• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

History of Ireland

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the years after 1000 AD the cultural and social landscape of Ireland changed a great deal. The influx of foreigners in Ireland had intentions to control, settle, and exploit the people and land and had a profound effect on the otherwise autonomous peoples who existed there. Most people assume the first people to inhabit Ireland were the Celtic speaking natives, who arrived between 700 and 500 BC. However, the island has been inhabited since as far back as 8000BC when nomads crossed the Irish Sea from continental Europe on ice bridges. 1Before the arrival of any other groups in Ireland the people of the island were very inward looking and not concerned with the events which took place in the rest of Europe. This paper will detail the effects that the newcomers had on the physical and social climate of Ireland and especially how and why the English were able to establish a control over the island which lasted for over 800 years. The primary unit of the Irish society was the family, each having its own lands. The source of power which gave rise to kingships and other forms of authority was cattle or other livestock given to families for use on their lands. In return for this families pledged their loyalty and services to their superior, such as in battle. As a result cattle became the measure of wealth and not lands as it was in the rest of Europe. 2 There was no single authority in Ireland to whom all answered; rather, historians noted any number of kingships on the island at any time. The kings were constantly fighting amongst themselves in an attempt to gain power and wealth. Perhaps even more divisive was the infighting amongst their own families; often, even brothers would fight each other dividing the established hierarchy. 3 This created increased divisions between competing clans on the island and made any attempt to rule over it seemingly impossible as no Irishman was able to accomplish it. ...read more.

Middle

Using monies loaned to him by his wealthy friends and giving promises of lands and titles to those who helped him he was able to muster a small force. He was also able to assure promises of more men in the coming years from someone who would become a predominant figure in the years to come, Richard fitz Gilbert also called Strongbow. This man was eager to help because he was out of favor with Henry as he did not support him in the English Civil War. To Strongbow Dermot promised his daughter in marriage, making him the heir to whatever territories they gained. Using his new allies, Dermot returned in 1167 and reinstated himself in his old capital where for the next two years he waged small scale wars against his old enemies. As his enemies were still pre-occupied fighting each other he was able to regain most of his former lands and to live in peace as he awaited his next wave.14 Having been the first Irishman to look to England for help in Ireland he was branded "Dermot of the foreigners" and is still considered the greatest traitor in Irish history as his invitation marked the beginning of the end of Irish sovereignty in the minds of many Irish.15 It is tragic that the Irish peoples continued to fight against one another even after knowing that Dermot had aligned himself with the most powerful King Europe. Should they have worked together to throw off the English the course of Irish history would have undoubtedly been different. They would have saved themselves from the centuries of horror and catastrophic neglect which were to follow. As promised, Dermot's new allies arrived in Ireland in 1170 numbering nearly 2000 men. These newcomers held a tremendous advantage over the natives in the form of their advanced weapons. They possessed archers which proved to be an essential part of their success in the conquests that followed. ...read more.

Conclusion

If the taxes have been forgiven in these years the displacement and death of over a million Irish could have been prevented. The Irish world was self-concerned and to an extent underdeveloped before the arrival of any foreign people, when power was finally returned to the Irish people in 1922 the entire landscape had changed. The distressing point in this fact is that the Irish had very little to do with shaping their country for over 800 years, instead it was shaped by the prerogatives of outsiders. The foreigners to settle in Ireland did also leave some positive marks such as key cities, trade partnerships, and the development of Irish nationalism. The most apparent sign of English influence today is that they remain the highest authority in Northern Ireland. If any lessons are to be learned from how the Irish handled the arrival of the Vikings and the English it is that a country divided against itself will fall. If they have worked together the fate of the Irish people, and Europe, would have been much different. 1 History of Ireland. 2005. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia. 27 Feb. 2005. < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Ireland> 2 Michael Dolley, Anglo Norman Ireland (Dublin 1972), 54. 3 Wikipedia, The History of Ireland. 4Ibid. 5 Daibhi O Croinin, Early Medieval Ireland (New York 1995), 234. 6 Ibid., p 237. 7 Ibid.,p 260-270. 8 Qtd. In: James Lydon , The Lordship of Ireland in the Middle Ages(Portland 2003), 14. 9 Ibid., p 15-16. 10 Wikipedia, The History of Ireland. 11 Chauvire, History Of Ireland, 35-36. 12 Lydon , The Lordship , 32. 13 Ibid., p 31-34. 14 Ibid.,p 35-37. 15 Wikipedia, The History of Ireland. 16 Lydon , The Lordship , 38. 17 Ibid.,p 38 18 Lydon, The Lordship, 39-40. 19 Ibid.,p 42-44. 20 Wikipedia, The History of Ireland. 21 Lydon , The Lordship , 43-44. 22 Ibid.,p 47. 23 Wikipedia, The History of Ireland. 24 Lydon , The Lordship , 50-51. 25 Chauvire, History of Ireland, 105-106. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    1918 Sinn Fein sets up the Dail This was a provisional government in Ireland, and it set up its own courts and even collected taxes. Its acceptance by the Irish people showed that Ireland had no loyalty to Britain and that Britain therefore had no legitimacy in ruling Ireland.

  2. Conflict in Ireland

    Although when internment was introduced it provoked a wave of shootings and explosions killing 143 people the violence began to die down by the end of the year. Meanwhile the government had created 7000 new jobs and built 14662 new houses. All in all internment appeared to have been successful.

  1. How far do the sources support the view that Irish Nationalism was an 'increasingly ...

    This is a further complication in the 'many branched tree' of nationalism. Source six, a secondary source, shows the Church's position towards nationalism and claims that the Church had 'inevitable reservations (about)...the justifiability of violence' but otherwise supported nationalists. Only when restraint proved impossible would it follow for fear of losing the power to lead.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    By its use of this Gaelic name, Sinn Fein was demanding its own autonomy, and Irish unity was its ultimate end. In that respect, the slogan was very simplistic. It believed that the only way to get rid of the British was through the barrel of a gun, rather than through any rational argument.

  1. How Effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders advance their Cause in the years ...

    On Easter Monday, 1916, Pearse and Connolly and no more than about one thousand men seized a number of strategic locations in Dublin, including the General Post Office on the steps of which Pearse declared Ireland's freedom and the birth of the Republic.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Although J.C. Beckett writes that "No other single person has left such an unmistakable mark on the history of Ireland", in general, O'Connell's effectiveness was limited. Hoppen argues that for him, "the people" were the Catholics for whom he achieved virtually full political and civil rights by the Emancipation.

  1. Why was Ireland partioned in 1922?

    As the Nationalists were so determined to achieve Home Rule, Redmond, the leader of the group, formed a Nationalists modern political party that started to successfully win seats regularly in Parliament. As we know already, Unionists opposed Home Rule so they decided to elect Carson as the Unionist leader in

  2. Biran Friel, Making History, Historical Background

    countryside and partly to get into the Republic"; he left partly because of the political situation in the North, where he says, "The sense of frustration which I felt under the tight and immovable Unionist regime became distasteful". He had joined the Nationalist Party in Derry but had left in 1967, disappointed with its lack of initiative.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work