• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig Fully Deserves His Reputation as 'Bungler and Butcher of the Somme.'Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Haig Fully Deserves His Reputation as 'Bungler and Butcher of the Somme.' Explain how far you agree With this statement. Haig is one of the most controversial figures in world war one and the last century. Many think of his him as a national hero, where as others think of him a blundering fool who was not fit to lead an army. There is one thing that is not disputed though and this is the fact that he led 60,000 men to their deaths in the first few hours of the battle of the Somme this horrific especially considering the little land he gained. The reason why Haig has a reputation as the 'Bungler and Butcher of the Somme' because of the fact that he seemed totally impassionate about the lives that had been lost. This is the reason why he had a reputation as a butcher. A source that suggests this is: " The nation must be taught to bear losses. No amount of skill on part of the higher commanders, no training, however good, on the part of the officers and the men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great will enable victories to be won with sacrifice of lives. The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualties lists." This quote is from Sir Douglas Haig and was given before the battle of the Somme. This suggests that he was a butcher as he is saying that it doesn't matter that the allied armies have any superiority the inevitable fact of the matter is lives will be lost. ...read more.

Middle

But it also could suggest that the information Haig was getting was wrong. This then either suggests that he was a bungler as his sources communication weren't as good as they should have been. This would have been corrected if he was actually on the front line seeing what was happening. But then if he was on the front line it would have been extremely difficult for him to command the western front as a whole because of this he can be viewed as a bungler. It would have taken an extremely skilled commander to be able to take command of a large army spread out across a long distance and be able to command the army from one point of the front. So this suggests that he had incorrect information relayed back to him. Another source that helps support that he was a butcher and a bungler is: "Haig was as stubborn as a donkey and as unthinking as a donkey. The principle that guided him was if he could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then he would at some time win the war. This is an appalling kind of strategy at all, it's slaughter. The Somme was criminal negligence. He had no chance of a break through but still he men to their deaths." From a book called 'British Butchers and Bunglers of the World War' and it was wrote by John Laffin. ...read more.

Conclusion

"If the battle of the Somme had no great importance in the strategic sense, its consequences nevertheless were great, particularly as regards morale. It gave the Western Powers confidence. Their armies had accomplished an achievement that gave good promise for the future. The confidence if the German troops in victory was no longer as great as before. A great part of the best, most experienced and most reliable officers and men were no longer in their places. This was the more marked as the heavy losses made it necessary to send to the front a great number of young soldiers whose training was poor." This shows that the battle of the Somme was not a total disaster as something was achieved in the battle of the Somme. What was achieved was that the German's most experienced and best troops were killed and had to be replaced by younger more inexperienced troops. Also the morale of the German troops was drastically changed from being high going to low. But I don't think that Haig intended it as much as to gain territory. I think that it was caused as a consequence of Haig trying to capture more territory. Overall I think that it is unfair to label anyone as a 'butcher and bungler' including Haig. Although that death of soldiers is inevitable in war I think that no matter what the number casualties suffered cannot be justified even though some progress was made towards winning the war. Overall I think that Haig was more of a 'Bungler' that anything else. Ricky Dhaliwal ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    There is one point that is supported from all sources, being the fact that he always stayed behind the line ('he lived almost 50 kilometres behind the line', source 3), and knew nothing of trench warfare. 'He lived almost 50 kilometres behind the line', says source 3 and 'I don't think he knew what a trench was like'.

  2. Haig, Butcher of the Somme

    The historian John Laffin puts forward in his book, quoted in source 8, that Haig and other British generals were not just making mistakes, but were committing 'wilful blunders and wicked butchery' for which 'there can never be forgiveness'. As a historian he should have analysed many different sources regarding

  1. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    He did not regret any of his decisions, and said 'the nation must be prepared to bear losses, no amount of skill on the part of the higher command...' No amount of skill would have saved a Tommy when ordered to walk towards blazing machine guns.

  2. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    However being Pals Battalions, their deaths and wounding don't necessarily mean it was done by the oppositions, so if could be seen as Haig's fault; but could have happened through other circumstances, such as the act of help for other family and friends hardship.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    that for all these ships to be picking up a hundred or so, there must have been some organization in the whole process. We do not know whether this took place on the beaches or the harbour, I'm sure if this was the harbour; the allies would have been less under fire and more orderly.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    This made even normal communication difficult, but during a battle it became almost impossible for a general to "rearrange his forces in the middle of an action." Therefore it was unlikely that once a battle had started, anything could be done about its outcome.

  1. Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

    state that he was living in, a good life away from the field and how he wouldn't of known of the conditions out on the field. That's why he made foolish accusations about how he was going to attack the Germans.

  2. Free essay

    History why did the british lose so amny lives at the somme

    even thought there was heavy German artillery and they were waiting there to use their machine guns to annihilate the British as they walked over in a horizontal line. Source D6 tells us it was a vigorous attack by the British and also that there was a huge bombardment of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work