• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Hitler's Foreign Policy and the Outbreak of the Second World War, 1933-39"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Samantha Donoghue 12C Edexcel AS Level History. Unit 3C: Centre Designed Coursework "Hitler's Foreign Policy and the Outbreak of the Second World War, 1933-39" Part B: Assessment Objective 1 "The outbreak of war can be more attributed to blunder than design." Until this statement from AJP Taylor it was the common belief amongst historians that the outbreak of the Second World War was solely attributed to Hitler's planning and design. Taylor's conclusions started a new wave of controversy as to the origins of the Second World War. Subsequently, historians began to divide into two schools of thought: Intentionalists and Functionalists. Intentionalists include the historians Klaus Hildebrand and Eberhard J�ckel. Functionalists include the historians Hans Mommsen and Martin Brozat. For the Intentionalists Hitler remains central to the origins of war. For the Functionalists the belief is that foreign policy was created by the social and economic conditions of the Third Reich, and Nazi foreign policy did not show a design to wage war but was reactive to the developing European climate. The first of many blunders set the stage for future German hostility towards the Allies. The Treaty of Versailles was a blunder on the part of Britain and France in that the terms of the treaty were too harsh. It crippled Germany and led to bitterness and resentment amongst the German people. Hitler used the it to shape his foreign policy. It is important that Nazi foreign policy is seen in this historical context for example, as a result of the treaty, Nazi Germany stopped paying reparations, abandoned disarmament and remilitarised the Rhineland. ...read more.

Middle

France seemed prepared to offer Italy a free hand in the takeover of Abysinnia whilst Britain was not. This divided the allies and gave Italy confused messages as to what the reaction of the allies would be. Italy took the information it had received as a green light and in October 1935, Mussolini invaded Abysinnia. As a reaction to this, Britain and France imposed half-hearted sanctions on Italy. The sanctions were sufficient to cause some difficulty to the Italian economy and considerable irritation to Mussolini. Hitler used this as an opportunity to re-militarise the Rhineland and Italy became increasingly closer to Germany, signing the Rome-Berlin axis in 1936. This incident severely damaged the credibility of the League of Nations as it was unable to help Abyssinia due to it having no army. It marked the end of the league as an effective organisation. Another blunder on the part of Britain and France was their relations with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union had been excluded from the Munich agreement as France and Britain were not willing to form alliances with a communist state due to their fear of the spread of communism throughout Europe. If war were to come with Germany, western military experts did not place much value on any help from the Soviet Red Army. Faced with the prospect of further Nazi expansion, the British and French opened cautious negotiations with the Soviets. The Western powers gave remarkably low priority to these negotiations. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was an economic plan to develop Germany's industries, in particular, armaments and the basic industries on which armament production depended. This plan would make Germany ready to wage war by 1940. The document also spoke of the need for Germany to become self-sufficient showing that Hitler also wanted the German economy to be fit for war. By increasing the pace of re-armament, Hitler had started an arms race and it became apparent that, due to Germany's comparative lack of resources, it was a race that he was not going to win if it went on for any length of time. History contains evidence for both planning and blunders. Both 'Mein Kampf' and the Hossbach Memorandum show Hitler's intentions to use force if necessary. Taking into consideration the controversy surrounding these sources, I would say that they still portray an accurate picture of Hitler's state of mind, and that it was always Hitler's intention to wage war however inaccurate the detail in these sources. A series of blunders and misjudgements on the parts of both the allies and Germany ultimately led to war but these would not have occurred if Germany had not been pushing for a war. However, this series of blunders did push Hitler into the kind of war he did not want, for example: the four year plan stated that Germany would be ready for war in 1940 although war broke out in 1939; Mein Kampf stated that Hitler wanted Britain as an ally but Hitler, in reality ended up at war with Britain. In conclusion, I would say that a series of blunders led to a different war than Hitler had planned for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Hitler's Foreign Policy

    This threatened Stalin a lot. So this pact would bring for at least some time, peace and safety into his country. A major stroke was what this pact represented for Hitler. He promised that Finland, Poland, Estonia and Latvia were the territories the Russians (Stalin)

  2. Was german foreign policy responsible for the outbreak of wwII?

    German Foreign Policy is not the only factor responsible for the outbreak for War , you can see with hindsight that the appeasement policy facilitated Hitler's success to a large degree. The appeasement policy allowed Germany to grow incredibly strong, not only did it just recover from lost ground it

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    Finally, something to note here is what the provenance states. Source A is a cartoon from a British magazine but is critical of the fact that Britain just looked on over the conflict between Italy and Abyssinia. On the other hand, source B is a cartoon from a British magazine

  2. How did stalemate develop on Western Fornt

    This resulted in stalemate. The start of the war for France also went really badly. Their war strategy was called Plan 17 which was basically French plan to attack Germany through Alsace- Lorraine. It went totally wrong for French. .

  1. Were the Great Powers ready for war in 1914?

    Agriculturally, Germany was excellent. By 1914 German agriculture, in terms of yield per hectare, was the most productive in the world.5 In 1912, Germany was producing 2,260 kg/hectare of wheat and 15,030 kg/hectare of potatoes. Their agricultural superiority shows that Germany would have the capability to survive for a period

  2. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another" again". Hitler had got what he wanted and it was on the 1st of October that he demanded that the Sudetenland should be evacuated.

  1. adolf hitler

    However, the party was well organized and membership had grown from 27,000 in 1925 to 108,000 in 1928. One of the new members was Joseph Goebbels. Hitler first met him in 1925. Both men were impressed with each other. Goebbels described one of their first meetings in his diary: "Shakes my hand.

  2. Why Did Britain And France Pursue A Policy Of Appeasement Between 1933 And 1939 ...

    America was just trying to work itself out of the depression and used isolation to stop draining on its resources and economy. The economic costs of any future war in training, equipment and munitions, was feared. It was debatable whether or not Britain and France were in a good enough economic shape to support another war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work