• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Sourcework - 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far do these sources support this claim.

Extracts from this document...


History Sourcework: Study all the Sources. 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far do these sources support this claim. When looking at this question, it becomes obvious that there are three different possibilities of how Kristallnact came about: 1.It was a spontaneous event by the German people in anger to the death of von Roth 2. It was ordered by Hitler, in order to eliminate the Jews. 3. It was planned by Goebbels in order to help him with his power struggle within the Nazi Party. The first option of kristallnacht being a spontaneous event by the German people is supported by sources B and D. Source D describes how the signs reading 'Jews not wanted' appeared put up by the German people, o ward off Jews from their tow. This mild hatred could have led them to riot during Kristallnact, but I believe that this account may have been slightly over exaggerated as the tone is very negative and highlights the negative factors while remaining too vague. ...read more.


He took interviews and gathered information until he concluded that the Nazi party had ordered the rioting and caused it to happen and furthermore that most German people had not participated in the rioting themselves. Source F is a cartoon drawn by a Russian artist for the Russian newspaper. The Russians bitterly hated the Germans and so if there was a rumour that the Nazis had committed the crimes on kristallnacht then hey would take it and demonstrate to there people how evil capitalism was as the government ordered its own people in Germany to be purged. Source G is another cartoon drawn some weeks after kristallnacht when appeasement had ended, The magazine began to think about the way in which the Nazis were treating its people and so drew this cartoon. This cartoon can be applied both to kristallnacht and other events that had happened. This cartoon is about the evils of Nazism not just Kristallnact. As 'outsiders' so to speak they will not fully comprehend how the Nazi party conflicts inside between senior officials. ...read more.


They would have suspected and heard who started kristallnacht and what happened really. This adds extra credit o these sources. Source I stands alone as it matches into none of the other three categories. It only shows Hitler's regret at what happened. It doesn't discuss what actually happened on kristallnacht or who started it. It therefore has no relevance to any other source. In conclusion I believe that those sources group into option 3 have he most relevance and support on a single theory. The theory of spontaneous action has two sources to support it, one of which is biased, the other which is vague and inaccurate in its relevance to kristallnacht. Non-Germans who do not fully understand the political climate of the time write all the sources that group into option 2. They believe that it was not a spontaneous event but believe that Hitler ordered it. People who lived in Germany write option 3, people who understood what were happening and what the Nazi party was up to. Options 2&3 have greater numbers than option 1 which means that the sources overall disagree with the theory of spontaneous attack. J.Harratt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Source A suggests that statement i)

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    Source D endorses this by mentioning that in the weeks preceding Kristallnacht, there had already been 'signs of unrest amongst the masses'; here, the use of language suggests that the ordinary Germans were the 'masses' who would eventually become out of hand, and spontaneously start the great riots against the Jews.

  1. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' - How far do these ...

    It was compiled from interviews and eye witnesses from when it was happening. It mentions how a majority of German people where not involved at all whilst SS men and stormtroopers dressed as civilians went out supplied with axes, hammers and fire bombs.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Source E states quite clearly that these acts of violence and house breaking were carried out by SS men who were supplied with the necessary equipment and local knowledge by the Police. So clearly the whole operation was planned and carried out by the State.

  1. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    the reaction of the writer's mother at the sight of the dead bodies. The writer's mother is said to have taken a nervous breakdown after, "her whole world collapsed." Therefore it is viable to say that the writer's mother was unaware of what happened to the Jews, and so she was not a 'willing executioner.'

  2. Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    It gives the true Nazi point of view, as it is secret and not meant to be read; there is no need to lie. Overall, this source agrees with the statement as it implies that it was a 'spontaneous event by the German people', "such demonstrations were not organised by the party."

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Van Der Lubbe spoke about the events just after they happened, therefore in this case, source B does not support source A. Another point to make about the sources is why they were created. Source A was from Rudolf Diels' personal account, whereas source B was given to a jury during trial.

  2. Free essay

    Did Hitler have the support of most of the German people?

    However, they strongly feared being given to another country, so even though they were Catholic, they voted for the Nazi party, as they believed the Nazis would save these borders. In general, the Catholics opposed the Nazis. They were an international group, so it was much more difficult for Hitler to infiltrate them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work