• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst.

Extracts from this document...


Kashmala Khan History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst 1.) What was distinctive about the methods used by the WPSU in the campaign for women's suffrage? The text calls this terrorism. Does this seem fair? A: The methods used by the WSPU for its campaign for women's suffrage were fairly extreme. They chained themselves to railings, wrote 'Votes for Women' in acid on golf courses, disrupted the postal service (by making arson attacks on post boxes) attacked MPs physically and verbally, wrote graffiti on church walls and government buildings, broke windows, and burnt down empty buildings. Emmeline Pankhurst motto was ' Deeds not Words'. She encouraged militant like approach to the government but it would be debatable to call these methods terrorism. In fact, the Suffragettes started off relatively peacefully. It was only in 1905 that the organisation created a stir when Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney interrupted a political meeting in Manchester to ask Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey if they believed in women should have the right to vote. ...read more.


Newcastle and Bradford also suffered heavily from these attacks. Other places attacked included Bath, Southampton, Richmond, Edinburgh, Kirkcaldy, Southport, Ilkeston, Hasting and Cardiff. In October 1912 Emmeline urged that ' those of you who can express your militancy by going to the House of Commons and refusing to leave do so. Those of you who can express militancy by facing party mobs at Cabinet ministers' meetings do so. Those of you who can break- windows break them. Those of you who can still further attack the secret idol of property do so'. Every time that Emmeline was imprisoned, it excited a strong response. Her conviction in April 1913 was followed, according to the WSPU, by the biggest revolutionary outbreak in Britain since the struggle for the 1832 Reform Bill. It seems that the campaign was co-ordinated quite successfully with sympathy attracted to the WSPU (Cat and Mouse Act). Even though she did not write a template for WSPU activity, Emmeline Pankhurst undoubtedly framed the policy by her high profile speeches and her incitement to violence 3.) ...read more.


In is vital to keep in mind that up until 1912 Emmeline Pankhurst continued to use constitutional means, speaking all over Britain to various groups, demonstrating, petitions, trying to persuade MPs to listen and support Conciliation Bills. It was when these methods failed that the WSPU resorted to violence. Emmeline always insisted that the militant campaign was targeted against property not human life. So in conclusion it is clear that Emmeline had tried hard to use the 'pen rather than the sword' however it was when that failed did the WSPU resort to undemocratic means. 5.) Why did Sylvia and Christabel part Company in 1914? A: Christabel helped her mother Emmeline out with the war effort, however Sylvia was deeply opposed to the war. She disagreed with the WSPU strong support of the war effort and joined with Charlotte Despond to form the Women's Peace Army and organisation, which demanded a negotiated peace. During the war she joined Dr. Barbara Tchaykovsky to open four mother- and-baby clinics in London. Sylvia was a supporter of the Russian Revolution and in 1917 visited the country and met Lenin. She ended up arguing with him over the issue of censorship. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Sometimes his bombardments would last for weeks. The place when the bombardment was most successful was on the Hindenburg line, the bombardments simply blew it away and as you know the Hindenburg line breakthrough was the most important event in winning the war.

  2. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    Therefore Jarrow had to do something to show that they need help so the Jarrow crusade took place. The Jarrow crusade was lead by Miss Ellen Wilkinson, MP for Jarrow, carrying a petition for presentation to the house of command which was signed by 11,572 people.

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    But the women's war effort changed this stereotype, and could not now exclude women from voting. Suffrage had been gradually extending for the last 100 years anyway, and the inclusion of women was bound to come at some time. The suffragette activity and the women's war effort were simply the triggers that helped it to happen in 1918.

  2. Gallipoli Questions

    She also talks about how Churchill's errors of judgment led to our downfall. Need I say more? This source is explicitly stating that poor planning and Churchill led to the failure of the campaign.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    The fact that the government were advertising for women to work in munitions suggests to us that not enough women were enrolling of their own accord and so a push needed to be made to get more women to join.

  2. The Struggle For The Emancipation Of Women

    In 1903 the W.S.P.U. formed from the N.U.W.S.S., when they first formed their motto was 'deeds not words'. The W.S.P.U formed because the methods of the N.U.W.S.S weren't working. They had been campaigning since 1867 and not a lot had changed in terms of women getting the vote.

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    Women would find it hard during this time for their careers, as they tended to have children that interfered with their work. The women still also got paid less than of a man in the same position. Legal and political progress No matter what class they were women were not

  2. womens crsk history

    Inadvertently, however, it is showing that women are very important; if a woman is not there to do her job, then everything in the house goes wrong. This shows that a woman is very important in everyday life. In conclusion, I think that Sources A and C do not agree

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work