• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kashmala Khan History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst 1.) What was distinctive about the methods used by the WPSU in the campaign for women's suffrage? The text calls this terrorism. Does this seem fair? A: The methods used by the WSPU for its campaign for women's suffrage were fairly extreme. They chained themselves to railings, wrote 'Votes for Women' in acid on golf courses, disrupted the postal service (by making arson attacks on post boxes) attacked MPs physically and verbally, wrote graffiti on church walls and government buildings, broke windows, and burnt down empty buildings. Emmeline Pankhurst motto was ' Deeds not Words'. She encouraged militant like approach to the government but it would be debatable to call these methods terrorism. In fact, the Suffragettes started off relatively peacefully. It was only in 1905 that the organisation created a stir when Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney interrupted a political meeting in Manchester to ask Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey if they believed in women should have the right to vote. ...read more.

Middle

Newcastle and Bradford also suffered heavily from these attacks. Other places attacked included Bath, Southampton, Richmond, Edinburgh, Kirkcaldy, Southport, Ilkeston, Hasting and Cardiff. In October 1912 Emmeline urged that ' those of you who can express your militancy by going to the House of Commons and refusing to leave do so. Those of you who can express militancy by facing party mobs at Cabinet ministers' meetings do so. Those of you who can break- windows break them. Those of you who can still further attack the secret idol of property do so'. Every time that Emmeline was imprisoned, it excited a strong response. Her conviction in April 1913 was followed, according to the WSPU, by the biggest revolutionary outbreak in Britain since the struggle for the 1832 Reform Bill. It seems that the campaign was co-ordinated quite successfully with sympathy attracted to the WSPU (Cat and Mouse Act). Even though she did not write a template for WSPU activity, Emmeline Pankhurst undoubtedly framed the policy by her high profile speeches and her incitement to violence 3.) ...read more.

Conclusion

In is vital to keep in mind that up until 1912 Emmeline Pankhurst continued to use constitutional means, speaking all over Britain to various groups, demonstrating, petitions, trying to persuade MPs to listen and support Conciliation Bills. It was when these methods failed that the WSPU resorted to violence. Emmeline always insisted that the militant campaign was targeted against property not human life. So in conclusion it is clear that Emmeline had tried hard to use the 'pen rather than the sword' however it was when that failed did the WSPU resort to undemocratic means. 5.) Why did Sylvia and Christabel part Company in 1914? A: Christabel helped her mother Emmeline out with the war effort, however Sylvia was deeply opposed to the war. She disagreed with the WSPU strong support of the war effort and joined with Charlotte Despond to form the Women's Peace Army and organisation, which demanded a negotiated peace. During the war she joined Dr. Barbara Tchaykovsky to open four mother- and-baby clinics in London. Sylvia was a supporter of the Russian Revolution and in 1917 visited the country and met Lenin. She ended up arguing with him over the issue of censorship. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    Various historians believe that the violence of the suffragettes actually held back women's suffrage due to the negligent actions that were being taken by these women.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    his pro-German sympathies and his aid to the Central Powers made it impossible for the Allies to conduct successful operations in the Balkan region. In June, the Allies began an invasion of Greece, and at the same time exerted diplomatic pressure on Constantine to abdicate.

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    Elizabeth had three children who all died of meningitis. This did not halt her medical career and in 1872 she opened the New Hospital for Women in London, a hospital that had an entire staff of only women. With the creation of this hospital women could get a lot more medical jobs, which was good.

  2. The Struggle For The Emancipation Of Women

    as kind of managers in the factories to watch over the women. These problems were only faced at work there were other problems that women overcame in their personal lives as well. Firstly to even work a lot of middle and upper class women were forced to run away from home because their dads/husbands wouldn't let them work.

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    written by the Jarrow public health committee so therefore both sources are very similar and might even be written for the same reason.

  2. Gallipoli Questions

    I feel this because one of the main reasons the campaign failed was because of the extreme heat and the lack of knowledge of the terrain and surroundings. This source is illustrated in Source F, as you can see just how narrow the land is and also, how many forts and defensive structures there are.

  1. womens crsk history

    Source B is saying women would take over, as there are more women than men, 1.3 million women, and this would lead to a long term effect. The men would fear this, as they fear change. Both of the Sources agree that there would be negative changes.

  2. Modern history

    Sympathy decreased as militancy ascended, losing sympathetic figures as Winston Churchill and Lloyd George. Evidence of the nation's resentment was seen after such extremes when the 'Rokeby Venus' was slashed in the National Gallery. The populace retaliated by trapping the WSPU members in a lift and assaulting them with cake.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work