• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason.' How far do these sources support this view?

Extracts from this document...


Question 6 Shannon Phillips 'Haig was an uncaring general who sacrificed the lives of his soldiers for no good reason.' How far do these sources support this view? I think that sources A, C, D, F, G and J all claim that Haig sacrificed his men for no good reason. Source A was written by Haig in June 1916. I think that even though Haig wrote this himself it shows that he is cold hearted and would actually sacrifice his men for no good reason because he says, "The nation must be taught to bear losses." This quote shows that he is preparing the nation for what is to come. "No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders, no training, however good, on the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifice of men's lives." I think by writing this he is saying to the nation that if they want victory then the sacrifice of men's lives are crucial. If Haig could have come up with a good plan then he wouldn't of had to sacrifice as many of his men's life, but he must not have been bothered about a good plan so in other words source a shows that he was ready to sacrifice his men's lives for no good reason. ...read more.


"It was clear that there were no gaps in the wire at the time of the attack. The Germans must have been reinforcing the wire for months. It was so thick that daylight could barely be seen through it. How did the planners imagine that Tommies would get through the wire?" this shows that the Germans had made loads of planning but the British mustn't have as the planners would have thought of a 'what if the wire is to thick? Plan'. "any Tommie could have told them that shell fire lifts wire up and drops it down, often in a worse tangle than before." This shows that our men haven't been trained properly or else we wouldn't be using shell fire. This in my eyes shows that Haig sacrificed the lives of his men for no good reason or else he would have given them good training and hired someone to think up of a good plan instead of just sending his men out to kill as many Germans as they can without a plan. Source J is Lloyd George in his memoirs, written in the 1930's. "when the Battle of the Somme was being fought, I travelled the front of Verdun to Ypres. I drove through squadrons of cavalry. ...read more.


Source I was Lloyd George writing to Haig on 21st of September, 1916, after visiting the battlefield. Lloyd George was secretary for war at the time of the Somme. "I can say that the heartening news of the last few days has confirmed our hopes that the tide has now definitely turned in our favour. I congratulate you most warmly on the skill with which your plans were laid." This source also seems like a source that you can trust as it is written by Lloyd George himself. At the end of the source it says 'I congratulate you most warmly......' well in other sources it is showing that Haig didn't make any good plans for the battle. The sources that I have picked that are for Haig show that Haig sacrificed the lives of his men for a good reason, but 1 of the 3 I think is just propaganda. I think that source E doesn't really take a side as it just tells you that the General doesn't attend a real attack, which is slightly more against Haig than for Haig. In my conclusion I think that Haig did sacrifice the live of his men for no good reason because there are more sources against Haig than for Haig and because of the points that I have stated above. Shannon Phillips ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    His men, however, returned to bankruptcy and unemployment. The former soldiers would have viewed that as both they, and Haig participated in the victory over Germany, it was unfair of the awarders to remunerate Haig alone, and condemn them to poverty. Even if he was eventually a war winning general, those who 'really did the job' should have taken as much credit as Haig did.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    However, the blockade and Haig's 'wearing down' tactics worked well together. The shortage of food and other supplies became so great in Germany it led to a state of civil war, which eventually led to surrender. The battle of Ypres was strategically very important because if the Germans got control

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    When attacks were made they were often disastrous and the attacking force simply ended up retreating back to their original position with a significant amount of casualties. Preparation was poor and the objective among the troops was sometimes not clear, troops had to carry very heavy packs making it very difficult to move quickly and dodge machine gun fire.

  2. Study all Sources - 'Haig was an uncaring General who sacrificed the lives of ...

    Haig was one of the maim architects of the allied victory." This in some cases is true as the last 100 days of the war the BEF defeated the German army on the western front. Also Haig did help the French from the Germans from the attack of Verdun as

  1. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    The Conservative government now had reason to believe that the unions were not only a threat to the Constitution, but were also working to bring socialism to Britain through syndicalism. When, on 30th June 1925, the mine owners gave a month's notice that there would be a further wage cut

  2. How Far was Haig responsible for the failings of the British War effort on ...

    The shells which were bombarding the Germans were of a poor quality. Haig could not have known this in advance. The plans which were made for the attack were primarily not his, they were devised by the French and he inherited them. He would have preferred an attack further north.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    it was Haig who suggested to the King that French was "a source of great weakness to the army, and no-one had any confidence in him anymore." He then suggested that he himself was ready to do the duty in any capacity, obviously meaning as commander in chief.

  2. General Haig doesn't care about his soldiers.

    Whereas the actually events and the events described in source C by a private who was fighting in the battle are the complete opposite. " How did the planners imagine that Tommies would get through the wire?" Also Haig says in his report that the "barbed wire has never been so well cut."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work