• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig - Source related work.

Extracts from this document...


How far does source A prove that Haig did not care about the live of his men? [7 marks] Source A is an extract from a diary entry written by Sir Earl Douglas Haig (Commander of the Battle of the Somme) in July 1916. As a result of this source A is a primary source as it was written at the time. The source is all about the death toll that Britain would be expecting. The source shows different ways to see Haig's intentions. One views him as a cold hearted man trying to kill innocent men by putting them into war and another shows him trying to win the war for Britain. The latter is evident in source A when it is said, "The Nation must be taught to bear losses" thus showing that Haig was expecting a lot of casualties. Source A cannot be totally useful in proving whether Sir Earl Douglas Haig cared about the lives of his men, since the source is only a small extract from a much larger diary entry. ...read more.


This can be seen as a fatalistic attitude as it could reduce Haig to not really making an effort to secure the position of his men and thus endangering the lives of his men. So unknowingly he could be seen as not caring for his men, but rather trying to appease the nation. One must understand that both sources have their limitations. From wider reading one knows that in source B where Haig mentions, "The men are in splendid spirits" is the only extract written by Haig, which mentions the morale of the soldiers, this leads us to the intriguing question of what is so different about the extract. Source B differs from other extracts that are typical of the time. All other Haig's Diary entries (Britain and the great war- John Murray 1994) do not mention the morale of his men and in retrospect we know that source B contradicts other reliable sources about what is written about the outcome of the first battle. We now know that 60,000 men died or were injured in the first few hours. ...read more.


Firstly, if it was addressed to the public whereby his men would be aware of his thoughts and concerns, it could be depicted that he did not care about his men. We can deduce this because if his men knew that their Commander's attitude and belief towards them was so low it would significantly affect their morale. Secondly if it was just for the attention of the Commander himself and a few other elite members (other Generals) it would not come to be known by the army officers themselves. In this instance it can be simply seen as Haig being realistic and keeping all his options open. Undoubtly there will be casualties in war and it is the job of the governing bodies to appease the people of the nation, since in war you need the people of the nation to be on your side, hence resulting in what Haig says in source B. So in conclusion the answer is that source A can only be used as evidence against him but not to prove that he did not care about the lives of his men. Helalur Rahman Khan 3894 10548 Stepney Green School ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Use sources and your own knowledge to explain your answer. Evacuation was introduced because Britain was at war with Germany and they expected the Germans to bomb Britain. There were three main evacuation periods. The first started on September 1st 1939 and was called 'The Phoney War'; this first wave of evacuation took place because Britain expected air raids.

  2. The Somme - source related study.

    However this information wasn't used. General Rawlinson always thought that the bombardment would do the soldier's job for them, however patrols were sent out in to no-man's land during night raid, and they reported that the German barbed wire wasn't being cut, as was planned.

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    I think that this source is a bit extreme, but is reliable and should be considered by historians when studying Haig and the Battle of the Somme. (d) Study sources F, G and H. Do sources G and H prove that source F is wrong?

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    Both hint that their must be a reason why suffragettes have time to campaign for suffrage, they cannot get a man or they are letting their family lives deteriorate. Altogether yes, Source B does support C's evidence. 3. Study sources D and E and use your own knowledge Why, despite

  1. South Africa - source related study

    This source tells us of how what happened in words. It gives a very good picture of what was happening at that time. And it gives you lots of different types of information. Unlike Source G which is a picture.

  2. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    Aside from maintaining awareness from the opposition, his troops would die aimlessly and achieve no progress whatsoever. This shows that Haig had limited strategic ideas and was not one for logical thinking. The comment regarding the drinks cabinet in source C also further emphasises Haig's obvious detachment from the men.

  1. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    As a result of this large expenditure, taxes were raised and so the Liberal Government was not popular in the (mainly Conservative) House of Lords. This meant a general election in 1910 had to be won by a majority to stay in power, and votes for women was not a popular policy in general.

  2. Source based work on Haig.

    Source C is an article from The Daily Telegraph newspaper written by Earl Haig, the son of Field Marshall Haig. My expectation of this source was that it would be extremely biased as it was quoting Haig's son. From studying the source I can see that my expectation was correct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work