• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

History Extension Major Work- The 1932-33 Bodyline Series

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Extension History Major Work The 1932-33 Bodyline Series Synopsis Many debates have been focused around the 1932/33 Bodyline series. Some of these debates have included the effects of politics and the Great Depression throughout the series or the effect the Bodyline series had on the way the game was changed in future Ashes series encounters. However, none of these arguments have been more heavily debated than that of the ethics of the 'bodyline bowling' tactic. Whilst considered to be legal and well within the Laws of Cricket many were unsure as to whether or not it was considered to be 'in the spirit of the game'. Within this argument debate has also arisen of whether or not the English cricket team could still have beaten the Australian side even without the use of the 'bodyline bowling' tactic. Instead of the use of historians both from the 1930s and today to create a debate, major players involved in the series, such as the English captain Douglas Jardine, the Australian captain Bill Woodfull as well as the English fast bowler Harold Larwood. Other players who contributed included the likes of Bill O'Reilly and Vic Richardson. Also involved were journalists such as Jack Fingleton, who even took part in the series as a member of the Australian cricket team and one of the Test series umpires George Hele. A large number of statistics have also been employed to assist in answering the essay question. Books involving many established modern day cricket writers including Jack Pollard, Jack McHarg and David Frith were essential to the construction of this project. What was Douglas Jardine's aim in introducing the 'bodyline bowling' tactic, did he achieve his goals? Would England still have won without the use of the 'bodyline bowling' tactic? The Ashes series of 1932/33, more commonly known as the Bodyline series caused great controversy among two nations when Douglas Jardine, the English captain brought in a tactic that was considered to be 'not in the spirit of the game'. ...read more.

Middle

When looking at the Australian line-up one can see that the majority of bowlers selected with the exception of Tim Wall, were spin bowlers such as Bill O'Reilly and Clarence Grimmett. On Australian wickets in a dry summer the prevailing lbw rule made it difficult for O'Reilly, Grimmett or Ironmonger to alter the course of the test series. It is clear that the Australian side had a definite lack in pace, whereas in the English line-up accurate medium-pacers such as Maurice Tate and the leg spinner, Thomas Mitchell were cast aside for the faster bowlers such as Bill Bowes, Harold Larwood, "Gubby" Allen and Bill Voce. Both sides had competent batsmen; however it was this clear lack in bowling strength on the Australians part that lead some to believe that the Australians weren't as good as first thought. Thus, raising the question, was 'bodyline' necessary? Harold Larwood believes it was. In an interview with Harold Larwood, interviewer Norman May asks the question - Who was bodyline intended for? To this Larwood replied - "It was put on for Bradman and Bradman only!!!"19 Larwood believes the only way to combat Don Bradman was through the 'bodyline bowling' tactic. The statistics disagree. Evidence that shows the use of 'bodyline bowling' was pointless. 'In Brisbane...Larwood clean bowled Bradman'20 and his figures from the test series show that of his 33 wickets taken, 12 were clean bowled and a further 4 were leg before wicket. This shows that 'bodyline bowling' did not succeed quite to the extent as Jardine had hoped. Also, "Gubby" Allen 'played in all five Test matches and captured 21 wickets at 28 with orthodox methods'21. These figures further emphasise the fact that even without 'bodyline bowling' Jardine and his men still would most likely have won the series anyway. Another view on the Bodyline series was that it was the field placings that made all the difference rather than the bodyline attack itself. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the reliability of this source can be questioned. The interview was broadcast on November 4 1982 and the Bodyline series occurred in 1932, therefore over time these player's perspectives of the events could have changed as they heard different sides of the story from other players and spectators or they may have forgotten simple details that could have possibly been vital in expressing their own opinions towards the series and their opposing team. I used the website CricInfo Australia, formerly know as www.baggygreen.com.au. This website allowed me to access all player biographies from the Bodyline series as well as the batting statistics I needed for my debate. These statistics were useful as they were accurate and did not rely on someone's opinion and I could get a definite answer from them. The statistics I got from this site also allowed me to compare other statistics such as the English batting statistics which also helped in my essay. One visible strength of this website was that it was included all statistics available from the matches and even included the oppositions figures. A weakness however was that these records were not able to tell me the match conditions that may have affected the players in the match. These match conditions include the hardness of the pitch, the temperature at ground level and the number of crowd attendance. Each of these factors could have impacted on the players and affected their concentration levels during the game thus altering the game itself. I also used a book by David Frith called 'Bodyline Autopsy: the full story of the most sensational Test Cricket series: Australia vs. England 1932-33'. Just as the name suggests this book gives the "full story". The author remains as unbiased as possible. Frith includes comments from leading personalities of both the English and Australian cricket teams as well as including various umpire reports, comments made by journalists and even spectator accounts. By providing me with all these different perspectives I was able to form a much wider view on the Bodyline series rather than just having a strictly Australian or English perspective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    do them no favour, in fact it would sway him further towards the repeal on stubborn principles. There was an expressed National interest at the time, the entire Nation was behind Peel pressing for reform. This was the age of radical politics, and the Corn Laws acted as a magnet to radical groupings.

  2. 'Law and Order in the American West'

    would have prostitutes available for their pleasure as opposed to raping innocent women (wives, mothers, daughters of men). Crimes of this nature would only ignite more violent conflicts, as people would seek to exact revenge. In this respect prostitutes made a positive contribution to reducing the problem of lawlessness and violence.

  1. Knightly Warfare. The knights primary and considered most well known weapon was the ...

    Armor 3). This allowed a greater degree of weight distribution along the arm, rather than the weight pulling on the wrist like former shields (Med. Armor 3). Another well known and widely used shield during the Middle Ages was called the buckler.

  2. How was the schlieffen plan meant to work

    Germany, as they would have too much opposition making it almost impossible to meet the 6-week deadline that was given. Another factor that the Germans relied on was that they expected the period for Russia to mobilize their army to be quite long.

  1. Walcott depicts himself as "the mulatto of style" in "What the Twilight Says: An ...

    mulatto he has also been nurtured by another culture one that comprises of oral tales of gods, devils and cunning tricksters passed down by generations of slaves. As inheritor of two vitally rich cultures, in his writing, he utilizes one, then the other and finally creates out of the two his own personalized style.

  2. 'It seems that history is to blame.' (Joyce, Ulysses) Discuss the representation of ...

    The historian prevails over the history and the audience over the historian. One cannot prove either way whether Pyper's stories of the past are true or not. Yet surely the focus should fall upon why he chooses to tell such stories.

  1. Question 3 History

    is how Source J starts. This sentence, in a way, sums up how the men came to the conclusion that winning the war would not have been possible without women. It's as if they have finally realised the value of women to the country.

  2. Why did Roosevelt win the 1932 elections?

    Furthermore, the situation had come to a point where the public even battled the police and threats to the judges also started taking place. The bonus army consisted of 10,000 marchers, who were formerly soldiers in the First World War. These ex-soldiers were promised pension to be received in 1945.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work