• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you perceive to be the more accurate?

Extracts from this document...


Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you perceive to be the more accurate? Herodotus was first thought of as the 'Father of History' by the Roman statesman Cicero, due to the fact that his book, called The Histories on the subject of the Persian Wars, is often considered the first of its style. However he is also referred as the 'Father of Lies', for many of the statements in his work are unfounded, unproved and have been shown to be false. It is thought that Herodotus began work on his histories in 443BC, he had however been travelling around Asia Minor and the Mediterranean, gathering information that would later prove useful when writing the history of his travels and the war. The earlier sections of his work concentrate on the customs, traditions, history and legends of the peoples of the ancient world, such as the Lydians, Persians and Egyptians. It is likely that Herodotus actually did travel to many of the places where he describes, and his audience would have found the anecdotes and digressions of his work scintillating, delightful and insightful since they would have little or even no knowledge of these lands. To his critics Herodotus was an unnecessary romantic whose work lacked serious analysis and commentary, and concentrated too much on the trivial and superficial stories in order that his work would be available to those other than an academic elite. ...read more.


Dionysius of Halicarnassus was writing around 400 years after Herodotus. He was interested in the beginnings of history and what determines a good historian. He stated that, although there had been a few local historians emerging around and before the time of Herodotus, they were insular in comparison, and 'he chose not to write down the history of a single city or nation, but to put together many, varied events of Europe and Asia in a single comprehensive work.' In a letter to his friend Gnaeus Pompeius Geminus, he makes a comparison between Herodotus and Thucydides, showing, according to 'the six rules of good history', how Herodotus was in fact the better historian. Herodotus' subject matter was that of a glorious war where Greece was the clear victor. Dionysius also makes the case that Herodotus has known exactly what to include in his book, and what order to put it in, so that it is, informative and yet enjoyable at the same time. Herodotus' tone is always appropriate being neither harsh nor outspoken. Finally he points out that Herodotus' style is fine and measured throughout. With exception to the final point, Dionysius does not feel that Thucydides has in any way fulfilled these points. The argument that Dionysius makes for Herodotus certainly seems convincing. However, it is important to remember that Dionysius is not entirely objective, as he comes from the home town of Herodotus and would therefore have felt an affinity with the Historian. ...read more.


For example, In book 6, chapter 30, Darius is made out as a good delagator, and forgiving, and in book 5, chapter 124 he is said to be militarily formidable, "Darius succeeded all other generals". However in most other parts of the book he said to have been vengeful and tyrannical. Other Homeric elements include his extensive categorisation and also genealogy, which also emphasises the oral tradition. In conclusion, it is difficult to perceive whether Herodotus was indeed the father of lies or the father of history. Clearly there are many example of where Herodotus lied or stretched the truth: he could not have witnessed all speeches and therefore there may have been inaccuracies in his work. Critics like Plutarch had the belief that Herodotus was overly romantic in his writings and this hampered his ability to always tell a fully analytical history in a chronological and linear fashion. We could view his omissions and inaccuracies as artist superfluities that enriched his work and made it an enjoyable, interesting and informative read. Clearly Herodotus' work was indeed groundbreaking and the first of its kind, his account of the Persian wars is the most complete and is regarded by academics throughout time as not only a great piece of literature, like Dionysius, but also as a reliable historian. Therefore it is my opinion that Herodotus is certainly the definitive father of History, which has elements of untruthfulness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    The human mind is certainly creative, however it is also capable of predijuce and memory loss, which has the ablility to underline everything that is said, especially under a recorded conversation. If one want's to speak their truth then there is no greater time to have their opinion heard.

  2. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    This proved to have a negative impact on peoples lives in Scotland because it gave an impression that Scotland was an unfriendly nation, which put off a lot of people from immigrating to Scotland. As you can see, you don't need to make it over complicated.

  1. A Critical Analysis of: Lies My Teacher Told Me

    He starts off rather arrogantly, claiming that his book will correct what history text books got wrong; that his book will put a new light upon what everybody thinks about America and what it was really all about. Then, through the content of the rest of his book, he proves

  2. Hitlers promise of a better future for German people was the most important reason ...

    Nevertheless, there was nothing unlawful in the course of events until 30th January. Due, to a large extent, to the mistakes of his opponents Hitler and the Nazis had gained power in a completely constitutional manner. As W. Shirer put it "The cardinal error of the Germans who opposed Hitler was their failure to unite against him."

  1. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    Tacitus' use of speeches is different, but it is clear that he has also rewritten speeches or included what he thought was appropriate. This is most obviously the case in the speech of Claudius regarding the inclusion of foreigners in the senate.

  2. Cats in Ancient Egypt

    Hathor's reputation as the goddess of love added to the cat's image of feminism. In the late dynastic period, cats were considered so sacred, that killing them even unintentionally, was a crime punishable by death. Though, killing cats was considered a sacrilege, sacrificing them was not.

  1. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    The Romans authors also made a point of enhancing the apparent barbarism of the natives. Strabo wrote that they "are well supplied with milk but do not know how to make cheese; they know nothing of planting crops or of farming in general."

  2. Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides.

    Unlike Thucydides, Herodotus focused primarily on the non-Greek world. After leaving his home town of Halicarnassus, he embarked upon a journey of the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor, the Aegean, Ionian and Mediterranean islands of Rhodes, Cyprus, Delos, Paros, Thasos, Samothrace, Crete, Samos, Cythera and Aegina. He travelled south to the Persian capital of Susa, Babylon and Colchis, and north to Scythia and Thrace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work