• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did British governments deal with demands for Indian independence?For years the British tried to ignore Indian nationalism, having apparently convinced themselves

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(b) How did British governments deal with demands for Indian independence? For years the British tried to ignore Indian nationalism, having apparently convinced themselves that there were too many differences in Indian society for the Indians ever to form a united movement; there were social, regional and above all, religious differences especially between Hindus and Muslims. However, during the war, Hindus and Muslims began to work together to pressurize the British, who were slowly coming round to the idea that India would have to be given a measure of self In 1917 the Indians were promised 'the gradual development of self institutions with a view to the progressive realization of responsible government in India as an integral part of the British Empire'. ...read more.

Middle

and Lord Chelmsford (Viceroy) put forward plans which eventually became the Government of India Act (1919). There was to he a national parliament with two houses; about five million of the wealthiest Indians were given the vote; in the provincial governments the ministers of health, education and public works could now be Indians ; a commission would be held ten years later to decide whether India was ready for further concessions. Congress was bitterly disappointed because, although the new parliament had some powers, the really important decisions were still taken by the governor-general the British also kept control of the key provincial ministries such as law and order and taxation. ...read more.

Conclusion

Irwin was convinced that negotiations must take place, and he was fully supported in this view by Ramsay MacDonald who had just become Prime Minister. Consequently two Round Table Conferences were held in London (1930 and 1931). The first was unsatisfactory because, although the Indian princes were represented and accepted the idea of an Indian federation, no Congress representatives were there, because most of them were in prison. Irwin had them released and prevailed upon Gandhi to travel to London to attend the second conference, much to the horror of Churchill, who refused to meet him and described him as 'this malignant and subversive fanatic'. Again little progress was made, this time because of disagreements about Muslim representation in an independent Indian parliament. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What were the causes of Indian Independencein 1947, and was partition inevitable?

    There were a number of medium term causes leading up to the partition and independence of India. The first of these was the Morley Minto reforms of 1909. It was established after the setting up of the Congress Party in 1885 and the Muslim League to defend Hindu interests.

  2. Explain the features of the New Deal.

    The code would guarantee fair wages and conditions in return for fair prices and goods. Each industry had to agree on the employment code with the government. They had an emblem of a "blue eagle". The other act they introduced was the "Public Works Administration" (PWA)

  1. History: India Independence Coursework

    Source C supports source B by showing how India wanted to get rid of the British-rule. A weakness of source C is that, we don't know the exact date of when Jinnah made the statement or who he was talking to.

  2. Describe British rule in India at the end of the First World War.

    The Rowlatt Acts were intended to extend the Defence of India Act into peacetime. This act would enable the government to arrest and imprison any troublemakers without trial and allowed judges to try offenders without a jury. This was opposed by all Indian members of the Imperial Legislative Council.

  1. Roosevelt's New Deal

    William Lichtenberg Roosevelt was one of America's most popular presidents, he was the first that reached out to them and through the radio talked to them directly. It can be clearly seen that Roosevelt was responsible for his election victory in 1932 and to a very small extent not responsible.

  2. Morale of teh British in 1940

    The government would not want this to happen as it would obviously lead to anarchy. The Bethnal Green stampede was a great example of this. Over 103 people were killed in a mad struggle for shelter. This should not have come as a great shock as there were many events

  1. Why did a campaign for womens suffrage develop in the years after 1870?

    The Suffragettes continued to use a variety of methods, mostly in the form of direct action, ranging from disrupting meetings and tax resistance to burning buildings and refusing to cooperate with the police. Suffragettes were famous for chaining themselves to railings, including those outside 10 Downing Street, and making political

  2. Explain whether the work of Gandhi during the years 1918-1937 made independence for India ...

    Gandhi's ideas of swaraj, (self-rule) came about as he thought that his people had fallen victim to Western ideology and need to return to simple village life. The I.N.C believed India should gain dominion status, an independent country within an empire, like Canada.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work