• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hiroshima Bombing, Justified or not?

Extracts from this document...


Hiroshima Bombing, Justified or not? Since the dropping of the Atomic bomb 'Enola Gay' on Hiroshima in 1945, many Historians and Philosophers have debated and questioned the moral laws of this solo event, the single happening that probably changed war and chemical use forever, the sole occurrence that claimed the life of thousands of innocent women and children. In this essay the moral and ethnic 'so called' laws are going to be discussed and the actions of the occurrence whether said to be right or wrong are going to be weighed up and determined if they firstly, are valuable and then I am going to place all of these useful points together to see if the bombings were justified or completely un-justified. Let's first begin with Source A: "Conventional bombing (if affective) would kill far more Japanese then an Atomic bomb would" This quote states that "conventional" (Normal) ...read more.


Mainly America believed this and also that thousands of troops would be killed on both sides in the allies attempt to take or over run Japan. The nuclear bomb was quick, fast and easy and therefore would save many young men's lives and release a grip on the prisoners of war. Source B is especially useful as is gives us a deep look into how powerful the bombs really were. The only problem is that they were tested in a dessert without proper conditions and therefore an improper test, this made the nuclear bomb seem less powerful and therefore ineffective. This also relates to Harry.S. Truman. Statistical evidence of the consequences of American bombing raids on Japanese mainland in 1945. The opposite is of course that of Source D Comment made by Admiral William D.Leahy, Chief staff to the president, 1945: Now this comment is a huge blunder in the argument for Hiroshima as the president's right hand man was very powerful and important, like ...read more.


are standing in front of a background, the background looks dark and chaotic and like something has completely blown everything to pieces. The writing says "Japan was seeking peace already before the bomb was dropped" This tells us that Britain was against the dropping and did not want it. The Conclusion After piecing all the evidence together I am willing to believe that Japan was ready to surrender as P.Os were not always kept in touch with what was happening and therefore did not know the whole truth or at least all the options and also that the comment made by the Admiral is too good to miss and means so very much plus I bet many countries also thought that the bomb was not worth it. But I suppose we will never really understand. I think I have a clear thought in my head, but what about you? With all the evidence for and against what path will you take? - Justified or not? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Atomic Bombings of Japan q.5

    The newspaper is not fully in agreement with Truman, as it does not give enough information. This article is sympathetic to America and generally agrees with Truman's view, however is not fully in agreement, as it was written the same day that the bomb was dropped, and this means that they would not have been fully aware of the after-effects.

  2. Was Truman right to drop the atomic bomb on Japan?

    Only six months later, in June 1942, the US fleet defeated Japan in the Battle of Midway. In my opinion the gamble failed because he took a great risk in trying to guess that all the ships and airplanes for war supply were there but America is very big and

  1. There is plenty to suggest that women never got away from their traditional role. ...

    A way that DeMarco is disputed is that women had a non-traditional role of sharing jobs with other women by which they still stayed at home but they also went out to work in the factories meaning that they had to take up two different jobs this is proven in

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    It is unacceptable! Though I was very little, Mother had always taught us to respect one and other and ourselves, Women and men who are not married could never be so close together, it was wrong! I looked at mother bewildered and affrightedly, she was lying next to an unknown man!

  1. The Atomic Bombings of Japan

    The Americans and Russians despised each other but never went to war. Both countries' attitudes to the Cold War were polarised. The President of the USA called the Russians "The enemy of freedom". These sources can be biased but are useful as primary sources; they give you insights into how

  2. The Bombing of Hiroshima - source related study.

    The source may be taken for propaganda. It shows annihilation and this represents power. This may have been used to show the American people that the country was still powerful and get their moral up after losing hundreds of thousands of American lives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work