pozieres cost 23,000 Anzacs, which again is a huge loss.

        To an extent I do think that Haig does deserve to be nicknamed ‘Butcher of the Somme’, as there was ‘futile death due to incompetent leadership’ – there were more men lost on that day than ever before, or since then – but I do think part of the failure, was due to misfortune rather than bad planning. For instance, how can Haig be blamed for the failure of Joffre’s force at Verdun, of for the 17 tanks that failed to start on 15th September. Anyway, the battle wasn’t a complete failure, the British did eventually gain a bit of land - it just dragged on for months. Maybe the historian Richard Holmes is right – perhaps the British came out better, but the price was too high.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    They would have thought when they were surrounded by death and mud in the trenches that some people would have to be on the good end of it. We see, actually, that the generals did feel for their men, when Haig says to his wife in source 4, 'I feel quite sad'.

  2. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    In his defence; he was advised to carry out the Big Push. On the other hand he was supposedly the best man for the job, so why would such a man need to listen to anyone's advice? He had been 'the product' of his 'education' and therefore should know what he was doing.

  1. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    could have been more flexible so as to fit most or all of the soldiers, as opposed to very few, and then less people may have been killed. He should also have thought about the fact that life in the trenches was very hard, not at all like the life

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    Source H, refers to Haig as 'one of the main architects of the allied victory' which connects to source G claim that the 'Somme had no great importance in the strategic sense; its consequences nevertheless were great, particularly as regards to moral.

  1. Was Field Marshall Haig the Butcher of the Somme

    if Haig had listened to Rawlinson and gone with the "bite and hold" plan. By doing this they would have gained lots more land and gradually would have stopped the outrageous amount of deaths that occurred per day. Even though some historians believe that Haig was a success, they also give ways in which Haig could have improved his techniques.

  2. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    I can't see how the deaths of their friends could possibly create an attacking spirit, the only thing it would create was the impression that there General was a complete maniac. There is no use in raising the morale of troops who are going to die anyway, and surely victories

  1. Field Marshall Haig:The Butcher of the Somme?

    We do not know this. I think that with only these two sources as a back up to solve this problem it is not really possible because of the lack of information. B). Out of Sources B and C, I would trust source C more.

  2. Field Marshall Haig - 'the butcher of the Somme'?

    The sources of information he received were not reliable because the people did not want to worry Haig. So they lied by reporting 'successful attack' and 'the barbed wire has never been so well cut'. Through my own knowledge, I can say that source B is not reliable because on

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work