• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Hitler's aims and actions were the only cause of World War Two." Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Hitler's aims and actions were the only cause of World War Two." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? When considering the reasons for the outbreak of war in 1939 it is easy to place the entire blame on Hitler's aggressive foreign policy in the late 1930s. One British historian, writing a few years after the end of the war, claimed that 'the Second World War was Hitler's personal war, in that he intended it, he prepared for it, he chose the moment for launching it.' In this assignment it is my intention to show that Hitler's foreign policy was a major factor in causing the conflict but that other reasons, both long term and short term, need to be recognised as well. Probably the first factor that need considering is the Treaty of Versailles, of 1919. The harshness of the Treaty and the way in which it blamed Germany for World War I crippled Germany. Much of its territory was taken away from it, including West Prussia that went to form a new Polish Corridor to the sea. ...read more.

Middle

Both countries felt they had too many problems at home to deal with countries on the other side of the world so resorted to policies of appeasement such as the Hoare-Laval pact, which gave Italy most of Abyssinia. The League had no army of its own so could not take any military action, but Britain at this time feared a public uprising if they went to war and feared for the safety of its own colonies whilst France poured all its resources in to build the Maginot Line and defending itself from future German aggression. The USA's absence from the League only furthered the image that it was weak because it did no have the World's greatest power backing it. This isolationist policy and the lack of British and French involvement in Europe only furthered the idea that Hitler could get away with what ever he wanted. With all this in mind Hitler began his new foreign policy by marching troops back into the demilitarised Rhineland, in defiance of the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were several reasons why he made this decision. Firstly he was a communist and felt that both France and Britain disliked him. Another reason was because he was not invited to the Munich Conference. This created a great deal of mistrust and anger between the USSR and the Allied powers. The final reason was because the USSR had no alternative, they were not ready for war and only joined Hitler to get time to rearm, knowing full well that Germany would turn on them eventually. So it is my conclusion that World War broke out in 1939, not just because of the actions of Hitler, but because of a whole host of other reasons; resentment of the Treaty of Versailles, the weakness of the League of Nations, fear of Communism, isolationist policies of the West, the Depression, and of course one of the major factors, the policy of appeasement. My personal view is that if Britain, France and the USA had taken a more active role in World disputes, the atrocities of World War II could all have been avoided. Adam Baxter 10F ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. To what extent can it be argued that appeasement was the cause of the ...

    Francisco Franco assumed the leader of the revolt. Leon Blum was sympathetic towards the republican government, but was fearful of a right wing backlash. Blum therefore suggested a policy of non-intervention by all European powers be promoted. Consequently the British government were enthusiastic of this policy.

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    On the other hand, the speech (Source E) was said by a British person and was said just after the time of the incident. Therefore, if Samuel Hoare hated the LoN years later, nothing would be different in terms of the speech as it has already been made. As mentioned earlier, time plays a huge part in reliability.

  1. What Were the Reasons For the Outbreak of the Second World War?

    It did have one weakness though. Of the large number of ethnic minorities that made up Czechoslovakia's population, there were 3.5 million ethnic Germans living in the area along the Czech-German border known as the Sudetenland. Hitler's plan was to utilise the Sudeten Germans to kick up trouble.

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    The Nazi party in Austria created a time of riots, by burning buildings and starting street fights creating problems for the Austrian government.

  1. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    However, when Italy did invade Abyssinia Chamberlain imposed sanctions on Italy to try and stop them. This failed. With Czechoslovakia, Chamberlain tried to get Germany and the Czech's come up with some kind of agreement over the Sudetenland. Chamberlain was ignorant of German intentions and claimed when Germany did invade

  2. adolf hitler

    The most dramatic of these attempts was the July Plot. On July 20, 1944, Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, who was attending one of Hitler's military conferences, placed a bomb in a briefcase under the table. When the bomb exploded it killed four people and seriously injured ten others, but Hitler only suffered minor cuts and burns.

  1. The Fall of France in World War II.

    gun emplacements, deep ditches, barbed-wire entanglements, areas of buried explosive mines," and many other obstacles designed to keep off any enemy attacks (McGowen 12). The line stretched from Luxembourg to Switzerland, and was considered a masterpiece of the highest technological advancement at the time (Evenson 232).

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Source I like Source B, was written by top Nazi officials and is also very unclear. It does not state specifically who did it. This makes it seem like the Nazi party was trying to cover up something - maybe they did plan it after all.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work