• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Hitler's willing executioners?" How far is this an accurate reflection of the German attitudes towards the Jews and the Final Solution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Hitler's willing executioners?" How far is this an accurate reflection of the German attitudes towards the Jews and the Final Solution? There are those that claim that Hitler's conscious personal hatred of the Jews, his unique and central role in the rise of Nazi Germany were fundamental in the development of the anti-Jewish policies that emerged leading to the final solution. However, there is strong evidence to suggest that the anti- Jewish feeling in Germany reflected a much stronger, widespread support amongst its people and this essay will examine the role and attitudes of the German people towards the Final Solution. On the 1st of April, 1933, the boycott of Jewish businesses reflected evidence of widespread anti Jewish feelings amongst the lower bureaucracy of the SA. Prior to that there was very little evidence of a grand plan against the Jews, Hitler had only talked about legal discrimination and deprivation of human rights for the Jewish people. Yet Hitler claimed that he directly called for the shop boycott, which he felt would serve to strengthen anti-Semitic feelings although evidence suggests this might have failed. Many ordinary Germans were either apathetic or even sympathetic to the plights of the Jews and the international response predictably condemned this action. ...read more.

Middle

the expulsion of 17,000 polish Jews living in Germany led to the explosion of violence, during what became known as Kristallnacht, over the 9th and 10th of November, with the SA - SD - Gestapo smashing and burning synagogues and businesses resulting in the immediate arrest of 30,000 Jews, an action most believed was led by Goebbels. Evidence from the David Buffum, the American Counsel in Leipzig reported that many German felts benumbed, repulsed and "an precedented fury" against the Nazis for the events they had witnessed on the 10th of November. Those that voiced any concerns faced arrest and immediate imprisonment in the many concentration camps. A young 17 year old boy, Hermann Bremser, recorded in his diary that "History will remember this day as one of barbaric behaviour by the German population." Whilst many thought Kristallnacht to be another propaganda failure, the Nazi anti Jewish polices had steadily hardened and whilst there is plenty of evidence of the revulsion felt by the German people, it might be fair to assume that they were also becoming increasingly conditioned to the violence, perhaps fearing for themselves to the extent that little was done to prevent the slide towards the 'Final Solution.' ...read more.

Conclusion

He examined not only what they did but more importantly what they didn't do. Others like Kimel, a holocaust survivor differs in this view but acknowledges that anti-Semitism played a key role. But Kimel blames the simultaneous development t of Hitler, the Nazi state, the impact and effect of WW2 and the SS as other key factors. The Nazi racial policy would not have developed in the way it did without the intervention and support of Adolf Hitler. I believe it to be impossible to generalise the attitudes of Germans towards anti-Semitism. But there is strong evidence to show that the early stages of anti Jewish policy were forced by the lower party elements of the SA and then by the SD, Gestapo and SS. Many German people would have been horrified by the anti-Semitic violence and the racial policies leading towards the Final Solution. Many would have feared for their lives and there is evidence to show that many did indeed suffer for voicing their concerns. But there is also evidence of a strong anti Jewish sentiment in Germany, a feeling that was sufficiently strong enough to be exploited by the SA thugs and those that later followed, that allowed the policies of racial exclusion to develop to the point of genocide. Perhaps the German people were conditioned to accept the point of anti-Semitism? Either way, the blame cannot be borne by Hitler alone. Tom Sanderson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    It states, "The suggestions favoured Italy, were acceptable to France, and Eden gave the impression that England might accept them as well." The fact that the suggestions favoured Italy meant that they didn't favour Abyssinia. Baring this in mind, the source later says "Eden gave the impression that England might accept them as well."

  2. Reasons for the development of the final solution

    However, other solutions were attempted before the development o9f the Final Solution. In Poland the problem of so many Jews was met by the establishment of ghettoes. The ghettos were situated in the poor slum part of the city (about 2% of the city)

  1. Why was the decision to carry out the final solution made in 1941?

    This is perhaps the most significant factor in the decision to carry out the 'final solution' in 1941. During the 1939-1941 period, the Nazi's had still not worked out a clear, consistent policy with regard to the Jews, Poles or even the half-million ethnic Germans they had 'repatriated' to German annexed territory.

  2. How much did the German People know about the final solution?

    Source's 8 and 9 talk about taking the people from the local towns to the concentration camps and their reaction after. I think that both of the sources are very reliable, as they almost talk about the same innocent when cross-referenced.

  1. How far were the German people responsible for the Holocaust?

    The newly elected Iranian Prime minister has denied the Holocaust and openly vowed to destroy Israel. These are examples of how evidence can be misinterpreted to give a totally different account of an event. Barnes talks about the Allies having more brutal methods to their victims, this gives way to

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    The opening line to this source reads 'quoted in.' This implies that B Engelmann has quoted someone in his book but they are unknown. It does not read not 'quoted from,' as was written in almost every other source, which gives the impression that the source comes from B Engelmann's own personal experience.

  1. Wartime policies towards the Jews 1939-1945.

    THE HOUSE WHERE THE "FINAL SOLUTION" WAS PLANNED THE CONFERENCE ROOM WHERE THE MEETING TOOK PLACE. NOW A MUSEUM The fate of the Jews in Europe Austria and Czechoslovakia conformed to German policy almost as soon as they were invaded and initiated anti-Jewish legislation and controls over Jewish activates and life.

  2. "What was the purpose of the Final Solution?"

    number had dwindled to 118,000 in 1938 and another 30,000 left Germany when war was declared. On the 1st April 1933, the first of 400 Nazi racial laws was introduced. Jews were described as being "non-Aryans" and therefore excluded from the media, farming and public sector jobs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work