• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History GCSE Sources Coursework – The Munich Agreement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History GCSE Sources Coursework - The Munich Agreement By R.E. Warden 1) What can you learn from source A about Chamberlain's policy towards Germany? (4) Source A tells me that Chamberlain did not want to go to war with Germany because he thought Germany was a power to be reckoned with, especially since she had Italy's support. He feared that if it came to war Italy could take advantage of its position in the Mediterranean to attack British territory there (such as Gibraltar) and more importantly stop British shipping to and from her empire, which was very important to Britain. It also shows that Chamberlain thought that if it came to war, Hitler could hurt France where she was weakest. Because the source is an unofficial, private document it can accurately show us Chamberlain's opinion, and though it gives us a good idea of his intent, it does not properly show us his official policy. The source shows that Chamberlain did not think Britain's armaments were strong enough to stand against Germany's, and that therefore they must buy time to build up arms, just in case. It also tells me that Chamberlain felt that the dictators could still be reasoned with and were not devoid of any honour or reasonableness, and that he still held some hope of coming to an agreement to suit everybody. He thought that if he appeased Hitler and Mussolini by helping to fix their grievances, they would be happy and the peace of Europe would be assured. 2) Study A and B. In what ways does source B add to your understanding of Chamberlain's foreign policy? ...read more.

Middle

However, source G shows us that Hitler was not to be trusted and as soon as Chamberlain had got Czechoslovakia and France to agree, he changed his demands to more unreasonable ones, which Hitler hoped would ultimately insure the disintegration of Czechoslovakia, by taking large amounts of land from her. These demands were completely unreasonable, even for the peacemaker Chamberlain, and only when Britain and France threatened to go to war did Hitler reduce his demands a little, although his demands mentioned in source G are so unreasonable it could almost be said he was deliberately aiming high so when he was forced to compromise he would get the better deal. Source H shows that Hitler could feel confident about making these demands as Chamberlain was still set upon peace despite all he had seen Hitler capable of. Chamberlain makes clear in this speech that he thinks all Hitler is after is Czechoslovakia and that Britain will not go to war just to protect one small country. ii) Relations between Britain and Czechoslovakia in September 1938? (6) When Hitler made his first demands of Chamberlain, Chamberlain agreed and then informed Czechoslovakia (source E), even though it would severely weaken Czechoslovakia (a state that Britain had helped to set up). Britain and France practically forced her to agree to Hitler's demands, going so far as to refuse to support her if she did not. The Czechoslovak government was not even consulted in the future of its own country, which as source F shows was hurtful to the Czechs. ...read more.

Conclusion

As source B shows, Chamberlain was not willing to take the risk of going to war in 1938 just to protect one small country. Source A shows us that as early as January 1938 Chamberlain was thinking about building up British armaments. I think that the lack of war in1938 was due to Chamberlain although I would not call it courage. He made the agreement because he was convinced that the British public wanted peace more than anything (source J shows that at least some of them did). He was afraid of what another war would do to Britain if she were not ready, especially since the Spanish civil war in which the German Condor Legion decimated the Basque town of Guernica. Chamberlain was excessively afraid of German air strength as he was unfamiliar with the effects of bombing and feared that London could become another Guernica, with hundreds of thousands of casualties. It was thought that the entire German Luftwaffe would head for Britain as soon as war broke out and people greatly overestimated its size and strength. However optimistic Chamberlain chose to be, he must have known that if Britain continued to get involved in Europe's affairs then sooner or later she would have to fight Germany. Although war was avoided in 1938 it was not avoided altogether and if anything it convinced Hitler that Britain was soft and irresolute and would do nothing by force to stop his further conquest of Europe. This meant that he persevered in his plans to expand Germany without worrying about Britain. Total number of words: 2696 Rachel E. Warden History Coursework: Munich ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Assignment 1, Coursework

    The Germans who felt that Germany had been betrayed were totally horrified by the treaty. The politicians who signed the 'armistice' were called the 'November criminals'. Ebert, the Weimar's Republic first democratic president after the Kaiser abdicated, was facing a very hard position related to the treaty.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    set fire to the Reichstag all by himself'. Source C really has no evidence in it either way to suggest who set fire to the Reichstag. It shows that the Reichstag fire was useful to the Nazis, and you could argue that this means they set fire to it to gain support and to blame the Communists, as

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    The sources I have studied are all going to be put to use in the final part of this essay: how far do they collectively prove that the LoN was to blame for Mussolini's conquest of Abyssinia? Source A shows a number of ways in which they prove that the LoN was to blame for the conquest of Abyssinia.

  2. Why was the Munich Agreement signed on 29 September 1938?

    Czechoslovakia was fiercely against the proposal as no country would willingly give up land or people particularly as the Sudetenland had valuable resources. The Soviet Union was also fiercely against the proposal as the Sudetenland contained much of Czechoslovakia's defences and if it was given to Germany then the rest

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Explain your answer. Source H was from a history book in 1974. Basically, Source H states that the Nazi party had hoped to knock down the Communist party after the elections in order for them to gain 50% of the Reichstag seats.

  2. adolf hitler

    Although other races would resist this process, the Aryan race had a duty to control the world. This would be difficult and force would have to be used, but it could be done. To support this view he gave the example of how the British Empire had controlled a quarter

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    These are just some of the reasons why this document is considered to be purely Nazi propaganda, designed mainly to persuade the German population to abandon support of the Communist party. Both sources also agree that the Nazi party has exploited the situation to gain a higher degree of control over the German government and its people.

  2. Why was the Munich agreement signed?

    There were also political reasons for signing the agreement: there was some speculation within Britain as to whether the public would support another war( a poll from March 1938 states that only 33% were in favour of a war)and politicians did not want to risk losing their popularity if the public did not want a war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work