How did protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and Protestants?

Authors Avatar

How did protestant politicians explain the social, economic and political differences between Catholics and Protestants?

The Political views of Northern Ireland are split; this ‘Division amongst Unionists’ (Ironic?) have made many controversial arguments. There are two types of protestant politicians, there are the peaceful and democratic moderates like O’Neill who only see Catholics, as problems to public order and peace and who think the Protestant people of Northern Ireland should be dominant over the Catholic population. On the other hand, extremists like Reverend Ian Paisley. These extremist political leaders think Catholics are ‘demonic’ or ‘satanic’ and believe that they are foreign peoples to Northern Ireland. People like Paisley also think that Catholics have loyalties elsewhere and that Catholics are completely untrustworthy. Both the Moderate and Extremist parties believe that there is a huge threat of insider help from Catholics to others and the Catholics making a Nationalist foothold in Northern Ireland.

Join now!

        Something else was that the Protestants saw that the Civil Rights protests always seemed to favour the catholic end of the line which made the Protestants resentful and angry, this pushed them to try and stop the protests and began to ignore them, this angered the Catholics very much and they began using violent protest as a way to get what they wanted and needed

        While there was still an economic recession in Ireland around the 1960’s, the country tried as hard as it could to keep aloft. Under Prime Minister Sean Lemass (Elected 1959, served until 1966), Ireland’s sluggish ...

This is a preview of the whole essay