• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Sourcework - 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far do these sources support this claim.

Extracts from this document...


History Sourcework: Study all the Sources. 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far do these sources support this claim. When looking at this question, it becomes obvious that there are three different possibilities of how Kristallnact came about: 1.It was a spontaneous event by the German people in anger to the death of von Roth 2. It was ordered by Hitler, in order to eliminate the Jews. 3. It was planned by Goebbels in order to help him with his power struggle within the Nazi Party. The first option of kristallnacht being a spontaneous event by the German people is supported by sources B and D. Source D describes how the signs reading 'Jews not wanted' appeared put up by the German people, o ward off Jews from their tow. This mild hatred could have led them to riot during Kristallnact, but I believe that this account may have been slightly over exaggerated as the tone is very negative and highlights the negative factors while remaining too vague. ...read more.


He took interviews and gathered information until he concluded that the Nazi party had ordered the rioting and caused it to happen and furthermore that most German people had not participated in the rioting themselves. Source F is a cartoon drawn by a Russian artist for the Russian newspaper. The Russians bitterly hated the Germans and so if there was a rumour that the Nazis had committed the crimes on kristallnacht then hey would take it and demonstrate to there people how evil capitalism was as the government ordered its own people in Germany to be purged. Source G is another cartoon drawn some weeks after kristallnacht when appeasement had ended, The magazine began to think about the way in which the Nazis were treating its people and so drew this cartoon. This cartoon can be applied both to kristallnacht and other events that had happened. This cartoon is about the evils of Nazism not just Kristallnact. As 'outsiders' so to speak they will not fully comprehend how the Nazi party conflicts inside between senior officials. ...read more.


They would have suspected and heard who started kristallnacht and what happened really. This adds extra credit o these sources. Source I stands alone as it matches into none of the other three categories. It only shows Hitler's regret at what happened. It doesn't discuss what actually happened on kristallnacht or who started it. It therefore has no relevance to any other source. In conclusion I believe that those sources group into option 3 have he most relevance and support on a single theory. The theory of spontaneous action has two sources to support it, one of which is biased, the other which is vague and inaccurate in its relevance to kristallnacht. Non-Germans who do not fully understand the political climate of the time write all the sources that group into option 2. They believe that it was not a spontaneous event but believe that Hitler ordered it. People who lived in Germany write option 3, people who understood what were happening and what the Nazi party was up to. Options 2&3 have greater numbers than option 1 which means that the sources overall disagree with the theory of spontaneous attack. J.Harratt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Study the following interpretations of the Reichstag Fire: i) Van der Lubbe was a madman, and he set fire to the Reichstag all by himself, but genuinely believed the fire was part of a Communist uprising. ii) The Reichstag Fire was started by the Nazis to give them an

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Van Der Lubbe would be under a greater deal of pressure which may have affected the content of his statement, and therefore adding bias and unreliability to the comparison between each. In conclusion, there is inconclusive evidence to say whether source A is fully supported by source B.

  1. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    If this is the case then it is possible that other Germans were also unaware of the Jews fate which makes it fair to say that they too were not 'willing executioners.' Source 10 is from a woman's diary. The writer is said to have worked to save Jews.

  2. Kristallnacht was a spontaneous even by the German people. How far do these ...

    friend of Hitler and she may have been trying to protect him on the other hand, as the account was taken a long time after the actually event happened, Frau Troost would have grown elderly and might have forgotten some of the details and mixed up the truth from lies.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    It says that "most German people have [had] nothing to do with these attacks." Two sources claim that the Nazi party were responsible for these attacks and both sources are generally reliable - Source E's reliability is explained later. Source D does not say for definite who caused the attacks

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    However, Source H insists that Goebbels was responsible for the mass destruction, whereas in Source I, Hitler does not confirm this. This leads us to see that publicly, Hitler did not want the Nazis to be seen as guilty for Kristallnacht, whereas in fact, 'there was no doubting Hitler's approval' (Source A).

  1. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    I think that this implies that ordinary German people performed kristallnacht. It also says that it wasn't organised by the Nazi party but that they wouldn't discourage the demonstrations. Source B seems reliable- it was from a secret report prepared by the Nazi Supreme Court.

  2. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' - How far do these ...

    Source B is a secret report prepared by the Nazi Supreme court which gives it strong credibility. It states how Hitler was told by Goebbels to neither promote these demonstrations nor discourage them if they started spontaneously. Source D is by a German-Jew describing the weeks before Kristallnacht.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work