• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kashmala Khan History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst 1.) What was distinctive about the methods used by the WPSU in the campaign for women's suffrage? The text calls this terrorism. Does this seem fair? A: The methods used by the WSPU for its campaign for women's suffrage were fairly extreme. They chained themselves to railings, wrote 'Votes for Women' in acid on golf courses, disrupted the postal service (by making arson attacks on post boxes) attacked MPs physically and verbally, wrote graffiti on church walls and government buildings, broke windows, and burnt down empty buildings. Emmeline Pankhurst motto was ' Deeds not Words'. She encouraged militant like approach to the government but it would be debatable to call these methods terrorism. In fact, the Suffragettes started off relatively peacefully. It was only in 1905 that the organisation created a stir when Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney interrupted a political meeting in Manchester to ask Winston Churchill and Sir Edward Grey if they believed in women should have the right to vote. ...read more.

Middle

Newcastle and Bradford also suffered heavily from these attacks. Other places attacked included Bath, Southampton, Richmond, Edinburgh, Kirkcaldy, Southport, Ilkeston, Hasting and Cardiff. In October 1912 Emmeline urged that ' those of you who can express your militancy by going to the House of Commons and refusing to leave do so. Those of you who can express militancy by facing party mobs at Cabinet ministers' meetings do so. Those of you who can break- windows break them. Those of you who can still further attack the secret idol of property do so'. Every time that Emmeline was imprisoned, it excited a strong response. Her conviction in April 1913 was followed, according to the WSPU, by the biggest revolutionary outbreak in Britain since the struggle for the 1832 Reform Bill. It seems that the campaign was co-ordinated quite successfully with sympathy attracted to the WSPU (Cat and Mouse Act). Even though she did not write a template for WSPU activity, Emmeline Pankhurst undoubtedly framed the policy by her high profile speeches and her incitement to violence 3.) ...read more.

Conclusion

In is vital to keep in mind that up until 1912 Emmeline Pankhurst continued to use constitutional means, speaking all over Britain to various groups, demonstrating, petitions, trying to persuade MPs to listen and support Conciliation Bills. It was when these methods failed that the WSPU resorted to violence. Emmeline always insisted that the militant campaign was targeted against property not human life. So in conclusion it is clear that Emmeline had tried hard to use the 'pen rather than the sword' however it was when that failed did the WSPU resort to undemocratic means. 5.) Why did Sylvia and Christabel part Company in 1914? A: Christabel helped her mother Emmeline out with the war effort, however Sylvia was deeply opposed to the war. She disagreed with the WSPU strong support of the war effort and joined with Charlotte Despond to form the Women's Peace Army and organisation, which demanded a negotiated peace. During the war she joined Dr. Barbara Tchaykovsky to open four mother- and-baby clinics in London. Sylvia was a supporter of the Russian Revolution and in 1917 visited the country and met Lenin. She ended up arguing with him over the issue of censorship. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Sometimes his bombardments would last for weeks. The place when the bombardment was most successful was on the Hindenburg line, the bombardments simply blew it away and as you know the Hindenburg line breakthrough was the most important event in winning the war.

  2. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    and that women were going to gain the vote at some time or another. Before the war, these measures were getting to an extortionate level, where women were setting fire to buildings and so forth just to get noticed. Nevertheless, some historians believe that without the violent campaign the suffragettes

  1. The struggle for the emancipation of women.

    After meeting her Elizabeth decided she also wanted a career in medicine. Her parents weren't too keen on the idea but eventually her father agreed to support her in her bid to become Britain's first female doctor. She tried to get into many medical schools but all of them refused on the grounds that she was a woman.

  2. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    written by the Jarrow public health committee so therefore both sources are very similar and might even be written for the same reason.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    It was the younger women (overall) who did many of the dirty dangerous jobs and they were not getting the vote for this, therefore the theory about it being a reward is not giving the full picture.

  2. The Struggle For The Emancipation Of Women

    was that he threw herself under the king's horse at the Derby. There were plenty of reasons they did these things, militancy didn't work and the majority of the public had turned against them. There were more things going on in the background.

  1. Gallipoli Questions

    I feel this because one of the main reasons the campaign failed was because of the extreme heat and the lack of knowledge of the terrain and surroundings. This source is illustrated in Source F, as you can see just how narrow the land is and also, how many forts and defensive structures there are.

  2. Modern history

    that militancy gave legal justification for the anti arguments, therefore losing much support. Militancy turned away sympathetic, potential and influential supporters both political and local. However, gains like mass awareness were achieved alongside highlighting determination the ability to fight for a cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work