• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kashmala Khan History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst 1.) What was distinctive about the methods used by the WPSU in the campaign for women's suffrage? The text calls this terrorism. Does this seem fair? A: The methods used by the WSPU for its campaign for women's suffrage were fairly extreme. They chained themselves to railings, wrote 'Votes for Women' in acid on golf courses, disrupted the postal service (by making arson attacks on post boxes) attacked MPs physically and verbally, wrote graffiti on church walls and government buildings, broke windows, and burnt down empty buildings. Emmeline Pankhurst motto was ' Deeds not Words'. She encouraged militant like approach to the government but it would be debatable to call these methods terrorism. In fact, the Suffragettes started off relatively peacefully. It was only in 1905 that the organisation created a stir when Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney interrupted a political meeting in Manchester to ask Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey if they believed in women should have the right to vote. ...read more.

Middle

Newcastle and Bradford also suffered heavily from these attacks. Other places attacked included Bath, Southampton, Richmond, Edinburgh, Kirkcaldy, Southport, Ilkeston, Hasting and Cardiff. In October 1912 Emmeline urged that ' those of you who can express your militancy by going to the House of Commons and refusing to leave do so. Those of you who can express militancy by facing party mobs at Cabinet ministers' meetings do so. Those of you who can break- windows break them. Those of you who can still further attack the secret idol of property do so'. Every time that Emmeline was imprisoned, it excited a strong response. Her conviction in April 1913 was followed, according to the WSPU, by the biggest revolutionary outbreak in Britain since the struggle for the 1832 Reform Bill. It seems that the campaign was co-ordinated quite successfully with sympathy attracted to the WSPU (Cat and Mouse Act). Even though she did not write a template for WSPU activity, Emmeline Pankhurst undoubtedly framed the policy by her high profile speeches and her incitement to violence 3.) ...read more.

Conclusion

In is vital to keep in mind that up until 1912 Emmeline Pankhurst continued to use constitutional means, speaking all over Britain to various groups, demonstrating, petitions, trying to persuade MPs to listen and support Conciliation Bills. It was when these methods failed that the WSPU resorted to violence. Emmeline always insisted that the militant campaign was targeted against property not human life. So in conclusion it is clear that Emmeline had tried hard to use the 'pen rather than the sword' however it was when that failed did the WSPU resort to undemocratic means. 5.) Why did Sylvia and Christabel part Company in 1914? A: Christabel helped her mother Emmeline out with the war effort, however Sylvia was deeply opposed to the war. She disagreed with the WSPU strong support of the war effort and joined with Charlotte Despond to form the Women's Peace Army and organisation, which demanded a negotiated peace. During the war she joined Dr. Barbara Tchaykovsky to open four mother- and-baby clinics in London. Sylvia was a supporter of the Russian Revolution and in 1917 visited the country and met Lenin. She ended up arguing with him over the issue of censorship. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The Germans released poison gas, which wafted over on the wind to the British trenches. Chlorine gas worked by suffocating the lungs. Men would drop clutching their chests in agony, as they were violently sick. They all died a slow death of unbearable pain.

  2. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    had fought before the war, no one would have taken the cause seriously, and the government would have kept on postponing their decision, as they believed that it was not an important decision to be put forward in parliament. The violence that was taken by these women was irresponsible but showed that they meant what they said.

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    something was needed to be done and to get the government to do something about it. The most famous of these marches came from the ship building town Jarrow in the north east of England. In 1935 three quarters of Jarrow's workers had no job and many ship yards were closed down.

  2. Gallipoli Questions

    I feel this because one of the main reasons the campaign failed was because of the extreme heat and the lack of knowledge of the terrain and surroundings. This source is illustrated in Source F, as you can see just how narrow the land is and also, how many forts and defensive structures there are.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    The fact that the government were advertising for women to work in munitions suggests to us that not enough women were enrolling of their own accord and so a push needed to be made to get more women to join.

  2. The Struggle For The Emancipation Of Women

    In 1903 the W.S.P.U. formed from the N.U.W.S.S., when they first formed their motto was 'deeds not words'. The W.S.P.U formed because the methods of the N.U.W.S.S weren't working. They had been campaigning since 1867 and not a lot had changed in terms of women getting the vote.

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    The Upper Class women still did nothing they hadn't changed much Economically, they didn't want to. There was progress economically after 1870 as a wider range of jobs became available for the working class women, and also a wider range of more professional jobs for the Middle class women.

  2. womens crsk history

    Inadvertently, however, it is showing that women are very important; if a woman is not there to do her job, then everything in the house goes wrong. This shows that a woman is very important in everyday life. In conclusion, I think that Sources A and C do not agree

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work