Samantha Featherstone GCSE History Mrs Scott
Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin’s successor
There are many reasons why Stalin emerged as Lenin’s successor instead of Trotsky and some are more significant than others. Personality wise, Stalin was politically cunning whilst Trotsky was arrogant and uninspiring.
At the time of Lenin’s death, Stalin was in a very powerful position as General Secretary of the Communist Party. He controlled party membership and appointments to key positions within the communist party. He was also head of Central Commission, which gave him power to expel from Communist Party those who supported Trotsky. Stalin was extremely politically cunning; he played off different groups in the Communist Party against each other. Lenin’s funeral is also an example of this. Trotsky was ill on the day of Lenin’s funeral, but Stalin told him to rest as the funeral wasn’t until later that week. This led people to believe that Trotsky couldn’t be bothered to turn up and Stalin made a big speech where he praised Lenin and told everyone he was Lenin’s disciple. This was not true. Stalin’s policy of “Socialism in One Country” was much more popular than Trotsky’s policies, “Permanent Revolution”. Stalin’s belief was that it was important to build up Russia’s agricultural and industrial strength. He believed it was vital for Russia to become an established power before convincing other countres to adopt Communism. The Russian people wanted to spend their money on their country, but Trotsky’s views for World Revolution would mean spending the money on making all other countries communist. Money would be wasted on financing the revolution instead of using it to provide food and shelter for the Russian residents.