• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hitler's Foreign Policy - Appesement and the Nazi-Soviet Pact.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐History Test ? Hitler?s Foreign Policy 1. Hitler had many aims in foreign policy: he wanted to destroy the Treaty of Versailles, to stop the reparation payments, to earn Lebensraum in East by invading Eastern Europe and the USSR, to achieve Pan-Germanic Nationalism, to rearm and to defeat communism. 1. Britain followed the policy of appeasement for many reasons. The first was that Britain did not want to repeat the horrors of World War One. They vividly remembered the horrific experiences of it and wanted to avoid another war at almost any cost and so, by appeasing Hitler, they could prevent another war. Another reason was that Hitler was standing up to Communism. ...read more.

Middle

This is because the remilitarisation was just part of Hitler?s defiance against the Treaty of Versailles and ultimately, through appeasement, Britain was going to let Hitler do what he wanted. However the Nazi Soviet Pact can be directly linked with Hitler?s invasion of Poland which was the tipping point which started World War Two. The demilitarisation of the Rhineland was one of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. By trying to remilitarise the Rhineland, Hitler was taking a huge gamble. His German army was still relatively weak and small and therefore had been ordered that if there was any resistance, they should withdraw. This would have caused humiliation and Hitler would have lost the support of the Germany army as most of the generals were unsure about him. ...read more.

Conclusion

This treaty cleared the way for Germany?s invasion of Poland. On 1st September 1939 the German army invaded Poland from the west. Soviet forces invaded Poland from the east and it soon fell. I think that the Nazi Soviet Pact was a more important cause for the start of WW2 as it facilitated the invasion of Poland which Britain had vowed to go to war to protect, and in fact did. By invading Poland, Hitler stopped Britain appeasing (which might have continued) and started the war. Hitler was breaking many terms of the Treaty of Versailles and so his remilitarisation of the Rhineland was no different to building up his army or his navy which Britain had allowed Germany to do, and so did not directly cause the war to start. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Germany however had not been invited and was not told about the conference. Germany had not been invited to the conference because England and France wanted to blame someone for the war, i.e. Germany. So if Germany was not there they could not defend themselves against the British and the

  2. Was Hitler the cause of WW2? A.J.P Taylor wrote the controversial The origins ...

    In October, 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia using the modern weapon of tanks, planes and poisonous gas. Abyssinia appealed to the league as it was clear that it was an attack by the strong against weak. The league set up trading sanctions against Italy.

  1. "Castlereagh's foreign policy 1815-1822 was more successful than Canning's foreign policy 1822-1827" - Explain ...

    with which Britain had developed valuable trade and help the Greeks, while at the same time making sure that the Russians didn't gain too much advantage of the situation. Canning feared that the French and Spanish might invade Portugal and may even be tempted to regain lost colonies.

  2. Was the Policy of Appeasement correct?

    The policy of appeasement was a very foolish decision. Moreover, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was another indicator for Britain that Germany is ready for a war. The pact was between the Soviet Union and the Nazis and it was a non-aggression pact laying out each other's sphere of influence.

  1. German Foreign Policy - To what extent was the German Foreign Policy responsible ...

    The other main colonial rivalry was with France in Africa, where France opposed Britain's occupation of Egypt since 1882. Both countries were involved in the partition of Africa and French naval power was a rival to the British navy in both the Atlantic and the Mediterranean.

  2. Describe The Nazi-Soviet pact. Explain why relations between Britain and Germany changed in ...

    This was an encouraging prospect as Germany's army was not large enough to take on Britain and France at this point in time. Consequently Hitler signed a pact with the USSR to ensure the security of their country.

  1. AMR essay

    These were the Soviet Union, France, Great Britain, the United States, and China. When China split the People's Republic felt that they should replace the Republic of China on the Security Council as they now represented China. This did not go over well with the United States, who did not

  2. "The most important aim of the foreign policy 1933-36 was to overthrow the treaty ...

    This meant the Allies could impose reparations, reduce Germany's armed forces and take resourceful territory, calling it a punishment because they could not afford to go back to war. Germany's coalition government did consider restarting the war instead of accepting the terms but Germany was too weak.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work