• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and Protestants?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and Protestants? The Political views of Northern Ireland are split; this 'Division amongst Unionists' (Ironic?) have made many controversial arguments. There are two types of protestant politicians, there are the peaceful and democratic moderates like O'Neill who only see Catholics, as problems to public order and peace and who think the Protestant people of Northern Ireland should be dominant over the Catholic population. On the other hand, extremists like Reverend Ian Paisley. These extremist political leaders think Catholics are 'demonic' or 'satanic' and believe that they are foreign peoples to Northern Ireland. ...read more.

Middle

Under Prime Minister Sean Lemass (Elected 1959, served until 1966), Ireland's sluggish economy was given a boost. The First Programme for Economic Expansion, economic mobility, consumer spending, and foreign trade increased, while emigration decreased. In spite of this newfound economic stability, Ireland still had a difficult time joining the European Economic Community, as did Britain. In the worldwide oil crisis and ensuing recession forced Ireland into deflation, which inspired efforts to tax farmers' incomes, and wealth taxes. This obviously didn't create a good image of Prime Minister Cosgrove in the public eye, and Jack Lynch of Fianna F�il was re-elected in 1977. The Fianna F�il proposed to cut taxes and borrow money from other nations to get back on its feet. ...read more.

Conclusion

Protestant saw no real Catholic case in the matter and mocked the Civil Rights Protesters. The Protestant Politicians justified their discrimination against the catholic people with their own righteousness, claiming steak to the whole of the north of Ireland and politically pushing the Catholics off the scene, using Gerrymandering and force to move the Catholics into their own area of Ireland, labelling them as evil and satanic so that they might want to leave and go back to Southern Ireland. The main goal of the political injustice was to reinforce the Unionist sight so that the rest of Ireland would be taken into the sway of the British Empire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Ireland - What are the main differences between the beliefs of the Republicans/Nationalists and ...

    The Home Rule situations still affect Unionists today. It was not an issue that was 'put to bed', it has always been an area of conflict. It arises in many of today's peace attempts and proposed agreements. It has never been solved, but steps have been and still are being taken to try and settle the issue.

  2. How Did the Catholics Grow To hate the Protestants?

    This time, there was Nationalist support and marches were organised. The first hunger strike ended in confusion in December, because the strikers believed they had been granted their demands but they were wrong. So a second hunger strike began in March 1981.

  1. Ireland's incredible economic success has left many countries in complete fascination.

    Ireland as a result was an attractive destination for foreign direct investment because it gave access to the EU and importantly was an English speaking country, the language that was used to trade. Another benefit of membership of the EU to Ireland was the structural funds, which were invested in infrastructure such as roads, airports and universities.

  2. How did Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholic and ...

    Just because this rule would have been fair the Unionists did not like this because this meant that it would probably be closer votes and the Nationalists might actually win the elections. This was one of the reasons which helped towards his down fall because the Unionists just wanted to

  1. How did the Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between the ...

    They didn't feel that it was right for the Catholics to have an equal amount of Catholics seat in the parliament, as there was a minority of Catholics in the country. Politicians easily argued that the Protestants worked harder and they certainly deserved to have a government in their favour, or a government with a protestant majority (Democrat).

  2. How did Protestant Politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and ...

    Protestants believed that they were superior in Northern Ireland because they were the majority. They also believed they were superior because they were forward looking which meant they were planning for the future. There was one final reason which they believed was the most important.

  1. What are the main differences between the Catholics and the Protestants

    They both feel British forces protect them from terrorism. They are the minority in Ireland as a whole but the majority in Northern Ireland. They don't want a United Ireland as they feel they will be under Catholic control. They feel they have nothing in common with Catholics, who tried to stab Britain in the back during the First

  2. How did the Protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholic ...

    and strong views on issues such as abortion and contraception would have to be considered.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work