• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig- Question B

Extracts from this document...


Field Marshall Haig: "The Butcher Of The Somme" Study Sources B and C. Which one of these two Sources do you trust more? Both Sources have something in them of which can be trusted, Source B claims that the men and in "splendid spirits" which most of them probably were, as the battle had been made out like it was going to be an easy victory. Source C can be trusted because the battle turned out to be a disaster, Private George Coppard claims that the "Hundreds of dead were strung out on the barbed wire" which is very believable because the barbed wire hadn't been cut well. ...read more.


Haig's idea of what the battle had gone like could have been twisted for the better by messengers reporting back to him, 40 miles behind the front line, as many would not like to anger him. Haig being so far away from the front line wouldn't have given him a clear out look on the battle, being so far away. Source B could be trusted due to the fact that a lot of the soldiers would have been in a positive frame of mind before the attack, when Haig claims that all the men are in "splendid spirits", many of the men thought it would have been an easy victory, after 7 days of constant shelling on German front lines the soldiers expected most of them to be dead. ...read more.


Coppard would also have nothing to lie about, unlike Haig who would have to carry the weight of defeat on his shoulders, so Coppard wouldn't have to lie. Although, Source C could be deemed untrustworthy as George Coppard wrote this many years after the battle, so his memory may have been blurred, as only the negative points on the battle would have stayed in his memory. He may also have been exposed to other negative extracts about the battle, changing his opinion. Coppard thought in a 'Pals Battalion', so he may be bitter over the loss of fallen friends, he may also have been pressured to make the account more interesting. Source C is likely a more trustworthy Source, although both Sources B and C are trustworthy to some extent. However limitation makes it unable to completely trust either Source completely. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    A stalemate, such as the campaign had been intended to avoid, spread across the Peninsula and the frustrations of trench warfare were soon made worse by widespread sickness, monotonous food, trying weather and putrefying corpses. With few options remaining but to dig in for a difficult winter, in October the British government began to consider the need for evacuation.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    It seems to contain some patriotic exaggeration and may have been used as self-publicity to boost Churchill's reputation. Yet from what is said, this speech was made to his ministers so it should really contain the real truth. Another source that makes very clear references to the spirit of Britain

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work