• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How accurate is it to state that the policy of ‘Appeasement’ caused the collapse of International order in 1939?

Extracts from this document...


How Accurate is it to State that the Policy of 'Appeasement' Caused the Collapse of International Order in 1939? Appeasement was a policy adopted by Britain and France in the 1930s to try and satisfy Hitler's demands. One could argue that appeasement could not have caused World War II because the Treaty of Versailles signed in 1919 was a contribution among other things. It contained article 231,the War Guilt Clause, which made Germany accept responsibility for World War I. Germans felt extremely angry and resentful about this, and wanted revenge. It effectively isolated Germany from the rest of the world as they wanted nothing to do with Germany. The treaty meant that Germany found it hard to build up its economy again as a result of colonies and land taken away, reparations of �6.6 billion and severe military reductions. ...read more.


Germany was already struggling out of hyperinflation as a result of the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923, and it was now in even deeper trouble. The Dawes Plan of 1924 meant that if America fell into financial difficulty, it would have to call back its loans from Germany. After the Wall Street Crash in 1929 every country started to use protectionism to protect their own economy. This meant less co-operation between countries. Depression also caused Hitler to come to power. Fascism, a policy of dictatorship used by Mussolini, encouraged Hitler to carry out his plans for more "Lebensraum", as he was closely watching as Italy invaded Abyssinia and ignored the supposedly powerful League. Soon, the aggressors became close allies who sympathised with each other. ...read more.


Appeasement enabled Germany and Russia to build up relations; they signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact. Russia had previously offered a pact with Britain and France. Britain and France also lost two of their allies (Romania and Yugoslavia) to appeasement. When Hitler took the Sudetenland it led him to think that Britain and France wouldn't act to protect other countries. Hitler said: "I've seen the British at Munich- they are little worms." Daladier, the new French Prime Minister, was not keen on keeping the promise made in the Locarno Pact of protecting Poland and Czechoslovakia if they were attacked. I think that Appeasement was not solely to blame for the collapse of international order. The depression, failure of the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles were major contributers to the collapse. But I also think that if Hitler was stopped when he invaded the Rhineland he would have been much more cautious about going any further with invasions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Was Appeasement A Mistake?

    writings and his invasion of the Sudetenland that by then he intended to conquer the rest of Eastern Europe. Even though at the time of Hitler's expansionism there was a lot of evidence to back up the policy of appeasement, looking at the case from afterwards it is evident that

  2. To What Extent was British Appeasement to Germany in the Interwar Period Justified?

    D Analysis This topic whether or appeasing Germany was justified or not been re-examined countless times. This action was very significant in history for it could have thwarted WWII. As time progresses, increasingly more information is uncovered but this of course requires further critical analysis.

  1. Why had international Peace Collapsed by 1939?

    Britain tried to appease countries to be allies against Germany with them. For example this happened in the Abyssinian debate like I mentioned. *************************************************************************** In 1939 Hitler made an agreement with Stalin called the Nazi Soviet Pact. This involved Hitler and Stalin not attacking one another and to divide Poland between them.

  2. To what extent can it be argued that appeasement was the cause of the ...

    Czechoslovakia the victim had no opportunity of a say in the deliberations, which sealed her fate.... At the crucial moment Britain and France have shown clearly that they are unwilling to fight for Czechoslovakia but... They are willing to guarantee that she hands over her industry, property etc to Hitler as it stands...

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    It is easy with hindsight to overlook the smaller things appeasement achieved, such as the opportunity for Britain to re-militarise (due to de-militarization that had been occurring previously) due to the fact that appeasement did lead to war and therefore is considered by the majority as a failure.

  2. British Policy of Appeasement May 1937 - March 1939.

    It also contemplated additions to the army that did not take place. There was only a general statement that in the case of Russia intervening, ten divisions should be withdrawn from the Western front and sent to the East, without altering the proportion of the two wings.

  1. what were the roots of the british policy of appeasement?

    The French were clearly not prepared for military confrontation. However, Winston Churchill later wrote 4 "If the French had taken military action immediately, Britain would have been forced to lend France support." Many people say this was an opportunity missed because the German force was small and they could have been defeated.

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    Members of the league would not be as worried due to the fact that Italy was on their own at the time and would therefore mean less strength. Once again though, Mussolini was a fascist and would have probably gone to extreme lengths to get an ally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work