• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Sourcework - 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far do these sources support this claim.

Extracts from this document...


History Sourcework: Study all the Sources. 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far do these sources support this claim. When looking at this question, it becomes obvious that there are three different possibilities of how Kristallnact came about: 1.It was a spontaneous event by the German people in anger to the death of von Roth 2. It was ordered by Hitler, in order to eliminate the Jews. 3. It was planned by Goebbels in order to help him with his power struggle within the Nazi Party. The first option of kristallnacht being a spontaneous event by the German people is supported by sources B and D. Source D describes how the signs reading 'Jews not wanted' appeared put up by the German people, o ward off Jews from their tow. This mild hatred could have led them to riot during Kristallnact, but I believe that this account may have been slightly over exaggerated as the tone is very negative and highlights the negative factors while remaining too vague. ...read more.


He took interviews and gathered information until he concluded that the Nazi party had ordered the rioting and caused it to happen and furthermore that most German people had not participated in the rioting themselves. Source F is a cartoon drawn by a Russian artist for the Russian newspaper. The Russians bitterly hated the Germans and so if there was a rumour that the Nazis had committed the crimes on kristallnacht then hey would take it and demonstrate to there people how evil capitalism was as the government ordered its own people in Germany to be purged. Source G is another cartoon drawn some weeks after kristallnacht when appeasement had ended, The magazine began to think about the way in which the Nazis were treating its people and so drew this cartoon. This cartoon can be applied both to kristallnacht and other events that had happened. This cartoon is about the evils of Nazism not just Kristallnact. As 'outsiders' so to speak they will not fully comprehend how the Nazi party conflicts inside between senior officials. ...read more.


They would have suspected and heard who started kristallnacht and what happened really. This adds extra credit o these sources. Source I stands alone as it matches into none of the other three categories. It only shows Hitler's regret at what happened. It doesn't discuss what actually happened on kristallnacht or who started it. It therefore has no relevance to any other source. In conclusion I believe that those sources group into option 3 have he most relevance and support on a single theory. The theory of spontaneous action has two sources to support it, one of which is biased, the other which is vague and inaccurate in its relevance to kristallnacht. Non-Germans who do not fully understand the political climate of the time write all the sources that group into option 2. They believe that it was not a spontaneous event but believe that Hitler ordered it. People who lived in Germany write option 3, people who understood what were happening and what the Nazi party was up to. Options 2&3 have greater numbers than option 1 which means that the sources overall disagree with the theory of spontaneous attack. J.Harratt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    is wrong. When Goering has his little speech about how 'every Communist will be hanged or shot', this suggests that the Nazis did actually believe that this was a start of a war against Communists, an uprising, so agrees with i).

  2. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' - How far do these ...

    It was compiled from interviews and eye witnesses from when it was happening. It mentions how a majority of German people where not involved at all whilst SS men and stormtroopers dressed as civilians went out supplied with axes, hammers and fire bombs.

  1. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    Source D endorses this by mentioning that in the weeks preceding Kristallnacht, there had already been 'signs of unrest amongst the masses'; here, the use of language suggests that the ordinary Germans were the 'masses' who would eventually become out of hand, and spontaneously start the great riots against the Jews.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Source E states quite clearly that these acts of violence and house breaking were carried out by SS men who were supplied with the necessary equipment and local knowledge by the Police. So clearly the whole operation was planned and carried out by the State.

  1. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    Overall, I think that this doesn't support the statement because the source clearly implies that Goebbels and the SA were involved and it was planned, not a 'spontaneous event caused by the German people' Source B tells us that Goebbels had informed the party leaders at the dinner party that there had been "anti-Jewish demonstrations".

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Van Der Lubbe would be under a greater deal of pressure which may have affected the content of his statement, and therefore adding bias and unreliability to the comparison between each. In conclusion, there is inconclusive evidence to say whether source A is fully supported by source B.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    This claims that Goebbles destroyed the property so it was not the fault of the German public but his. The source is quite reliable because Goering would have had a good idea of what was going one inside the Nazi party because he was a chief Nazi.

  2. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    most German people had nothing to do with the carnage, "most German people have nothing to do with these riots and burnings" which goes with what David Buffman was saying that the German people wore horrified by the attacks. This source gives the impression that source C is more accurate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work