• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western front during the First World War compare with a parliamentary infantryman serving in the English Civil War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did life for a typical soldier serving in a trench on the western front during the First World War compare with a parliamentary infantryman serving in the English Civil War? - Carys Edwards 9F The typical soldier serving in a trench on the western front during the First World War compared with a parliamentary infantryman serving in the English Civil War was very different compared to the typical soldier serving on the western front during the First World War mainly because the two wars were both at different times and settings. The English civil war took place during the 1640's and the First World War took between 1914-1918, 270 years between the two conflicts. The World War was widely based and the English civil war was only in England. But what were the other differences between the two wars? The reasons for fighting were very different. The English Civil War started with an argument between King Charles I and the members of Parliament which were often called parliamentarians. The Parliament thought they should have their own rights and freedom from the king and Charles claimed to rule by divine rights. The king refused to compromise with the Puritans who wanted their own privileges and more power for themselves. ...read more.

Middle

The British infantryman had a khaki uniform made of a fabric of twilled wool, webbing and a Lee Enfield rifle with a bayonet. He wore knee length boots and a hard metal helmet. Officers had flat caps and carried pistols. So overall the uniforms were better in the World war because they had more protection and they didn't have to rely on soldiers to get their own uniforms. They knew who was on their team or not even if they didn't know each other because of their hats. The weapons they used were very different. In the English Civil War they had soldiers called Pikemen. Pikemen carried a 5m long ash staff pike and a short bladed sword known as a "Hanger" for hand to hand fighting. Pikes were heavy and unwieldy and it required a strong man to use one correctly. The most common weapon used by a musketeer was a Matchlock Musket. A good well-trained musketeer could fire three rounds a minute unless his gunpowder became damp. He had a wooden ramrod to ram down the charge and the bullet made of cast lead which he usually made himself, a powder horn made from a cows horn used for carrying priming powder, and a fuse of slow-burning cord that had been boiled in vinegar then dried, kept lit at both ends during battle. ...read more.

Conclusion

So overall, life for a typical soldier in the First World War was nothing like that of a soldier in then English Civil War. In the First World War they had a lot more travelling to do and were fighting far from home, while in the English Civil War the soldiers stayed to fight in their own counties near their homes. Many of the soldiers were defending the country houses and castles. When the weather was poor some would even go home and others left the fighting all together. The soldiers in World War 1 were in trenches where the conditions were bad, they had no proper sanitation and suffered from dysentery, trench foot and trench fever caused by lice, and they lost more British soldiers in 1918 The victory year, than the whole of the world war 2 because of the men running into bullets when they had to go 'over the top' causing a big bombardment. During the winters the weather in Europe was bad and the men had to move through the deep snow with their weapons and heavy guns. There was more danger involved with more and better weapons and the heavy guns of the First World War, also the over head danger from planes. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women in world war one

    They would be recovering themselves from the smell of 'dope varnish' for more than 'half an hour', 'before being able to return to their toil'. This source is fairly reliable; she writes of her own experience and so we are forced to believe it, however, as she is a campaigner

  2. WHO WAS TO BLAME FOR THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR?

    The Puritan MPs also complained about the church and how had been decorated. The Parliament and James were arguing about lots of reasons they were arguing over money because James always never had enough money and he came from a poor background, which was Scotland.

  1. World War 1-Life in the Trenches

    People made very good friends in the army, friends that would be willing to die for you, when a friend died, it was very tragic and this didn't help to make the soldiers feel better. Though there was a very different scenario in England.

  2. World war 1

    Both sides used chlorine or mustard gas which is poisonous gases; they were used to try to kill the enemy's front line of soldiers. It was not very reliable and both sides carried masks, so it was not used much in the later part of the war.

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    Haig believed that along with Parliament that Britain must believe that the soldiers are doing well and that there is a strong chances that they are going to win the war. The way in which he does this is by sending out a report saying how high the men's spirits are and how confident the commanders are.

  2. Poems and stories; official accounts Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    Frankau, the poet, fought in the war for Britain from its outbreak in 1914. He later progressed to become a captain. This is evidence that this source is reliable because he would have had first hand experience of war and known how it affected him and fellow soldiers.

  1. The nations old ways of life and thought perished in the mud of Flanders. ...

    This lead to the working-class wanting to be better represented, which led to the emergence of the Labour party, and in hand, a loss of votes for the Liberals. The Labour party became popular around 1920, and saw their first prime minister, win the election of 1924, under Ramsay MacDonald.

  2. What was life like for fighting men on the Western Front?

    The trenches were arranged in a zigzag formation this was done so that if an enemy would get into the trench they could not fire at them in a straight line. There were different types of trenches all for different things: Communications Trench.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work