• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Project. I am going to focus on the differences between military systems between the Hittites, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Persians

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐History of military In ancient times land was divided into many different areas, each area led by its own leader and inhabited by its own people. All of these people had different cultures, structure of government, trading system, art, religion and military system. Even though some countries are located near each other, their culture, beliefs and ways of doing certain things varied. In this essay, I am going to focus on the differences between military systems between the Hittites, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Persians. Countries were at constant war. It was the time when nations were forced to develop their own military systems in order to keep peace in their own land or invade new land if necessary. They had to improve their warfare tactics and establish a well-organized and structured army. This gave rise to new advanced weaponry and cunning warfare tactics. Different nations and people came up with new inventions and ideas, which gave them a head start when going to battle with their enemies. The Hittites are well known for their strategic thinking and using situations for their own benefit. ...read more.


This was a significant development in sea warfare, since it was becoming a great importance during the fifth century. Their advancement put themselves into a strong position compared to the others and therefore they were known as the most skilful shipbuilders and navigators of their time. One of the most feared army of all time was the Assyrian army. They were known as the most barbaric, brutal and remorseless people of that time. Not only were they successful in the area of weaponry, but they were also known to have special technical units. Unlike the Hittites, Assyrians used cavalry instead of chariots, which gave them a stronger position in battle. Also their usage of iron in weaponry and ability to break through brick walls made them hard to beat. Having said, even though the Assyrians had a powerful army, the Chaldeans did manage to take control of much of the territory that the Assyrians had ruled. However, when the other people went on conquering lands and contributing new ideas to the civilization, the Chaldeans did not provide any new thoughts. ...read more.


The armament that the Persians used was advanced. The weapons they used were the bow and the short sword, but sometimes they also used the spear. During battles they used elephants and scythed chariots. They had also mail armour, which was used to protect both their horses and men themselves. The cavalry wore Median dress, bronze helmets and horsehair crest. The Persian army had also an elite force, which we know as ?the immortals?. Their armament was different compared to the normal Persian soldiers?, since they were armed heavily with bows and quivers. Most of these armies achieved a lot during their times, conquered lands and made technical advancements in weaponry. Nevertheless, they were all different in areas such as weaponry, structure and tactics. To sum it all up, Hittites, Hebrews, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Lydians, Chaldeans and Persians all had a different military structure, and therefore contributed different things to our civilization. They all had their strongest areas, which worked for their own benefits during war and battle. SOURCES Holt, Rinehart & Winston World History: People and Nations Charles Sturt University Ancient History The Persian Army http://hsc.csu.edu.au History World http://history-world.org Hittie, Persia http://angelfire.com/empire2/unkeptgoose Tour Egypt http://touregypt.net ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    During the years of the Roman's conquest their warfare technology was much better than anything anyone else had and this was a crucial factor in deciding why the Romans were superior to the Celts in battle.


    But that slavery meant more different term to what the Europeans served them as. "Slavery", in African cultures was generally more like 'contract agreed to be servant'. Slaves in Africa were not enslaved for life. They were paid wages and were able to freedom.

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    But towards the end of a hard days battle Benteen's now united force escaped when the Indians broke off the fight, they had learned of the other two columns of soldiers were coming towards them, so they fled. They received order to support Custer but were unable because they were under such heavy attack.

  2. US military History - A long telescope allows us to see how warfare evolved ...

    This explains how "small groups of aggressive intruders not only overthrew but for a time sustained power among peoples who greatly outnumbered them."? Take him unaware by surprise attacks where he is unprepared. Hit him suddenly with shock troops. Sun Tzu, The Art of War A great horse, in a sense becomes a king.

  1. English civil war project - causes, battles and tactics

    was that charles 'won' because the road to london was open for him, but charles falied to take advantage of this opportunity. By the time his troops reached Reading, Essex had regained London and charles' troops never again had a chance to capture the capital.

  2. Sumer project

    in 2525 BC on a stele called the Stele of Vultures. The king of Lagash lead a Sumerian army consisting mostly of infantry. The infantrymen carried spears, equipped with copper helmets and leather shields. The spearmen were arranged in a phalanx formation, which required training and discipline, and so shows they were professional soldiers.

  1. Working history project diary

    Another two different men approached me both black they were carrying ropes and chains, one of the other men had a whip. The biggest man dropped to the floor and held me down so I couldn't get away as another man attached chains round each of my wrists.

  2. Describing Advances in Weaponry in WW2.

    This one invention caused all other countries to start developing their own bombs after realising the devastation is can cause and how efficient it is as a weapon. Weaponry in this small time period has advanced and has become better due to great inventions and ideas.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work