• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig - source based questions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HAIG Sources A,B,C are valuable in different ways some have comical and some have serious meanings. secondary sources, source A is from the British magazine called Punch which reported on the news at the time in a humorous manner. The source contains an image that shows a Major General addressing the men before practising an attack. He says, " I want you to understand that there is a difference between a rehearsal and the real thing. There are three essential differences: first the absence of the enemy now" turning to the Regimental Major " what is the second difference?" the Regimental Major reply's " the absence of the General ,sir." This show unrest in the ranks. This source tells us that the difference between a rehearsal and the real thing is the absence of an enemy and the absence of the general. This has some truth because around that time some people would say that the army where "LIONS LEAD BY DONKEYS". Which also comments on the general's behaviour commanding the front deep in safety miles away being in essence cowards (donkeys). This source in conclusion would be useful to an historian studying the attitudes of British soldiers towards their commanders. ...read more.

Middle

This would have been added to a news paper as a compassion to what other people view of Haig would have been. Most viewed Haig as a callous and uncaring man. I believe that Haig was in a difficult position and the only option would have been to shell them to death but then would have to send men other top. It not as if It was just English men that died many other races suffered many loses. The overall tactic of the war was flawed not just the generals. When it was realised that you could not win a war with just numbers the unnecessary deaths stopped. This source is useful for several reasons because is shows a different view and also shows how biased different sources can be. This is understandable when so much death occurs people want a person to blame when you can not blame one man for a countries choice. Question 2 Sir Douglas Haig who many regard as the man who sent many men to there death is still recognised as the person that help the war greatly and served his country well. John Keggan Suggests that Haig was a "an efficient and highly skilled soldier who did much to lead Britain to victory in the First ...read more.

Conclusion

He help to win a war for Queen And Country Which he was to do until " it became clear that he could not attain his objectives by continuing the offensive" David Lloyd George Source G Source K contains my view that you can not blame Haig for the war that is to much for one man he was a product of his time and military experience. if he would have been replaced would it have been better. Both sides were not ready to face each other in war using old tactics in a war were people could be killed like flies. Haig was used to house back rifles not tanks and canons. In conclusion there is a lot of evidence to show that Haig was a highly skilled and solider. Source k does not support this but does give the fair and most no biased account of Haig. I think Keegans interpretation of Haig is slightly optimistic but I don't believe that it would have been any better with another commander. There is a lot of evidence to show that his ranks were unsettled but I think that the situation not dislike of Haig. In the end a number of mistakes made by many people contributed to the half a million causalities suffered by the allies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Britain And The Western Front - Sources Questions

    over 66lbs per man, which hampered their movement considerably leaving them only able to advance at a slow walk.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    A preliminary battle at Messines set the stage for the main attacks (July 31-November 10) at Ypres, the so-called Third Battle of Ypres or Passchendaele campaign. Desperate fighting, in which each side suffered approximately 250,000 casualties, did not result in a breakthrough.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    This self-contradiction makes it biased but its obvious he used these glamorous images to boost his post-war elections that he so much wanted. This is still however a well informed, near enough primary source. If Dunkirk were a true victory, the evacuation of all these troops would have to be quite organized and calm.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    governmental mishandling of the war time economy for the strains on the economy, and not the naval blockade.

  1. Evacuation during WWII - source based questions.

    This would have made the evacuees upset than they already were, as they now would have realised that they are leaving for sure, without their mothers. The big disadvantage of this source is that it was recorded in 1988, over four decades later.

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    The language used to describe the women in both sources is similar; shrill cry, and shrieking sister. These show how, the suffragettes (in the case of source B), and women in general (in the case of source C) are being childish in their campaign for women's suffrage (shrieking and shrill are words that might be used to describe children).

  1. Field Marshal Haig - source based answers.

    The second extract of source B is from the first day of the attack. We know from our own knowledge that the first day alone saw over 60,000 lives lost. But in the opening of this extract Haig says that the attack went like clockwork and that the Germans were surrendering freely this is far from the truth.

  2. Field Marshall Haig - Source based Questions.

    The offensive did not go like clockwork because the majority of soldiers realised that the barbed wire had not been cut at all once they got to the enemy trenches. The Germans were short of men but they were certainly not surrendering as many of them were posted in machine

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work