• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Essay - Why did war break out in Europe in 1939

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did war break out in Europe in 1939? Many historians have traced the causes of World War II to problems left unsolved by World War I (1914-1918). World War I and the treaties that ended it also created new political and economic problems. Forceful leaders in several countries took advantage of these problems to seize power one of the being Hitler. The desire of dictators in Germany, Italy, and Japan to conquer additional territory brought them into conflict with the democratic nations e.g. Britain and France against Germany. After World War I ended, representatives of each of the countries met in Paris in 1919 to draw up peace treaties. These treaties were known as the Peace of Paris. They were worked out in haste by these countries with opposing goals; and failed to satisfy even the victors. Of all the countries Germany left the peace conference the most dissatisfied. Italy gained less territory than it felt it deserved and vowed to take action on its own. The countries that lost World War I -Germany, Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey - were especially dissatisfied with the treaties. They were stripped of territory, arms and were required to make reparations. The Treaty of Versailles, which was signed with Germany, punished Germany severely. The German government agreed to sign the treaty only after they were threatened to be invaded by the allies. ...read more.

Middle

Like Japan Italy was a key member of the League and wanted to expand territory by invading another country. However unlike Manchuria the League could not argue that Abyssinia was in an inaccessible part of the world. Britain and France wanted to keep Italy happy as without it they would be powerless against Hitler. However although they imposed sanction against Italy they made a fatal error of not closing the Suez Canal. Had they of done this they could have ended the campaign very quickly. Italy continued to ignore orders from the League and by May 1936 Italy had gained the capital of Abyssinia, Addis Ababa. The League had failed. Britain and France thought if they handled the crisis well they would be in a stronger position against Germany. However they could not have been more wrong and in November 1936 Hitler and Mussolini signed an agreement of their own called the Rome-Berlin Axis. These two failures clearly demonstrated to Hitler that the League was powerless. He would be able conquer other countries and no one would be willing to intervene. After Hitler took power, he began to build up Germany's armed forces in violation of the Treaty of Versailles. In 1936, Hitler sent troops into the Rhineland, a region of Germany along the banks of the Rhine River. Under the treaty, the Rhineland was to remain free of troops. In March 1938, German soldiers marched into Austria and united it with Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin knew that Hitler would turn all his military might toward him, signing the pact brought him extra time and allowed him to build up him military forces. He also believed that Britain and France would not be strong reliable allies against Hitler. Not only did the pact give Stalin time, he also acquired new land which Hitler had conquered. On September 1st 1939 the Germany army invaded Poland from the west and on the 17th Soviet forces attacked from the east. Poland was conquered. Hitler was given and ultimatum, he was ordered to get out of Poland. However he did not agree, hence Britain and France declared war on Germany on the 2nd September 1939. Hitler had started a war, but it was not the war he had in mind. It was too soon and against the wrong opponents. Hitler had taken one gamble too many. Although Hitler caused WW2 by refusing to leave Poland there and other factors which contributed. I strongly believe had the USA joined the LON it would not have been so powerless and insignificant. They may well have been able to stop Hitler way before. In addition the LON was unfair towards the Germans it served as a constant reminder of their humiliating defeat and was sooner or later someone was going to do something about it. Thirdly had Hitler not made the pact with Stalin Germany would may well have had to fight a war on two front again and could well have been pulverised. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why Did The First World War Break Out in 1914?

    5 star(s)

    The sixth automobile was empty incase one of the others fail. Many of the houses and buildings lining the route were decorated with flags and flowers. Crowds lined the Appel Quay to cheer the imperial couple. The Black Hand, a Serbian terrorist organization, had trained a small group of teenage

  2. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    In 1825, the problem was discussed again. - In 1825, Turkey asked Egypt to help and Russia also started to help Greece. - Up to this point, other great powers worried about the expansion of Russia in the Balkans. Britain called the Conference of London in 1827.

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  2. Questions on World War One.

    There was, of course, increasing urgency in Vienna that the Slav problem (the threat posed to Habsburg interests by Slav nationalism) be 'solved'. There was also strong evidence that Russia would not accept another humiliation in the Balkans, such as that over Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1908 and that she would not allow the Serbs to be crushed by Austria-Hungary.

  1. How significant was the Night of the Long Knives in enabling Hitler to consolidate ...

    It would constantly bombard people with whatever the Nazis wanted them to hear using media such as the radio and newspapers. They would broadcast achievements of the regime/Hitler. In May 1933, trade unions were broken up and cemented into one organisation: the Deutsche Arbeitsfront (German Labour Front).

  2. How fair is Louise Shaw's Interpretation on Chamberlain? The interpretation revolves around the idea ...

    available to the public thought of the former prime minister in the same way. Nevertheless, Interpretation A is not entirely fair, it fails to show and describe the difficulty of European politics at the time. Interpretation A describes a ?workable solution for discouraging, or if necessary defeating, Hitler.? However, once

  1. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    In 1936, when Italy started the conflict in Abyssinia, Hitler knew the two things: firstly, that the League of Nations would not act militarily against Germany, and secondly that the League of Nations was distracted with that crisis and it gave him the perfect opportunity to occupy the Rhineland.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    Lord Lytton sailed to China to carry out an investigation and meanwhile the league asked the Japanese to withdraw their troops from Manchuria, however they ignored this. Additionally, the Lytton Commission report took 1 year to finish (finally reported in September 1932), and the report said that Japan acted unlawfully and should be return Manchuria to China.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work