• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Project. I am going to focus on the differences between military systems between the Hittites, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Persians

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐History of military In ancient times land was divided into many different areas, each area led by its own leader and inhabited by its own people. All of these people had different cultures, structure of government, trading system, art, religion and military system. Even though some countries are located near each other, their culture, beliefs and ways of doing certain things varied. In this essay, I am going to focus on the differences between military systems between the Hittites, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Chaldeans and Persians. Countries were at constant war. It was the time when nations were forced to develop their own military systems in order to keep peace in their own land or invade new land if necessary. They had to improve their warfare tactics and establish a well-organized and structured army. This gave rise to new advanced weaponry and cunning warfare tactics. Different nations and people came up with new inventions and ideas, which gave them a head start when going to battle with their enemies. The Hittites are well known for their strategic thinking and using situations for their own benefit. ...read more.


This was a significant development in sea warfare, since it was becoming a great importance during the fifth century. Their advancement put themselves into a strong position compared to the others and therefore they were known as the most skilful shipbuilders and navigators of their time. One of the most feared army of all time was the Assyrian army. They were known as the most barbaric, brutal and remorseless people of that time. Not only were they successful in the area of weaponry, but they were also known to have special technical units. Unlike the Hittites, Assyrians used cavalry instead of chariots, which gave them a stronger position in battle. Also their usage of iron in weaponry and ability to break through brick walls made them hard to beat. Having said, even though the Assyrians had a powerful army, the Chaldeans did manage to take control of much of the territory that the Assyrians had ruled. However, when the other people went on conquering lands and contributing new ideas to the civilization, the Chaldeans did not provide any new thoughts. ...read more.


The armament that the Persians used was advanced. The weapons they used were the bow and the short sword, but sometimes they also used the spear. During battles they used elephants and scythed chariots. They had also mail armour, which was used to protect both their horses and men themselves. The cavalry wore Median dress, bronze helmets and horsehair crest. The Persian army had also an elite force, which we know as ?the immortals?. Their armament was different compared to the normal Persian soldiers?, since they were armed heavily with bows and quivers. Most of these armies achieved a lot during their times, conquered lands and made technical advancements in weaponry. Nevertheless, they were all different in areas such as weaponry, structure and tactics. To sum it all up, Hittites, Hebrews, Phoenicians, Assyrians, Lydians, Chaldeans and Persians all had a different military structure, and therefore contributed different things to our civilization. They all had their strongest areas, which worked for their own benefits during war and battle. SOURCES Holt, Rinehart & Winston World History: People and Nations Charles Sturt University Ancient History The Persian Army http://hsc.csu.edu.au History World http://history-world.org Hittie, Persia http://angelfire.com/empire2/unkeptgoose Tour Egypt http://touregypt.net ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays


    But that slavery meant more different term to what the Europeans served them as. "Slavery", in African cultures was generally more like 'contract agreed to be servant'. Slaves in Africa were not enslaved for life. They were paid wages and were able to freedom.

  2. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    he thought Custer was a brave warrior and died a brave man. However, here we see that he didn't know who Custer was so could not have known what Custer was like in battle because it is unlikely that he would have been watched by Low Dog during the fast

  1. Cats in Ancient Egypt

    Most cat mummies have been indentified as tabbies but a few are considered jungle cats. Cat tombs and cemeteries have been located across Egypt including Abydos, Dendra, Saqqara, Koptos, Tell Basta and Thebes.

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    the Romans were well trained and organization they met their match in the Celts who often terrified the Romans into defeat. Also I come to the conclusion that the Romans were not superior to the Celts in their tactics. A famous writer who agrees with me proves this.

  1. Knightly Warfare. The knights primary and considered most well known weapon was the ...

    One variation of the long sword that became widely popular on the battlefield was the claymore. While the long sword left room for the option for using two hands or not, the claymore was strictly a two-handed sword used in the late medieval periods (Gravett 27).

  2. Consider the treatment of history in Julian Barnes's A History of The World in ...

    and his son Jonathan and of the Roman soldiers casting lots for the crucified Jesus's garments. What is the final effect of these intertextual references? They illustrate the fact that from the beginnings of time humans have sought to validate their own status by turning on those they choose to designate the "unclean."

  1. The battle of britain and the battle of the atlantic project.

    A handful of U-boats operating on the North American and Caribbean seaboards area in the first half of 1942 sank nearly 500 Allied ships. The period of this campaign, called Operation Drumbeat, was the second 'happy time' for the German submariners Intelligence was the other major factor in this second Battle of the Atlantic.

  2. Describing Advances in Weaponry in WW2.

    Tanks got heavier and bigger with more layers of armour to add to the durability. Planes became faster in that time with lighter and more durable material and they also got upgrades such as better weaponry and better armour. The atomic bomb was developed quickly to end the war in Japan.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work