• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Depth Study Coursework-USA 1919-1945 (a) The amount of evidence of Prohibition can be greatened over time and as these two sources were written well after the end of Prohibition, there may be some parts that agree, but they could also be interpretations. Sources A and B agree on many of there points, but the first line of Source A shows that it may disagree as it differs with Source B about the causes of Prohibition, but it does agree in the sense it says that pressure from the lobby groups such as Anti-Saloon League had an influence. This is pointed out in Source A where they say "influence of the Anti-Saloon League" and source B "A nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League". The two sources agree about Prohibition being a "moral fervour" As it is put in source A and "evils of the times" as it is put in source B. These show the thoughts from the women and the groups. Although source B does say that it is a moral crusade, it does not mention about the German connection with brewing that is made in source A, but taking this into consideration, we do see that both agree that women played a big part in bringing in Prohibition. In source A this is shown by the "large numbers of men were absent in the Armed forces" and in source B, where it mention "Women's Christian Temperance Union" and the "Anti-Saloon League", which were made up by a lot of women. Source A talks about "the wartime concern for preserving grain for food" which is echoed in source B where it said that the Anti-Saloon league "Brought pressure to bear on Congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing". The two source also agree with the fact that crime went up because of public demand for liquor, which is the "greatest criminal boom in American history" in source A and in source B shows it to have ...read more.

Middle

The problem also with these statistics is that we do not have a percentage the gallons and stills seized so for all the reader knows, the agents could have seized the same percentage and so they would not have accomplished much in their job. These make the statistics unreliable, though they do show a trend that the stills and gallons seized did increase. Source H shows the amount of drunks, drunk and disorderly conduct and drunk drivers. These are again in the format of statistics, which are not given in the percentage of that year, but rather the amount, so they can be taken as unreliable. Although this is true, we also need to see that there was an increase in the amount of drunks, even if it is the same percentage and they have increased by an incredible amount. Even the first year has a great amount of people who are drunk which shows that many people did not actually care about Prohibition. This is also only the amount in the city of Philadelphia, so this is not coverage of the whole country. Also it is an industrial city so it would differ from the more agricultural side of the country which were the people to put forward the idea and were more likely to enforce it in a greater way. The statistics do show a steady increase in the amount of drunks, but drunk and disorderly conduct seems to have decreased below its starting point in 1925 which shows that possibly less people were behaving disorderly as the amount of drunks still increased. It is unsure of the disorderly conduct increased, or if the drunks increased, so this could be seen as unreliable. The amount of drunk drivers also increased, from 0 in 1920 to 820 in 1925. The reader nay be unsure about this as many people did not own a car at the period and it was in the 20's that there was an increase in the consumer buying of cars, so the amount of drunk drivers would have increased according to the amount of drivers there were around. ...read more.

Conclusion

It does not say that it was going to happen and so it is difficult to categorise these sources. In conclusion, the failure of Prohibition was inevitable but the sources did not say blatantly that it was gong to happen. It told us the consequence of enforcing the law and the inference showed that the failure of Prohibition was a failure. Source a and B were modern sources, picking upon information from other textbooks so it gives a more wider view of it and it shows that it was inevitable because of all the discomfort it was causing. Sources C and D were from before Prohibition, but Source e was written by an industrialist which showed the changing of opinions and what he felt were reasons for why Prohibition had failed its aim. Source F was written right at the start of Prohibition and so was not that much use. Sources G and H also showed reasons that contributed to Prohibition failing its aim as well. Sources I and J both show the corruption that would also add to the failure of Prohibition. Five of the sources support the view that the failure was inevitable and two show the corruption, but the majority do follow that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable. The sources that show the other side of the augment are few and were written at the beginning of Prohibition and so are not true views of the people. Also many of these sources are taken from city areas rather than rural, so the feelings there, where Prohibition started are not shown. The 18th Amendment was written to stop people from drinking alcohol. Women thought it was right as there husbands did not spend their money and industrialists thought it to be good as their workers would work more efficiently. They believed in it but many people ignored it and managed to corrupt the system, destroying the law and causing the greatest boom in crime. These helped to end Prohibition. Ambareen Naqvi 11K 1 Assignment 1 Candidate Number: 3108 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    The poster in source C was published in 1910, five years before the poster in source D and 10 years before Prohibition came into effect across the United States in 1920. Both posters were used to gain support for prohibition and were directed at people from all walks of life.

  2. The USA

    He started off the letter saying he hoped that the prohibition would be 'widely supported by public opinion' this suggests that he wanted alcohol to be banned to prove this point, he said the alcohols had many 'evil effects' to people.

  1. History Coursework: Why Did Prohibition End?

    The agents had 29,000 kilometres of coastline to patrol and a population of 125 million to regulate. The Prohibition Agents were appointed because they though to have 'the expert technical knowledge and the diligence to supervise.. To outwit the craftiest devices of smugglers..Resist corruption' Of course, they didn't as one

  2. Why did prohibition fail?

    Opposite the city of Detroit there are the seven border cities of Canada with a total population of 110,000, in these towns were breweries, distilleries and shops selling alcohol - all across the water fronts were docks from which alcohol could legally be cleared through Canadian customs and put on

  1. GCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Was the New Deal a Success?

    person is not the only one but millions of people are thankful of Roosevelt for the New Deal. However source I is a less useful source in my view as it is simply an excerpt from a popular song which doesn't provide us with any serious factual information but only

  2. History - Prohibition

    Source B, on the other hand, only focuses on the Women's Temperance Movement and does not mention any other factors for the introduction of Prohibition: 'A nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on Congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing'.

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    In my opinion I feel that I can only trust sources 11, 12, 13 to a certain extent. Al Capone was indeed a very popular figure, almost in a celebrity status. All three sources project Al Capone as admirable, noble and respectable.

  2. Prohibition - source related study.

    But if they did were prepared to pay that much before prohibition when it wasn't banned, they might pay more when it was being enforced. The amount of demand might increase too, more people would want alcohol, - if you make something illegal then it sounds all the more attractive and so more people would want to do it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work