• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you perceive to be the more accurate?

Extracts from this document...


Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you perceive to be the more accurate? Herodotus was first thought of as the 'Father of History' by the Roman statesman Cicero, due to the fact that his book, called The Histories on the subject of the Persian Wars, is often considered the first of its style. However he is also referred as the 'Father of Lies', for many of the statements in his work are unfounded, unproved and have been shown to be false. It is thought that Herodotus began work on his histories in 443BC, he had however been travelling around Asia Minor and the Mediterranean, gathering information that would later prove useful when writing the history of his travels and the war. The earlier sections of his work concentrate on the customs, traditions, history and legends of the peoples of the ancient world, such as the Lydians, Persians and Egyptians. It is likely that Herodotus actually did travel to many of the places where he describes, and his audience would have found the anecdotes and digressions of his work scintillating, delightful and insightful since they would have little or even no knowledge of these lands. To his critics Herodotus was an unnecessary romantic whose work lacked serious analysis and commentary, and concentrated too much on the trivial and superficial stories in order that his work would be available to those other than an academic elite. ...read more.


Dionysius of Halicarnassus was writing around 400 years after Herodotus. He was interested in the beginnings of history and what determines a good historian. He stated that, although there had been a few local historians emerging around and before the time of Herodotus, they were insular in comparison, and 'he chose not to write down the history of a single city or nation, but to put together many, varied events of Europe and Asia in a single comprehensive work.' In a letter to his friend Gnaeus Pompeius Geminus, he makes a comparison between Herodotus and Thucydides, showing, according to 'the six rules of good history', how Herodotus was in fact the better historian. Herodotus' subject matter was that of a glorious war where Greece was the clear victor. Dionysius also makes the case that Herodotus has known exactly what to include in his book, and what order to put it in, so that it is, informative and yet enjoyable at the same time. Herodotus' tone is always appropriate being neither harsh nor outspoken. Finally he points out that Herodotus' style is fine and measured throughout. With exception to the final point, Dionysius does not feel that Thucydides has in any way fulfilled these points. The argument that Dionysius makes for Herodotus certainly seems convincing. However, it is important to remember that Dionysius is not entirely objective, as he comes from the home town of Herodotus and would therefore have felt an affinity with the Historian. ...read more.


For example, In book 6, chapter 30, Darius is made out as a good delagator, and forgiving, and in book 5, chapter 124 he is said to be militarily formidable, "Darius succeeded all other generals". However in most other parts of the book he said to have been vengeful and tyrannical. Other Homeric elements include his extensive categorisation and also genealogy, which also emphasises the oral tradition. In conclusion, it is difficult to perceive whether Herodotus was indeed the father of lies or the father of history. Clearly there are many example of where Herodotus lied or stretched the truth: he could not have witnessed all speeches and therefore there may have been inaccuracies in his work. Critics like Plutarch had the belief that Herodotus was overly romantic in his writings and this hampered his ability to always tell a fully analytical history in a chronological and linear fashion. We could view his omissions and inaccuracies as artist superfluities that enriched his work and made it an enjoyable, interesting and informative read. Clearly Herodotus' work was indeed groundbreaking and the first of its kind, his account of the Persian wars is the most complete and is regarded by academics throughout time as not only a great piece of literature, like Dionysius, but also as a reliable historian. Therefore it is my opinion that Herodotus is certainly the definitive father of History, which has elements of untruthfulness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    This proved to have a negative impact on peoples lives in Scotland because it gave an impression that Scotland was an unfriendly nation, which put off a lot of people from immigrating to Scotland. As you can see, you don't need to make it over complicated.

  2. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    only that "they are ruled by their own kings" which is vague and only makes sense after having read accounts from other authors. Caesar only referred to the tribes and their leaders as if his readers would have already know about the tribal system in Britain, only elaborating on the

  1. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    The human mind is certainly creative, however it is also capable of predijuce and memory loss, which has the ablility to underline everything that is said, especially under a recorded conversation. If one want's to speak their truth then there is no greater time to have their opinion heard.

  2. swansea and the Blits version 2

    This meant there was more then half of Swansea who had a lack of Anderson shelters to protect them selves. This meant they hadn't finished building Anderson shelters and other protective holding places by the time the war came. At the time of the 3 night Blitz, basements were the main type of shelters in central Swansea.

  1. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    Individual action is of much greater importance to Tacitus than to Thucydides; there are very few individuals in Thucydides accounts. Tacitus is greatly interested in the psychology behind actions and the distinction between real and professed motives; we can see why morality is an important aspect of his works.

  2. Objective histories.

    The past is not handed to us directly, but we perceive it through the eyes of the historians, who shape it to reflect their own political, social, cultural, religious and educational stances. Conversely, we have the primary sources/evidence available to us, which provide us with information about the past with an absolute minimum of interference of historians.

  1. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    This is a common feature in contemporary post-modernist novels where the omniscient Victorian narrator is not present, and also helps to recognise the relative and subjective nature of truth and reality. Because the reader is left to follow the own personal path through the novel, the idea is introduced that there are no absolute truths.

  2. Analyse various representations of Arthur, from the earliest times to recent scholarship.

    Compared to Nennius, Geoffrey also goes into a more detailed description of Arthur's life, describing (amongst other things) Arthur's; overseas battles20; death in 543AD21; and family life. This text has recently experienced a great deal of academic criticism concerning its validity; this criticism has largely been reactive to the fictional

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work