• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason.' How far do these sources support this view?

Extracts from this document...


Question 6 Shannon Phillips 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason.' How far do these sources support this view? I think that sources A, C, D, F, G and J all claim that Haig sacrificed his men for no good reason. Source A was written by Haig in June 1916. I think that even though Haig wrote this himself it shows that he is cold hearted and would actually sacrifice his men for no good reason because he says, "The nation must be taught to bear losses." This quote shows that he is preparing the nation for what is to come. "No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no training, however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives." I think by writing this he is saying to the nation that if they want victory then the sacrifice of men's lives are crucial. If Haig could have come up with a good plan then he wouldn't of had to sacrifice as many of his men's life, but he must not have been bothered about a good plan so in other words source a shows that he was ready to sacrifice his men's lives for no good reason. ...read more.


"It was clear that there were no gaps in the wire at the time of the attack. The Germans must have been reinforcing the wire for months. It was so thick that daylight could barely be seen through it. How did the planners imagine that Tommies would get through the wire?" this shows that the Germans had made loads of planning but the British mustn't have as the planners would have thought of a 'what if the wire is to thick? Plan'. "any Tommie could have told them that shell fire lifts wire up and drops it down, often in a worse tangle than before." This shows that our men haven't been trained properly or else we wouldn't be using shell fire. This in my eyes shows that Haig sacrificed the lives of his men for no good reason or else he would have given them good training and hired someone to think up of a good plan instead of just sending his men out to kill as many Germans as they can without a plan. Source J is Lloyd George in his memoirs, written in the 1930's. "when the Battle of the Somme was being fought, I travelled the front of Verdun to Ypres. I drove through squadrons of cavalry. ...read more.


Source I was Lloyd George writing to Haig on 21st of September, 1916, after visiting the battlefield. Lloyd George was secretary for war at the time of the Somme. "I can say that the heartening news of the last few days has confirmed our hopes that the tide has now definitely turned in our favour. I congratulate you most warmly on the skill with which your plans were laid." This source also seems like a source that you can trust as it is written by Lloyd George himself. At the end of the source it says 'I congratulate you most warmly......' well in other sources it is showing that Haig didn't make any good plans for the battle. The sources that I have picked that are for Haig show that Haig sacrificed the lives of his men for a good reason, but 1 of the 3 I think is just propaganda. I think that source E doesn't really take a side as it just tells you that the General doesn't attend a real attack, which is slightly more against Haig than for Haig. In my conclusion I think that Haig did sacrifice the live of his men for no good reason because there are more sources against Haig than for Haig and because of the points that I have stated above. Shannon Phillips ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    His men, however, returned to bankruptcy and unemployment. The former soldiers would have viewed that as both they, and Haig participated in the victory over Germany, it was unfair of the awarders to remunerate Haig alone, and condemn them to poverty. Even if he was eventually a war winning general, those who 'really did the job' should have taken as much credit as Haig did.

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    However, this agreement only lasted for nine months and, although the unions were pleased that miners would not have to take wage reductions, they knew that once the subsidies ended they would be in the same position as before. They also saw this as the government giving in to the

  1. Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no ...

    like casualty figures and reports, so we know he had a good knowledge of what happened at the battle, and therefore the source is quite trustworthy. On the other hand, it doesn't agree with the statement as it says they couldn't have known about the German wires and he says,

  2. General Haig

    It is still quite useful though as it does entirely back John Keegan's view on General Haig because it shows that people who fought in the war never criticised General Haig and it is in more modern times people believe that General Haig was a bad person in the world of the British military.

  1. Haig in sources

    about what it was like for the soldiers attacking over no-mans-land on the first day of the Somme but I think Source H is a more useful source as evidence. Source H informs us of a soldiers account from what happened as his Pal Battalion went over the top onto no-mans-land.

  2. "Haig was an uncaring generalwho sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good ...

    It was not meant for public eyes. "The men are in splendid spirits" This sentence tells us that the higher commanders were in good spirits and he had been informed that the men in the trenches themselves were also very confident.

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    view point of the producers of the programme and not the view of the Public. Although some characters such as Captain Darling are portrayed as being a bit of an idiot other officers such as Captain Blackadder are shown as 'good' characters which could mean the programme doesnot contain to much bias although a little may be present.

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    the disaster but it was not their fault but of the fault of the experienced leaders like Haig who were not willing to join in the fighting. These sources increase my understanding as to why so many historians argue that leaders like Haig were incompetent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work