• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

haig coursework

Extracts from this document...


1. The message of the source is that in 1916, one year before this cartoon was published; General Haig had not been present on the frontline at the Battle of the Somme. This is shown by "the absence of the General, Sir." This suggests that in 1916 many men believed that because General Haig was not with them on the frontline, the fighting they were doing was just a rehearsal. This is also shown by the Major General addressing the men and not General Haig himself. Which suggests that Haig did not want to be a part of the battle himself. Just wanted to conduct from a distance how the battle went. This refers to the fact, that in 1916, Haig was at his base 40 miles behind the frontline and never visited the frontline during the battle. This also refers to the fact that many people called him 'the Butcher' because he sent many men to their death but never in front of his own eyes. In source A the cartoonist is criticising General Haig because it suggests that during the war he never visited the font-line to see how his men were fighting "...there's a difference between rehearsal and the real thing...The absence of the general" This shows that the ...read more.


In source E it shows "expressed my doubts...cavalry could ever operate successfully on a front...miles with barbed wire and machine guns." This suggests that Lloyd George did not agree with the way Haig was planning the battle, although he did not bring this up with him, but praised him for his work. This refers to the fact that in 1916 at the Battle of the Somme Field Marshall Haig was never told the truth about how badly his plan was, only told that all was going well and the enemy were on the verge of surrendering. This also refers to the fact throughout the battle Haig stuck to his plan to send his men 'over the top' and advance towards enemy lines under heavy machine gunfire, and never once did he change it. 4. Haig wrote source F in June 1916, just before the battle of the Somme, because he was preparing for the 'war of attrition'. This is shown by "...no amount of skill...no amount of training...no amount of superiouty of arms or ammunition...will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives." This suggests that Haig knows there will be many losses during the battle and people must come to terms with this fact. ...read more.


This suggests that Haig did not know that his plan was not working as smoothly as it should have and kept to the same tactics thinking that they were in fact working. Source E supports this statement because it shows hw old Haig's tactics actually were and that they were more than likely to fail. This is shown by 'I drove through squadrons of cavalry' this suggests that when Haig fought in wars he was used to there being cavalry and saw this as the best way to win, this being why he used them himself in the Battle of the Somme. Source F supports the statement because Haig writes about how they will have to be losses to win and that he does not seem to care how many of his own men die as ling as he wins the battle. This is shown by 'No amount of skill...no training...no superiority of arms and ammunition...will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives.' This suggests that Haig believes that only way to win the battle is to sacrifice his men. This refers to the fact that on the first day of the battle there were 60,000 allies dead or wounded, but Haig was told the Germans were on the verge of surrendering. This also refers to the fact that ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Battle of Verdun.

    appear otherwise ' By any reasonable standard the Germans had won at the point that they wound down the offensive' but a major weakness of this viewpoint and of the source is his lack of evidence. From my own knowledge I know that there was a lot of propaganda used

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    It is therefore possible that Haig did care for the lives of his men, but was forced with the dilemma that he had to kill many of his own men to end the war and prevent more deaths. However, the British public would not have liked the idea of the

  1. Study Sources A & B. How far does A prove that Haig did not ...

    happened in favour of the Germans, whereas with the advantage of a number of different historical resources and hindsight we know this not to be true (Britain in fact incurred 60,000 casualties in the first day). Haig had indeed lied about, or over exaggerated, the true achievements of the British

  2. World War I Coursework

    This meant that the Allies could launch a counter-offensive. The Germans were pushed off the Hindenburg Line and the Allies won the war. Russia pulling out of the war was an important turning point in the war because it meant that the Germans could launch the Spring Offensive which became

  1. History Sourcework- Field Marshal Haig Final

    Firstly it has its strength, as Lloyd George would have known Haig extremely well due to frequent meetings, giving George a strong indication of how Haig was fighting the war and what he was like. However, their relationship weakens the source.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    This is very dangerous, as he becomes a target for enemy snipers. Examining the photo further it can be seem that the barbed wire is on the opposite side of the trench along with the fire step. The only explanation is that the British had captured the trench, which means

  1. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    Allied commanders had already drawn up military campaign plans for 1919. The US entry was caused partly by the U-boat campaign, and also by the discovery that Germany was trying to persuade Mexico to declare war on the USA, promising them Texas, New Mexico and Arizona in return.

  2. Does General Douglas Haig deserve his reputation of being the Butcher of the Somme?

    These tactics were again used in the Battle of Passchendaele showing that General Douglas Haig did not change and deserves the reputation. This shows that he being foolish and not using his sources to full potential led him to make decisions which killed tons of men on the first day.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work