• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig - source based questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HAIG Sources A,B,C are valuable in different ways some have comical and some have serious meanings. secondary sources, source A is from the British magazine called Punch which reported on the news at the time in a humorous manner. The source contains an image that shows a Major General addressing the men before practising an attack. He says, " I want you to understand that there is a difference between a rehearsal and the real thing. There are three essential differences: first the absence of the enemy now" turning to the Regimental Major " what is the second difference?" the Regimental Major reply's " the absence of the General ,sir." This show unrest in the ranks. This source tells us that the difference between a rehearsal and the real thing is the absence of an enemy and the absence of the general. This has some truth because around that time some people would say that the army where "LIONS LEAD BY DONKEYS". Which also comments on the general's behaviour commanding the front deep in safety miles away being in essence cowards (donkeys). This source in conclusion would be useful to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers towards their commanders. ...read more.

Middle

This would have been added to a news paper as a compassion to what other people view of Haig would have been. Most viewed Haig as a callous and uncaring man. I believe that Haig was in a difficult position and the only option would have been to shell them to death but then would have to send men other top. It not as if It was just English men that died many other races suffered many loses. The overall tactic of the war was flawed not just the generals. When it was realised that you could not win a war with just numbers the unnecessary deaths stopped. This source is useful for several reasons because is shows a different view and also shows how biased different sources can be. This is understandable when so much death occurs people want a person to blame when you can not blame one man for a countries choice. Question 2 Sir Douglas Haig who many regard as the man who sent many men to there death is still recognised as the person that help the war greatly and served his country well. John Keggan Suggests that Haig was a "an efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First ...read more.

Conclusion

He help to win a war for Queen And Country Which he was to do until " it became clear that he could not attain his objectives by continuing the offensive" David Lloyd George Source G Source K contains my view that you can not blame Haig for the war that is to much for one man he was a product of his time and military experience. if he would have been replaced would it have been better. Both sides were not ready to face each other in war using old tactics in a war were people could be killed like flies. Haig was used to house back rifles not tanks and canons. In conclusion there is a lot of evidence to show that Haig was a highly skilled and solider. Source k does not support this but does give the fair and most no biased account of Haig. I think Keegans interpretation of Haig is slightly optimistic but I don't believe that it would have been any better with another commander. There is a lot of evidence to show that his ranks were unsettled but I think that the situation not dislike of Haig. In the end a number of mistakes made by many people contributed to the half a million causalities suffered by the allies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Britain And The Western Front - Sources Questions

    over 66lbs per man, which hampered their movement considerably leaving them only able to advance at a slow walk.

  2. Evacuation during WWII - source based questions.

    This would have made the evacuees upset than they already were, as they now would have realised that they are leaving for sure, without their mothers. The big disadvantage of this source is that it was recorded in 1988, over four decades later.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Most of the soldiers at Passchendaele were conscripts, so were not enthusiastic about fighting, neither were they well trained. In fact, they were very badly trained. Ypres was strategically much more important then anything else that happened in the war because if the Germans got control of it they would gain controls the channel ports Ostende and Zebrugge.

  2. Gallipoli Questions

    As we can see from the map, to gain control of the Dardanelles from being dropped off would involve around 100km walking, and at the same time dealing with attacks from the Turks. Had the plan been executed swiftly it would have succeeded I think.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    to be what women were intended to do, having this was seen to be all a woman needed to be fulfilled. The reason she may be attributing the suffragettes' 'discontented' nature and their campaigning to is not being able to get a man.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    He also mentions Naval officers shooting their revolvers to gain order and soldiers fighting for boats in a mass fright. There is not even an element of victory in his words, but there is not even the famous Dunkirk spirit that is recalled by even the most negative sources.

  1. Source based questions on Haig.

    He knew that heavy casualties were going to be lost, but this doesn't mean he did not care about the lives of his men. Haig also genuinely thought his men were doing well, as we can see in source b: 'Very successful attack this morning.

  2. Field Marshal Haig - source based answers.

    Haig is either lying in his report or is being lied to by his officers who are too scared to tell him any different. Haig trusts his commanders and therefore believes their words. In these two extracts of source b he appears to care more for the men's lives and the way they feel.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work