• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Sourcework - Do Sources D and E make it more or less likely, that the account given in Source C is Accurate? - Hitler's Germany

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Sourcework Do Sources D and E make it more or less likely, that the account given in Source C is Accurate? Source C was written by David Buffman, the American consul based in Leipzig. As a first hand witness of the events of kristallnact, he can relate to the events more but as he undoubtedly wrote this piece after the 10th of November, he may have had hindsight which would affect his judgement of events and the consequential account that he wrote. The Source is undoubtedly opinionated in the way that it blatantly decrees that the Nazi Party organised and carried out via its agents, all the rioting and damage. The language goes further by using words such as 'horrific', 'ruins' and 'violence', which give a sense of the helplessness and terror that was experienced at he time. The piece is very anti-nazi. The motive behind the text was to provide an alternate version of events to that of the propaganda ruled German newspapers, this account would ultimately be passed to the American government. It may have also been a chance to write down the events how he saw them to 'get it off his chest'. As he watched the buildings burn and the Jews beaten while the police and fire service standing back watching, I imagine that he felt helpless in the middle of the chaos by writing this it may avail to do some god and banish his demons. ...read more.

Middle

the Jews by the Nazi party during the invasion of Austria as the Nazi's tried to force the Jews out of Germany. The authors motive behind the scribing of this document was to simply give a Jewish account of the events that were occurring in Nazi German countermanding the propaganda that was constructed by the nazi party about the anti Semitism that was present in rural Germany. The authenticity of his account could be doubted as it lacks preciseness only briefly describing each event. Bitterness and hatred for the Nazi Party could have influenced the context of the piece, this hatred being strengthened and increasing the chances of slight maliciousness if the description was written after kristallnact which the chances of are high has there were only 9 days in November before kristallnact. There are quite a few gaps in this piece mainly due to the lack of preciseness. The mention of the ''various signs of unrest'' what was the signs, how strong and definite were they? The worsening of the conditions in the countryside is not described either to what extent they were worsening or how spread out was the hostility in the countryside? This lack of detail all leads to doubts on the reliability of the description. Where was the author living is another question, he may have been living in a city away from the events he is describing and so may not have had an accurate point of view. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Police state that Germany was under at the time meant that every order that the police received had to have come from the Nazi Party. From other sources and my own knowledge this note seems to be completely true. The SA was given housebreaking tools. There could be no other feasible way that this man could have obtained the information other than from being a High Ranking Nazi Official in which case he would have had to have been a loyal follower of Hitler or as I believe he was a civil servant who was caught up in it all. The only gap in the note is whether the note is about the riots on the 8th when Von Roth died or the 9th during what is known commonly as Kristallnact. Apart from that the note is fairly concise. In conclusion I believe that overall sources D and E make the account in source C seem more likely. Source D questions whether it was just the SA on its own as it depicts the local German people as being extremely hostile towards Jews, but confirms C in the mention f the troubles and unrest that had been brewing up. Source E goes further by talking about the SA being involved and being provided with various implements to aid their mission. The only disagreement is that there is no mention of the SS being involved and no mention of the activities of the fire brigade. Overall though these two sources give a very strong case for Source C. J.Harratt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Holocaust Sources Questions

    It makes the SS look innocent and the "Death's Head Battalions" were to blame for everything. In Source K and L both men are lying for their own benefit. A strength in their Statement is that they were there at the time.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The title 'Armed Uprising' is linked in with these men who have the guns on the cover of the book. 'Armed' is obviously to do with weapons, such as the men on the cover are holding, and 'Uprising' is another term for 'rebellion/revolution', terms very commonly linked in with Communism.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    Source C also says the same thing. 'There could be no doubt that the Communists had made a final attempt to seize power by creating an atmosphere of panic and terror' is a quote which blatantly states the Communists starting it. However, Goebbels, the man who it was written by, was the Minister of Propaganda and was paid to lie, so may make this source unreliable.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    The Nazis presented the Jews in this way because they blamed them for Germany's 'loss/surrender' of WWI(signing of the Treaty of Versailles 1918 by 'November Criminals').The Nazis also showed the Jews in this way to manipulate Germans into the Nazi way of thinking.

  1. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    The Nazi party were also in the minority. Other problems with the accuracy of this source is that from 1938-1942 the members of the party would have changed and thus representing different opinions than before. Source A is more useful in understanding the treatment of Jews in Germany because it is written in 1939 unlike Source D which was written half a century later in 1989.

  2. Kristallnacht. Source C is an account by David Buffman, from the American Consul in ...

    This supports his original opinion that Kristallnacht was not a spontaneous attack, as the SS men and Stormtroopers had already 'been provided with hammers, axes and fire bombs', even before the events had started. This source also make the Nazi's look bad, because it wants people to see that Nazi's are immoral and corrupt.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Source B would not necessarily back up source A given that it is an official account of a major event. One of the subtle differences between accounts was how the sources themselves were acquired. Rudolf Diels' source was written in a journal, whereas that of Van Der Lubbe was given orally at a trial.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    The Nazis would want to publish a book like this because it is propaganda and it could change people's opinion on the communist party. Up until 27th of February in 1933, one of Hitler's tasks was to get rid of his oppositions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work