• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you perceive to be the more accurate?

Extracts from this document...


Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you perceive to be the more accurate? Herodotus was first thought of as the 'Father of History' by the Roman statesman Cicero, due to the fact that his book, called The Histories on the subject of the Persian Wars, is often considered the first of its style. However he is also referred as the 'Father of Lies', for many of the statements in his work are unfounded, unproved and have been shown to be false. It is thought that Herodotus began work on his histories in 443BC, he had however been travelling around Asia Minor and the Mediterranean, gathering information that would later prove useful when writing the history of his travels and the war. The earlier sections of his work concentrate on the customs, traditions, history and legends of the peoples of the ancient world, such as the Lydians, Persians and Egyptians. It is likely that Herodotus actually did travel to many of the places where he describes, and his audience would have found the anecdotes and digressions of his work scintillating, delightful and insightful since they would have little or even no knowledge of these lands. To his critics Herodotus was an unnecessary romantic whose work lacked serious analysis and commentary, and concentrated too much on the trivial and superficial stories in order that his work would be available to those other than an academic elite. ...read more.


Dionysius of Halicarnassus was writing around 400 years after Herodotus. He was interested in the beginnings of history and what determines a good historian. He stated that, although there had been a few local historians emerging around and before the time of Herodotus, they were insular in comparison, and 'he chose not to write down the history of a single city or nation, but to put together many, varied events of Europe and Asia in a single comprehensive work.' In a letter to his friend Gnaeus Pompeius Geminus, he makes a comparison between Herodotus and Thucydides, showing, according to 'the six rules of good history', how Herodotus was in fact the better historian. Herodotus' subject matter was that of a glorious war where Greece was the clear victor. Dionysius also makes the case that Herodotus has known exactly what to include in his book, and what order to put it in, so that it is, informative and yet enjoyable at the same time. Herodotus' tone is always appropriate being neither harsh nor outspoken. Finally he points out that Herodotus' style is fine and measured throughout. With exception to the final point, Dionysius does not feel that Thucydides has in any way fulfilled these points. The argument that Dionysius makes for Herodotus certainly seems convincing. However, it is important to remember that Dionysius is not entirely objective, as he comes from the home town of Herodotus and would therefore have felt an affinity with the Historian. ...read more.


For example, In book 6, chapter 30, Darius is made out as a good delagator, and forgiving, and in book 5, chapter 124 he is said to be militarily formidable, "Darius succeeded all other generals". However in most other parts of the book he said to have been vengeful and tyrannical. Other Homeric elements include his extensive categorisation and also genealogy, which also emphasises the oral tradition. In conclusion, it is difficult to perceive whether Herodotus was indeed the father of lies or the father of history. Clearly there are many example of where Herodotus lied or stretched the truth: he could not have witnessed all speeches and therefore there may have been inaccuracies in his work. Critics like Plutarch had the belief that Herodotus was overly romantic in his writings and this hampered his ability to always tell a fully analytical history in a chronological and linear fashion. We could view his omissions and inaccuracies as artist superfluities that enriched his work and made it an enjoyable, interesting and informative read. Clearly Herodotus' work was indeed groundbreaking and the first of its kind, his account of the Persian wars is the most complete and is regarded by academics throughout time as not only a great piece of literature, like Dionysius, but also as a reliable historian. Therefore it is my opinion that Herodotus is certainly the definitive father of History, which has elements of untruthfulness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. swansea and the Blits version 2

    their progress would have put them right where a German bomb had dropped. The bomb demolished 4 houses, left an enormous crater in the road and killed a number of people residents. It also struck a gas main and the resulting fire sent flames shooting high into the air illuminating the whole area.

  2. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    Tacitus illustrates this through the effective use of techniques such as direct and indirect speech. Direct speech often indicates a professed motive - as this is the motive that the majority recognise.

  1. Objective histories.

    The past is not handed to us directly, but we perceive it through the eyes of the historians, who shape it to reflect their own political, social, cultural, religious and educational stances. Conversely, we have the primary sources/evidence available to us, which provide us with information about the past with an absolute minimum of interference of historians.

  2. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    As Carlo reflects in chapter 6, "history is the propaganda of the victors". The picaresque structure of the opening third of the novel contributes to the hybridised nature of the story with the delicate intertwining of fiction and war history, the story "melting into history" as Pelagia experiences when watching a naked Mandras fishing.

  1. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    The result of an interview is what the subject holds as truth, so therefore any account of oral history is relivant, however opinionitive. A major dilema found in oral history, which was broght to my attention when reading O'Farrell's (1979)

  2. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    This is where you have to recall your own knowledge, put it into essay form and more importantly, answer the question. I've found that the following little formula helps: For each point (paragraph) in your essay, I suggest you write in the following format: * (Joining word)

  1. Analyse various representations of Arthur, from the earliest times to recent scholarship.

    rather than historical writing style adopted, combined with the lack of historical evidence22. Accordingly, many historians have deemed Geoffrey's writings as psuedo history23, Just one such historian is Thomas Green who commented that 'it would be unwise to take this [Geoffrey's writings] for fact...'24.

  2. The Black Country Living Museum gives an accurate representation of what life would be ...

    Before the Black Country Museum knocked down to be rebuilt all the bricks where number so that they could build it back in the same order and in the same way as it was built before.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work