• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

how did protestant politicians explain social economic and political differences between catholics and protestants

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholic and Protestant? The government in Northern Ireland has been mainly protestant since 1922 when the parliament was set up. There were two types of politicians... those who were extremist like Reverend Ian Paisley and those who were more moderate like O'Neill [from the Ulster Unionist party]; although both believed that Catholics wanted to become more powerful and end the discriminations they claimed took place against them. Catholics suffered many social, economic and political differences like lower quality education, unfair job and housing allocation and virtually no support in the government to help them in their struggle for equality. ...read more.

Middle

Catholics had therefore become poor because of their laziness in comparisation to the traditional protestant work ethic. The government tried to explain the unjust council-housing allocation and the difference in employment by saying that protestants were more loyal than Catholics... as Ian Paisley said: "if jobs are scarce Protestants should get these jobs". Amongst politicians there were different views. Some claimed that there was no discrimination whilst others said that "religion was blind" and that Protestants should have preference over the Catholic second-class citizens. O'Neill saw Catholics as the problem to public order and peace, and that Protestant people in Northern Ireland ought to be dominant over the Catholic population. ...read more.

Conclusion

and to achieve this they'd want to destroy the actual Northern Ireland. Despite all of these accusations the Catholic Church in the Irish republic did nothing to help... Still, some politicians claim that all people face disadvantages economically and politically and that discrimination occurred regardless of religion; it was impossible to keep everyone happy. This was done to take importance to the fact that Catholics were being segregated in all senses by the racist politicians who had to say that they were a threat for their Protestant-country simply because they had different ideas. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. How did Protestant Politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and ...

    So he set up the Free Presbyterian Church and preached everything that he believed was right, telling Protestants not to trust the Catholics. They were also scared of being ruled from Rome (Rome Rule). This would mean that everybody would have to live under Catholic laws, for example no Contraception or abortion.

  2. How Did the Catholics Grow To hate the Protestants?

    refused to wear prison clothes, remained naked except for a blanket and they sat in their cells and refused to wash or clean their cells. Some prisoners also spread faeces on the walls and urinated on the floor and their mattresses; this is why it was also called the 'Dirty Protest'.

  1. How did the Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholic ...

    This happened because there were many people against him, even his fellow Unionist party members, such as Ian Paisley and his followers. A hard line Unionist that agreed with Ian Paisley was Basil Brooke. He was the Prime Minister of Northern Ireland from 1943 to 1963 and believed the Catholics posed a threat to the security of Ulster.

  2. Ireland - What are the main differences between the beliefs of the Republicans/Nationalists and ...

    When the Anglo-Irish agreement was introduced he was not happy and said he would 'Never, never, never.' accept the agreement. He used similar tactics to those of Carson in 1912. In general, Unionists see Home Rule as a problem that can lead to violence and as many don't like this idea, they will accept a compromise.

  1. How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and ...

    Other politicians said that the Catholics did have good jobs and were not discriminated against at all. The talk of discrimination against the Catholics was seen as Catholic fiction. Politicians like Ian Paisley admitted that there were differences between the Protestants and the Catholics but he said that these differences

  2. How Did Protestant Politicians Explain the Social, Economic and Political Differences Between the Way ...

    By 1967 Polls were showing support for O'Neill's leadership from both Catholics and Protestants. O'Neill thought that by treating Catholics fairly and equally, they would feel accepted and that lessen the problems caused by the feelings of discrimination. O'Neill had developed a lot of support, many shared his optimistic view

  1. How did Protestant politicians explain the social economic and political differences between Catholics and ...

    The talk of discrimination against the Catholics was seen as Catholic fiction. Politicians like Ian Paisley admitted that there were differences between the Protestants and the Catholics but he said that these differences were necessary to sustain the loyalty of the Protestant majority.

  2. How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholic and ...

    Nicra were not violent and O'Neill was happy for them to campaign if they were not violent. He thought that the campaigns and marches would be ok because if they were non violent there would be no reason for the Protestants to attack them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work