• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hiroshima Bombing, Justified or not?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hiroshima Bombing, Justified or not? Since the dropping of the Atomic bomb 'Enola Gay' on Hiroshima in 1945, many Historians and Philosophers have debated and questioned the moral laws of this solo event, the single happening that probably changed war and chemical use forever, the sole occurrence that claimed the life of thousands of innocent women and children. In this essay the moral and ethnic 'so called' laws are going to be discussed and the actions of the occurrence whether said to be right or wrong are going to be weighed up and determined if they firstly, are valuable and then I am going to place all of these useful points together to see if the bombings were justified or completely un-justified. Let's first begin with Source A: "Conventional bombing (if affective) would kill far more Japanese then an Atomic bomb would" This quote states that "conventional" (Normal) ...read more.

Middle

Mainly America believed this and also that thousands of troops would be killed on both sides in the allies attempt to take or over run Japan. The nuclear bomb was quick, fast and easy and therefore would save many young men's lives and release a grip on the prisoners of war. Source B is especially useful as is gives us a deep look into how powerful the bombs really were. The only problem is that they were tested in a dessert without proper conditions and therefore an improper test, this made the nuclear bomb seem less powerful and therefore ineffective. This also relates to Harry.S. Truman. Statistical evidence of the consequences of American bombing raids on Japanese mainland in 1945. The opposite is of course that of Source D Comment made by Admiral William D.Leahy, Chief staff to the president, 1945: Now this comment is a huge blunder in the argument for Hiroshima as the president's right hand man was very powerful and important, like ...read more.

Conclusion

are standing in front of a background, the background looks dark and chaotic and like something has completely blown everything to pieces. The writing says "Japan was seeking peace already before the bomb was dropped" This tells us that Britain was against the dropping and did not want it. The Conclusion After piecing all the evidence together I am willing to believe that Japan was ready to surrender as P.Os were not always kept in touch with what was happening and therefore did not know the whole truth or at least all the options and also that the comment made by the Admiral is too good to miss and means so very much plus I bet many countries also thought that the bomb was not worth it. But I suppose we will never really understand. I think I have a clear thought in my head, but what about you? With all the evidence for and against what path will you take? - Justified or not? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Was Truman right to drop the atomic bomb on Japan?

    Only six months later, in June 1942, the US fleet defeated Japan in the Battle of Midway. In my opinion the gamble failed because he took a great risk in trying to guess that all the ships and airplanes for war supply were there but America is very big and

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    The newspaper is not fully in agreement with Truman, as it does not give enough information. This article is sympathetic to America and generally agrees with Truman's view, however is not fully in agreement, as it was written the same day that the bomb was dropped, and this means that they would not have been fully aware of the after-effects.

  1. Were the Americans justified in dropping the Atomic Bombs on Japan in 1945?

    This could be bias because it is written by a Soviet and he might be more negative against America as they are enemies with his country. Also, he might not want to believe that America had a just cause for launching 2 nuclear bombs on Japan.

  2. There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role. ...

    were connected to the government so this could have been biased or censored so it is not very useful. The attitude towards women is that they were gossips, a nuisance, to look after the children and for the men's private usage that is in general.

  1. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    What make it worse was, far worse than just not having any space to move is that women and men who did not know each other were put right next to each other so closely that not even Father and Mother would have done in public.

  2. The Atomic Bombings of Japan

    The Americans and Russians despised each other but never went to war. Both countries' attitudes to the Cold War were polarised. The President of the USA called the Russians "The enemy of freedom". These sources can be biased but are useful as primary sources; they give you insights into how

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work