• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Hitler's aims and actions were the only cause of World War Two." Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Hitler's aims and actions were the only cause of World War Two." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? When considering the reasons for the outbreak of war in 1939 it is easy to place the entire blame on Hitler's aggressive foreign policy in the late 1930s. One British historian, writing a few years after the end of the war, claimed that 'the Second World War was Hitler's personal war, in that he intended it, he prepared for it, he chose the moment for launching it.' In this assignment it is my intention to show that Hitler's foreign policy was a major factor in causing the conflict but that other reasons, both long term and short term, need to be recognised as well. Probably the first factor that need considering is the Treaty of Versailles, of 1919. The harshness of the Treaty and the way in which it blamed Germany for World War I crippled Germany. Much of its territory was taken away from it, including West Prussia that went to form a new Polish Corridor to the sea. ...read more.

Middle

Both countries felt they had too many problems at home to deal with countries on the other side of the world so resorted to policies of appeasement such as the Hoare-Laval pact, which gave Italy most of Abyssinia. The League had no army of its own so could not take any military action, but Britain at this time feared a public uprising if they went to war and feared for the safety of its own colonies whilst France poured all its resources in to build the Maginot Line and defending itself from future German aggression. The USA's absence from the League only furthered the image that it was weak because it did no have the World's greatest power backing it. This isolationist policy and the lack of British and French involvement in Europe only furthered the idea that Hitler could get away with what ever he wanted. With all this in mind Hitler began his new foreign policy by marching troops back into the demilitarised Rhineland, in defiance of the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were several reasons why he made this decision. Firstly he was a communist and felt that both France and Britain disliked him. Another reason was because he was not invited to the Munich Conference. This created a great deal of mistrust and anger between the USSR and the Allied powers. The final reason was because the USSR had no alternative, they were not ready for war and only joined Hitler to get time to rearm, knowing full well that Germany would turn on them eventually. So it is my conclusion that World War broke out in 1939, not just because of the actions of Hitler, but because of a whole host of other reasons; resentment of the Treaty of Versailles, the weakness of the League of Nations, fear of Communism, isolationist policies of the West, the Depression, and of course one of the major factors, the policy of appeasement. My personal view is that if Britain, France and the USA had taken a more active role in World disputes, the atrocities of World War II could all have been avoided. Adam Baxter 10F ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. What Were the Reasons For the Outbreak of the Second World War?

    The Czechs knew that they couldn't surrender the Sudetenland as all of their frontier defences against Germany were stationed there, and if they were to hand it over, Hitler would have access to the rest of Czechoslovakia whenever he wanted.

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    Hitler gained the chance to invade Poland with a war on one front, if Britain supported Poland. Russia was afraid of Germany and signed it to get more time to arrange their army. Germany felt strong enough, but they had to get through Poland.

  1. To what extent can it be argued that appeasement was the cause of the ...

    It perceived by the majority of Europe as a struggle between the aggressive and advancing doctrine of fascism and the weakening force of democracy. The Spanish civil war was initially the result of an army revolt, which broke out against the Spanish left-wing republican government.

  2. adolf hitler

    If anyone happened to stop him during this short walk (some fifty or sixty yards), he was forced either to sit down on one of the seats placed along the walls for the purpose, or to catch hold of the person he was speaking to...

  1. 'No one factor can adequately explain the cause of world war two' Discuss

    Germany rejected the treaty and were dissatisfied so when a leader who opted to help them destroy the treaty asked for their vote he got it. Hitler's rise to power revolved around destroying the treaty of Versailles. Hitler's aggressive demands of 'lebensraum' (living space)

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    In my opinion, this aspect of the speech would have worried the members of the league as it is implying how ruthless Italy can be/are. When that is put into perspective with the league's actions, things can become very concerning for the league.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    This is an obvious admission by a Nazi party official that is was Goebbles' (another party member's) fault. It also says that they were organised. It shows this by stating that Goebbles was responsible. It could not have just been him alone who caused so much destruction in a country

  2. Evacuation was a great success do you agree or disagree with this statement

    Ultimately this source suggest evacuation was not very organised, furthermore source B, a staged photograph is not reliable in portraying evacuation is well organised. The photograph will have been staged to disguise what evacuation was really like and therefore it can be said to be un-organised.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work