• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Project. I am going to focus on the differences between military systems between the Hittites, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Persians

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐History of military In ancient times land was divided into many different areas, each area led by its own leader and inhabited by its own people. All of these people had different cultures, structure of government, trading system, art, religion and military system. Even though some countries are located near each other, their culture, beliefs and ways of doing certain things varied. In this essay, I am going to focus on the differences between military systems between the Hittites, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Persians. Countries were at constant war. It was the time when nations were forced to develop their own military systems in order to keep peace in their own land or invade new land if necessary. They had to improve their warfare tactics and establish a well-organized and structured army. This gave rise to new advanced weaponry and cunning warfare tactics. Different nations and people came up with new inventions and ideas, which gave them a head start when going to battle with their enemies. The Hittites are well known for their strategic thinking and using situations for their own benefit. ...read more.

Middle

This was a significant development in sea warfare, since it was becoming a great importance during the fifth century. Their advancement put themselves into a strong position compared to the others and therefore they were known as the most skilful shipbuilders and navigators of their time. One of the most feared army of all time was the Assyrian army. They were known as the most barbaric, brutal and remorseless people of that time. Not only were they successful in the area of weaponry, but they were also known to have special technical units. Unlike the Hittites, Assyrians used cavalry instead of chariots, which gave them a stronger position in battle. Also their usage of iron in weaponry and ability to break through brick walls made them hard to beat. Having said, even though the Assyrians had a powerful army, the Chaldeans did manage to take control of much of the territory that the Assyrians had ruled. However, when the other people went on conquering lands and contributing new ideas to the civilization, the Chaldeans did not provide any new thoughts. ...read more.

Conclusion

The armament that the Persians used was advanced. The weapons they used were the bow and the short sword, but sometimes they also used the spear. During battles they used elephants and scythed chariots. They had also mail armour, which was used to protect both their horses and men themselves. The cavalry wore Median dress, bronze helmets and horsehair crest. The Persian army had also an elite force, which we know as ?the immortals?. Their armament was different compared to the normal Persian soldiers?, since they were armed heavily with bows and quivers. Most of these armies achieved a lot during their times, conquered lands and made technical advancements in weaponry. Nevertheless, they were all different in areas such as weaponry, structure and tactics. To sum it all up, Hittites, Hebrews, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Lydians, Chaldeans and Persians all had a different military structure, and therefore contributed different things to our civilization. They all had their strongest areas, which worked for their own benefits during war and battle. SOURCES Holt, Rinehart & Winston World History: People and Nations Charles Sturt University Ancient History The Persian Army http://hsc.csu.edu.au History World http://history-world.org Hittie, Persia http://angelfire.com/empire2/unkeptgoose Tour Egypt http://touregypt.net ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    During the years of the Roman's conquest their warfare technology was much better than anything anyone else had and this was a crucial factor in deciding why the Romans were superior to the Celts in battle.

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    and only a further 75 soldiers were killed from the rest of the whole army shortly leading up to the battle of The little BigHorn, such as in Reno and Benteen's troops. After the battle, the Indians stripped the bodies and mutilated all the uniformed soldiers, believing that the soul

  1. US military History - A long telescope allows us to see how warfare evolved ...

    It is not surprising that kings were made by the first great horses.? Keegan points out that after time, even the most dismal of armies can become accustomed to the familiarity of a weapon system and even develop a counter move.

  2. Sumer project

    The Sumerian military used carts harnessed to chariots. The early chariots were less effective than later designs. Some drawings have suggested that these chariots served as only transport, though the crew carried battle-axes and lances. The Sumerian chariot had four or two wheels manned by a crew of two and harnessed to four onagers.

  1. Working history project diary

    Another two different men approached me both black they were carrying ropes and chains, one of the other men had a whip. The biggest man dropped to the floor and held me down so I couldn't get away as another man attached chains round each of my wrists.

  2. Knightly Warfare. The knights primary and considered most well known weapon was the ...

    sword and the pommel being the design at the very end of the handle (Med. Weapons 1). Not all long swords, however, required the strict usage of two hands. Generalizations about the long sword can vary widely, depending on the grip.

  1. Describing Advances in Weaponry in WW2.

    This one invention caused all other countries to start developing their own bombs after realising the devastation is can cause and how efficient it is as a weapon. Weaponry in this small time period has advanced and has become better due to great inventions and ideas.

  2. World War 1 Project - causes, weapons and the finish.

    The more modern tank was not developed until just before the end of the war. It could carry 10 men, had a revolving turret and could reach 4mph.(It was used in ww2 though ï) Planes Planes were also used for the first time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work