• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse of Tsarism in Russia

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the deciding factor in the collapse of Tsarism in Russia? Nicholas II's abdication in February 1917 marked the end of Tsarism in Russia and the end of over 100 years of Romanov rule. By the time the war broke out in 1914 almost every section of Russian society felt betrayed by the autocracy, in particular the peasants and the growing number of urban workers. The peasants increasingly resented being exploited by the nobility and governing elite, and although Tsar Alexander II had started to make reforms beginning with the Emancipation act in 1861, most of these reforms had little or no effect on the everyday lives of the peasantry. Although the war exacerbated these social problems, even before 1914 a revolution was inevitable. Opposition began to grow within the industrial workers, especially due to the violence of Bloody Sunday and the 1905 revolution, after which workers lost faith in the 'Little Father' and realised that under rule of the Tsar they were always going to be oppressed. By the beginning of 1917 even the military, Cossacks and members of the aristocracy wanted rid of the Tsarist regime. This change in attitudes was much stronger than it had been in 1905 as the suffering of the peoples was now much greater and the autocratic system in such a critical state. However, Russia's political structure was in a dire state even before the war. Peter Waldron notes: "The Imperial Russian state perished from its own weakness"1. ...read more.

Middle

It is clear that even before the war workers were dissatisfied. The large concentration of labourers in huge enterprises allowed the city workers to talk to one another each day and engage in the same everyday struggle to live, which resulted in a huge unified urban workforce. By consolidating thousands of workers on the same premises for years on end they developed into an unparalleled political entity. Libertarian historians emphasise this growing unrest and strength of the workers as an unequalled political unit as a critical factor in the collapse of Tsarism. They take the view that without the efforts of the working people the revolution would not have taken place. When war broke out in 1914 Russia was not equipped for a modern war, and from the very beginning it was clear that the Russian forces were inferior to the German military in everything but numbers. Though Russia had endured an embarrassing defeat to Japan in the Russo-Japanese war of 1905, she had not seemed to learn any lessons in the intervening years. The Russian fighting forces were very badly equipped and there were massive shortages of ammunition, weapons and food supplies, as well as poor leadership, particularly after the Tsar assumed sole command. In 1914 there was just one machine-gun allocated for every 1,000 men and rifles were similarly in short supply. This resulted in huge numbers of Russian casualties, mainly inexperienced peasant conscriptions. The railways were particularly inefficient when placed under the heavy demands of the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

army joining the protesting workers in Petrograd, Russia would have simply relapsed into a repeat of the 1905 'revolution' or at worst, a civil war. They consider it was the army Generals and police force that made the revolution possible. Michael Lynch stresses, "It was when the army and the police told Nicholas that they were unable to carry out his command to keep the populace in order that his position finally became hopeless"5. Though this view seems valid, it is questionable as to how much control the army and police would have had in repressing the masses revolting in Petrograd if they had remained loyal. The incentive for change was so great, and the political system in such a critical state that it is likely that even without support from the army a revolution would have occurred. In conclusion, although the war exacerbated Russia's problems and brought them to a head, WW1 was not the fundamental reason for the collapse of Tsarism. Russia's problems were deep-seated in the inept and corrupt political system. The avarice and need for power lay deeply rooted in the Tsar and governing elites and the aspirations of the peasants and workers would never have been met. The poor execution of the war and the huge loss of life with conscripted peasants and workers poorly equipped and treated as little more than cannon fodder increased the level of discontent and acted as a catalyst for revolution. However, even if Russia had been successful in the war Tsarism would still have unavoidably collapsed given the widespread and deep-seated injustice and distrust of the ruling regime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Explain Rasputin's contribution to the collapse of Tsarism.

    The first argument is that Rasputin played a major role in Russia's downfall. The first issue to be focused on is Rasputin's relationship with the Tsarina. Lots of people believed that they were having an affair, as the Tsar left Russia to lead the war, and Rasputin was left with the Tsarina.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    The Tsarist government was worried that this might set a precedent for the future, so that the Russian people may use force, disorder or violence to challenge the Tsar. This also indicates that Russia had entered a new era. However with the October Manifesto, the Tsar had acted in bad

  1. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    Wood argues that the emancipation and subsequent divide in society could lead only to revolution. This argument suggests that the downfall of Tsarism would have happened without the war, but it is still open to debate whether or not the war sped up or slowed down the downfall of Tsarism.

  2. How important was WW1 in causing the Russian Revolution of February 1917

    His problem was that he did not really accept the role of the Duma after 1905. He was also a bad judge in the appointment and dismissal of minters he dismissed all his war ministers and appointed himself chief in command of the army and they lost over a million men.

  1. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    to plan strikes. The Tsar was clearly losing control. Even some of his own army were supporting the revolutionaries. He needed to gain back some control. Nicholas issued the October Manifesto in which he granted freedom of speech, the right to form political parties and land for the peasants. He also agreed to the election of a parliament (Duma)

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    was in fact controlling Russia. This is why the cartoon shows this - because the opposition want to stir up discontent for the Tsar and his regime.

  1. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    It is also a huge negative because it makes it tremendously hard to unite the country and makes trade and exports a challenge with transport problems, again suggesting overall that this is another weakness of Russia in 1855. The backwardness of Russia is also element which is strongly indicating a weakness, due to industry remaining very low however some growth.

  2. Was World War 1 the main reason for the abdication of the Tsar

    of the Tsar because if Russia?s largest industry collapses because of angriness towards the Tsar then issues are sure to increase and pressure on his rule. World War One is seen by most as the main reason for the abdication of the Tsar.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work