• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s? Why did Stalin make the Great Turn? General Overview... * The NEP under the Soviet Union had recovered from seven years of warfare (1914-1921). However, by 1927, the industry had not developed much from the pre-1914 level, and agriculture was still severely backward. * By the late 1920s the NEP was presenting the Communists with a variety of economic and social problems. Stalin and the majority of the party felt that the NEP was not delivering the economic performance or the type of society that had been envisaged. * The Communists wanted to press on with rapid industrialisation to build a socialist society. What were the Driving forces behind Stalin's economic policies? * The overriding aim of Stalin's policies was to industrialise and modernise the USSR as quickly as possible. * Stalin wanted 'backward Russia' to become the 'Soviet America', for the Russians to beat the Capitalists at their own game and to become a force to be reckoned with world over. * There were a number of reasons, both practical and ideological to force the pace upon this issue. Why did Stalin want to industrialise the USSR so quickly? ...read more.

Middle

So the peasants had to sell theirs at much lower prices to be able to pay their taxes. * Although this plan had worked initially, the peasants soon got wise to the government's ploy. Since meat prices were still going up, they started to feed grain to their animals rather than sell it at the lower prices. Also, they found that there was not much point in having surplus money because there was little that they could buy with it, since industrial consumer goods were still in short supply, so the peasants started to hold back their grain from the market, hoping for the price to rise. As a result, the grain procured by the state at the end of 1927 was about 3/4 of what it had been in 1926. Was the NEP working for the Urban Workers? * The NEP had not brought great rewards for the urban workers, although they were better off than at any time before the revolution, real wages had, by 1928, only just passed the pre-war level. True, they had an eight-hour working day and other social benefits, and in state-run factories they had some power. Local trade union representatives often sat on a panel running the factory alongside the specialist director (usually an old Bourgeois manager). ...read more.

Conclusion

Historians suggest that the USSR would have done better to continue with the NEP! (Reference Page 197). Summary of the Great Turn... a. The NEP was not producing the sort of Society that many Communists wanted by the end of the 1920s. b. There was a continuing debate about the NEP in the Communist party throughout the 1920s the right wing of the party want to keep it and the left wing wanted to end it. c. No Communists liked the outward manifestations of the NEP - the Nepmen and the strength of the private market. Nor did they like being held to ransom by the peasants. d. Urban workers and Communist party members wanted to move forward to take the revolution on and build a Socialist Society. e. The workers were suffering from high unemployment rates and very low wages. f. The peasantry were starting to hold back food from the market and food shortages were extremely serious in 1928-28. g. There was a War scare in 1928, which increased the Soviet Union fears about their invulnerability to attack and that from this they may need to produce armaments urgently. h. In 1928, the decision was taken to end the NEP and to embark in a massive industrialisation programme in the Five-Year Plans. i. This has been called the Great Turn and it marked a significant shift, economically, politically and culturally - in the history of the Soviet Union. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Many leading figures like Kamenev, Bukharin and Zinoviev were put on trial because they were traitors of the nation and additionally other non leading figures were put on trial like 500,00 party members on charges of anti Soviet activities and were either executed or sent to labour camps.

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    In 1936 he shifted his position and backed the radicals. This was probably encouraged by concerns that the Stakhanovite movement was being obstructed by industrial managers and the demands of radicals that the secret police should be let loose on these 'wreckers'.

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    A new article was added to the Criminal Code - Article 58 - which defined new offences that were counter-revolutionary and stated that persons who fled abroad could be executed and families of defectors imprisoned or exiled. With Stalin pursuing class conflict, he had reason for more fear from dissidents

  2. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    However, this was only true for the traditional industrial areas, with the agricultural regions remaining impoverished., Output in steel, iron and electricity had more than doubled but although claims were made in both the 4th and 4th 5-Year Plans to improving living conditions and agricultural efficiency, in reality, little was done until Khrushchev's era.

  1. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    A historical parallel to Stalin's purges using brutal tactics on a large scale through the use of the NKVD to handle opposition is Lenin's use of widespread torture and executions through the Cheka to deal with counter-revolutionaries during the Civil War.

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This suggests Stalin was not reasonable, and didn't take it seriously. In the source, we can see that Stalin is the only one sitting down, which shows he thinks he's better than everyone else which completely goes against his belief of equality.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Due to the new dams and hydroelectric power stations that were getting built at a high speed as well as the electricity production rocketing, Stalin also didn't have to worry about where he was to get his energy source from to run his industries.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    The evidence of this is shown in that Stalin created a USSR that concerned some of the largest nations of the time. I think that this is due to its strength. Also, I think that Stalin recognised the importance of foreign affairs, and this is evident in the creation of Comniform.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work