• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How and with what results to 1939 did Stalin succeed in asserting his personal authority over the USSR?

Extracts from this document...


How and with what results to 1939 did Stalin succeed in asserting his personal authority over the USSR? During the period between Lenin's death, 1924, and the end of the 'Great Purge', 1939, Stalin managed to assert personal authority over the USSR by gaining complete control of the Communist Party and using terror to eliminate opposition to his role as leader. After a successful joint effort with Kamenev and Zinoviev to remove Trotsky from the Communist Party, Stalin turned his attention towards eliminating Kamenev and Zinoviev themselves, as they were a threat to his influence over the party. Both had attacked Stalin's authority and criticised the idea of having one single leader in the party. Therefore in 1926 party meetings were held in Moscow and Leningrad and attended by critics of both Zinoviev and Kamenev. These meetings saw that loyal members of the party were put in control of the two cities and that Zinoviev and Kamenev were removed as Secretaries of local parties. Zinoviev and Kamenev however, in 1926, joined with Trotsky in the 'United Opposition' to attack the policies of the Communist Party. Rather than debasing the party as they had hoped, this action led to their complete removal from the Politburo in 1926 and 1927. ...read more.


It was perhaps then inevitable that this change in policy should be accompanied by a purge of party members. During 1928-1930, 11 per cent of members were removed from the party, and then from 1933-1935 another 20 percent were ejected. A further 9 percent of party members were expelled in 1936 by not being issued new membership cards. Whether this was a way of ridding the party of lazy members and drunks or whether Stalin was trying to rid himself of critics and potential rivals is debatable. However, the reasons given for expulsion such as being spies or linked to spies, being Zinovievites and being former White Guards or Kulaks, suggest that it was a fear of opposition within the party that incited these purges as opposed to a desire for more respectable party members. Whether this was due to Stalin's insecurity or not, this way of controlling party membership was certainly a key factor in the assertion of Stalin's authority in the USSR. On 1 December 1934, Politburo member and Leningrad party leader Kirov was assassinated. A young party member, Nikolaev, was accused and shot without trial for the murder. The NKVD announced that he had been part of a Trotskyite centre in Leningrad which all party members were then ordered to guard against. ...read more.


However, out of the vast numbers shot by the NKVD, it is unlikely that more than a few were personally known to Stalin, and it was not he alone who selected the victims, even though he did authorize mass killings. These factors suggest that the 'Great Purge' and the show trials were not Stalin personally eradicating opposition, but were high ranking members of the Communist Party, loyal to Stalin trying to protect him from the so called threat of resistance in order to stay in his favour. However, whether Stalin was personally in control of these events or not, they still played a major part in the assertion of his authority over the USSR. Therefore by 1939, Stalin had succeeded by various means in gaining unquestionable authority over the Communist Party and the USSR. Aided by Lenin's system of a one party government, Stalin managed to remove all those seen as major or even minor threats to his position, both within and outside of the Communist Party. This resulted in what can be seen as a personal dictatorship over the USSR which was kept in place by the use of terror rather than due to mass support. Francesca Robson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    In the 1930's the peasants expressed their hatred of collectivisation by destroying their crops, animals and tools. This resulted in a wide spread famine which lasted for three years and killed between five and six million people. Source C is a biased cartoon published in Paris, the cartoon shows the results of Stalin's policies from an anti-communist view.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    However, the splendid benefits of the scheme can also not be forgotten. The fact that the output from heavy and light industries doubled, new chemical and machine tool industries were set up along with the mineral extraction excelling to very impressive extents all contributed to the funds that were raised.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Plans the country was not only improving but it was also causing misery to many of the Russian people. Production targets which were high were met, as workers did overtime and were over worked by the managers. This caused stress for many workers and this wasn't part of their normal

  2. How successful by 1939 had Stalin been in achieving his aims in the USSR?

    Stalin achieved this by cutting off the "Old Bolsheviks" and regarding them as the enemy and alienating them from his own party. He was able to do this by primarily emphasising on their different opinions, particularly regarding the "Permanent Revolution" policy and use this to distinguish himself from the others whilst undermining them.

  1. How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise ...

    The main difference was the terror in the 1920's was usually applied to obvious opponents of the party; whereas the terror in the 1930's was mainly against members of the party and against people had committed no offences to be considered as opposition.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    It seems Stalin had run out of people to kill, which in itself suggests that David Lowe thinks Stalin is not a good leader of the Soviet Union. Study Sources B and C. Both Give Different Opinions of Joseph Stalin's Rule.

  1. Assess the Impact Stalin Had On Russia and Its People Stalin came to ...

    By 1936 there were over 15,000 tractors on collectives over the USSR. Under collectivisation output had also increased. In 1937 there was a record harvest of 97 millions tons. Collectivisation also led to the shift of peasants from the countryside to the industrial areas.

  2. Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of ...

    This made him vulnerable as he lost the army, his most fervent supporters and his government post.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work