• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Haig was quite successful in the years 1917-1918 because during these years Haig led the British soldiers to victory. He did this in a number of ways. These are some of them.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

General Haig Coursework Question D5 Haig was quite successful in the years 1917-1918 because during these years Haig led the British soldiers to victory. He did this in a number of ways. These are some of them. The only real success of the Nivelle Offensive was for the Canadian troops, who were fighting at Vimy Ridge. They had managed to secretly bring lots of men to the front line trenches using underground tunnels. When they attacked they took the Germans by surprise and managed to successfully gain the ridge with few casualties. Nearby, British troops stormed Arras. It started with a huge artillery barrage. It was much more accurate than the one on the Somme. Haig had ordered his commanders to include 'ruses', such as stopping for a while, in the bombardment. This is when you stop the bombardment so that the enemy would come out of their dugouts, then starting again suddenly to kill as many Germans as possible. ...read more.

Middle

The attack included 400 tanks. Hundreds of Allied planes also attacked the enemy with their machine guns and dropped ammunition and food to advancing troops. On this one day the British Army advanced 8 up to miles. As the offensive continued the German army began to crumble. The troops were dispirited. The German army was now to weak to hold back the Allies. Haigs' earlier policy of 'attrition' had now been fulfilled. However the Germans weren't defeated yet, they were inflicting heavy casualties on the advancing Allies. The Germans were also falling back on the 'Hindenburg Line' of defences. In September British troops attacked the Hindenburg Line. In two days the artillery, tanks and infantry created a 12-mile wide hole in the Hindenburg Line. This was a major success for Haig and the British Army. General Haig was unsuccessful during the years of 1917-1918 because he lost or the advantage was to the Germans in the majority of the battles. ...read more.

Conclusion

An attack on Flanders would also stop the Germans attacking the French in the south. Like the Somme Haig didn't mind how much land was gained, he believed it would contribute to the 'wearing down' of the Germans Army. The land in Flanders is very low-lying and floods easily; this is why the attack was planned for July. Shortly before the attack it rained very heavily. The land turned to mud. Haig still decided to press on with the attack. The artillery bombardment lasted two weeks. It turned the battlefield into a sticky mess; in some places the mud was twenty feet deep. The British soldiers found it difficult to wade through the mud, some even drowned. Tanks were also sent into the battle, they found it impossible to operate in the mud. On the other hand the rain made it difficult for the Germans to defend. Their trenches flooded and collapsed. The Germans still resisted. British progress was extremely slow. There were huge casualties on both sides and little ground was gained. Ziggy Niblett ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Suffragettes : A war with a 98% victory

    I fear only one possibility, a policeman. It is my fear. "We've had enough of you Suffragettes. You are vandalising London. Your friends have had their fair share of warnings, so now you can have the privilege of being one of the first few of your kind staying the night in a cell.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    However, his book again is not specifically on Dunkirk therefore he may leave out important fact and the details of the evacuation may not be very thorough. Source 22. The source says that Dunkirk was a step forward to the defeat of Hitler's army.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The British Grand Fleet had created a blockade of German ports. This cut of the German supplies coming in from other countries. This was only a small concern for the Germans at first as they had plenty of supplies, resources and ammunition.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    In this source he says that they were victorious but only because of the German tanks halting. He says that they saved 340,000 men, including 139,000 French, were taken by a swarm of boats, but he does not mention the types of the boats.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    After many of Churchill's inspiring and patriotic speeches, his letters to General Weygand revealed the truth behind Dunkirk. He mentions how six troop-filled ships were sunk by German bombing. Keeping in mind that a ship could hold near a 1000 troops, that is up to 6000 men killed in one bombing session.

  2. Why was fighting on the Western Front such a new and terrible experience for ...

    unison to raid the remaining survivors only to discover that the trenches and barbed wire were still intact and the Germans had not even one casualty whilst under the safety of their secure dugouts. They were ambushed and suffered heavy losses.

  1. The Third Battle of Ypres

    It was not a shower but a steady soaking downpour. Haig however, encouraged by the three successes, ignored the rain and decided to make a further attempt to break the Germans on the Ridge, even alerting the cavalry to be ready to follow up!

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    This is more evidence to say that the generals were incompetent and were unable to fight a war with these new technical advances. Sir Douglas Haig was a very experienced soldier and had commander-in-Chief for three years. He had fought in the Sudan and the then the Boer war in 1899-1902.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work