• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Hitler's single aim in foreign policy was expand in the east." How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Hitler's single aim in foreign policy was expand in the east." How far do you agree with this view? Once his regime was consolidated, Hitler took little interest in domestic policy, his sole concern being that Germany becomes sufficiently strong to realize his long-term geopolitical goal of creating a German empire that would dominate Western Europe and extend deep into Russia. His racially motivated ideology and the need to create a greater Germany became his most hierarchical aims to fulfil. However, Hitler's policies were much more than a policy of expansionism but entailed the need to eradicate the Versailles Treaty and the unification of all German people into the Reich. I will argue towards the fact that these aims were as important as expansion into the east. Additionally I will stress that Hitler did not necessarily follow an intentionalist school of thought rather he was an opportunist able to make use of opportunities at hand whilst keeping a consistent aim in ideology. I will conclude that the aims that Hitler set about achieving were merely a step towards world domination through greater Germany. Hitler's idea of expansionism into the east (lebensraum) was in place long before he had come to power. ...read more.

Middle

It is also doubtful whether Hitler had intended to carry out his expansion into the east as he signed the non-aggression pact with Russia in 1939. The variation of policy shown by Hitler leads us to believe that he did not set out to conform to his previous ideas. Evidence concerning Hitler's foreign policy can be channelled into two views, one is the intentionalist view where his singular aim was expansion into the east and the other is the structuralist view whereby Hitler would be viewed as an opportunist. A J P Taylor presents an argument that Hitler "did not make plans for world conquest or anything else. He assumed that others would provide opportunities and that he would seize them." I strongly believe that Hitler grasped at opportunities that arose and followed a revisionist policy aimed at overcoming the restrictions imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles and seizing the diplomatic initiative from Britain and France. The continentalist and globalist views declare that Hitler was driven towards a single aim, however, I strongly believe that Hitler was an opportunist clutching at any favourable opportunity to make a greater German in every possible capacity. Hitler had deployed numerous policies in order to establish Grossdeutschland (Greater Germany), which included the annexation of Austria (Anschluss) ...read more.

Conclusion

Germany's military position was weak in comparison to its European neighbours, and with growing tension, Germany introduced the four year plan for rearmament setting out targets to increase its military capabilities. Military rearmament was prioritised over other industrial production to ensure Germany's ability to protect itself from its neighbours and be able to wager a war of its own. The army had increased from 100,000 to 500,000 men and the German air force had 2000 planes. Although rearmament was not likely to bring about economic stability, Hitler was sure that the land gained from wars won would bring about unparalleled economy supremacy. In conclusion, I believe that Hitler did not have a single aim but instead a multitude of aims. I also believe that Hitler never had a blueprint of his aims. The aims were inter connected, and the absence of one meant the absence of all. Lebensraum, Grossdeutschland, abolition of the Treaty of Versailles and rearmament can not coexist without each other. I firmly believe that Hitler was both an opportunist who had set out to try and achieve his ideological beliefs under any circumstances. This view is supported by Eberhard J�ckel who had asserted "Perhaps never in history did a ruler write down before he came to power what he was to do afterwards as precisely as did Adolf Hitler." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    In addition, they are in each other's face and in positions that are most likely when in a fight. This cannot be done with sacks and so source A is more understanding in showing the problems in this aspect. Likewise, in source A, the LoN is represented as a woman

  2. adolf hitler

    One of the consequences of this was rapid inflation. As people found their savings becoming worthless, they turned against their government. On 13th August, Gustav Stresemann became the new Chancellor of Germany. When Stresemann decided to call off resistance to the French occupation of the Ruhr and to start paying

  1. “Hitler’s single aim in foreign policy was to expand in the East” - How ...

    The nazi regime sought to establish in Eastern Europe and Russia, an empire based on race, in which those of Aryan descent would rule over the lesser Slav subject races. To support the view that expansion in the east was not Hitler's sole foreign policy aim, the Structuralist view of

  2. 'German Foreign Policy was mainly motivated by the need to regain territory lost by ...

    We demand land and territory to feed our people." This straight away gives support that one of the Nazi's main aims was to gain more 'living space' for German people. This aspiration was further reinforced seventeen years later at the 'Hossbach Memorandum' where Hitler stressed his goal of lebensraum 'must be made.'

  1. How was Nazi foreign policy for the start of WW2.

    According to the agreement, Rome and Berlin were the strongest cities in Europe, and therefore acted as an axis for all other powers to revolve around. This treaty was a loose agreement, which held the two countries together until the Pact of Steel was signed in1939.

  2. Hitler's Foreign Policy

    Consequently delaying their actions letting time pass by whilst the Japanese expanding their occupation of Chinese territory. The League showed no follow up on making the Japanese leave which overall increased people's discredit in the League because everyone was looking forward to it and it didn't take any actions.

  1. Nazi Germany Revision 1918-45

    * How far was there improvement in Germany?s situation in the period 1924-29? The positive pattern was not always present. There were critics of Stresemann?s foreign policy who saw him as selling out to the Allies. The economy, although improved, was not completely restored ? unemployment still remained high.

  2. Germany 1916-1945 revision notes.

    Farm areas were given to other countries giving Germany even less money. They would have to import more food. However lots of countries now hated Germany and because the treaty made Germany say they accepted total blame the hate rose.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work