• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kashmala Khan History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst 1.) What was distinctive about the methods used by the WPSU in the campaign for women's suffrage? The text calls this terrorism. Does this seem fair? A: The methods used by the WSPU for its campaign for women's suffrage were fairly extreme. They chained themselves to railings, wrote 'Votes for Women' in acid on golf courses, disrupted the postal service (by making arson attacks on post boxes) attacked MPs physically and verbally, wrote graffiti on church walls and government buildings, broke windows, and burnt down empty buildings. Emmeline Pankhurst motto was ' Deeds not Words'. She encouraged militant like approach to the government but it would be debatable to call these methods terrorism. In fact, the Suffragettes started off relatively peacefully. It was only in 1905 that the organisation created a stir when Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney interrupted a political meeting in Manchester to ask Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey if they believed in women should have the right to vote. ...read more.

Middle

Newcastle and Bradford also suffered heavily from these attacks. Other places attacked included Bath, Southampton, Richmond, Edinburgh, Kirkcaldy, Southport, Ilkeston, Hasting and Cardiff. In October 1912 Emmeline urged that ' those of you who can express your militancy by going to the House of Commons and refusing to leave do so. Those of you who can express militancy by facing party mobs at Cabinet ministers' meetings do so. Those of you who can break- windows break them. Those of you who can still further attack the secret idol of property do so'. Every time that Emmeline was imprisoned, it excited a strong response. Her conviction in April 1913 was followed, according to the WSPU, by the biggest revolutionary outbreak in Britain since the struggle for the 1832 Reform Bill. It seems that the campaign was co-ordinated quite successfully with sympathy attracted to the WSPU (Cat and Mouse Act). Even though she did not write a template for WSPU activity, Emmeline Pankhurst undoubtedly framed the policy by her high profile speeches and her incitement to violence 3.) ...read more.

Conclusion

In is vital to keep in mind that up until 1912 Emmeline Pankhurst continued to use constitutional means, speaking all over Britain to various groups, demonstrating, petitions, trying to persuade MPs to listen and support Conciliation Bills. It was when these methods failed that the WSPU resorted to violence. Emmeline always insisted that the militant campaign was targeted against property not human life. So in conclusion it is clear that Emmeline had tried hard to use the 'pen rather than the sword' however it was when that failed did the WSPU resort to undemocratic means. 5.) Why did Sylvia and Christabel part Company in 1914? A: Christabel helped her mother Emmeline out with the war effort, however Sylvia was deeply opposed to the war. She disagreed with the WSPU strong support of the war effort and joined with Charlotte Despond to form the Women's Peace Army and organisation, which demanded a negotiated peace. During the war she joined Dr. Barbara Tchaykovsky to open four mother- and-baby clinics in London. Sylvia was a supporter of the Russian Revolution and in 1917 visited the country and met Lenin. She ended up arguing with him over the issue of censorship. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    Without the First World War taking place, many historians believe that the Suffrage war with the government would have continued and propelled to such an extortionate length that there may have been a revolution. This links to the fact that suffrage had been taking place for more than a century,

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    It was after all these victories when the American troops came in 1918. They brought a lot of much needed resources that really did speed up the ending of the war but the defeat of the Central Powers would have probably happened without the help of the Americans.

  1. Gallipoli Questions

    The troops thus underestimated there task and were casual, which led to slaughter at V beach, because they didn't know about machine-gun placements. This article is extremely likely to be reliable, because it is from a GCSE textbook and the author will have looked at a variety of primary and

  2. womens crsk history

    get the vote, they would just vote for the people who are good looking or something along those lines. Source C shows that women cannot deal with politics and that they should stick with their traditional role. The Source also shows that women would do anything to gain the right to vote.

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    Also it is just figures we do not know why these figures were published and there are no text to tell us more information therefore the source given is limited. it just doesn't tell us enough information on the great depression we just know what happens before the great depression and after but not when it is taking place.

  2. Modern history

    According to Derrick Murphy, 'although British women did not have the right to vote in national elections, they did play an active role in politics'. This is true since party's such as the Conservative's and the Labour established smaller political branches in which women were very active such as the Primrose League of 1883 which consisted of 49% women membership.

  1. Votes For women - history

    The sources are also dissimilar in a few ways. Source B has a two-way argument about the women receiving the vote. Source C clearly is in support of it, but only supports the calm, easier going Suffragists. The cartoon also shows that the Suffragists are the upper class women - who are stylish as well as polished.

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    Therefore, this source could lead us to believe that women did not contribute particularly well during the war years. Source G, on the other hand is very different, this source is taken from a school textbook published in the 1980's, and it is therefore a secondary source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work