• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s? Why did Stalin make the Great Turn? General Overview... * The NEP under the Soviet Union had recovered from seven years of warfare (1914-1921). However, by 1927, the industry had not developed much from the pre-1914 level, and agriculture was still severely backward. * By the late 1920s the NEP was presenting the Communists with a variety of economic and social problems. Stalin and the majority of the party felt that the NEP was not delivering the economic performance or the type of society that had been envisaged. * The Communists wanted to press on with rapid industrialisation to build a socialist society. What were the Driving forces behind Stalin's economic policies? * The overriding aim of Stalin's policies was to industrialise and modernise the USSR as quickly as possible. * Stalin wanted 'backward Russia' to become the 'Soviet America', for the Russians to beat the Capitalists at their own game and to become a force to be reckoned with world over. * There were a number of reasons, both practical and ideological to force the pace upon this issue. Why did Stalin want to industrialise the USSR so quickly? ...read more.

Middle

So the peasants had to sell theirs at much lower prices to be able to pay their taxes. * Although this plan had worked initially, the peasants soon got wise to the government's ploy. Since meat prices were still going up, they started to feed grain to their animals rather than sell it at the lower prices. Also, they found that there was not much point in having surplus money because there was little that they could buy with it, since industrial consumer goods were still in short supply, so the peasants started to hold back their grain from the market, hoping for the price to rise. As a result, the grain procured by the state at the end of 1927 was about 3/4 of what it had been in 1926. Was the NEP working for the Urban Workers? * The NEP had not brought great rewards for the urban workers, although they were better off than at any time before the revolution, real wages had, by 1928, only just passed the pre-war level. True, they had an eight-hour working day and other social benefits, and in state-run factories they had some power. Local trade union representatives often sat on a panel running the factory alongside the specialist director (usually an old Bourgeois manager). ...read more.

Conclusion

Historians suggest that the USSR would have done better to continue with the NEP! (Reference Page 197). Summary of the Great Turn... a. The NEP was not producing the sort of Society that many Communists wanted by the end of the 1920s. b. There was a continuing debate about the NEP in the Communist party throughout the 1920s the right wing of the party want to keep it and the left wing wanted to end it. c. No Communists liked the outward manifestations of the NEP - the Nepmen and the strength of the private market. Nor did they like being held to ransom by the peasants. d. Urban workers and Communist party members wanted to move forward to take the revolution on and build a Socialist Society. e. The workers were suffering from high unemployment rates and very low wages. f. The peasantry were starting to hold back food from the market and food shortages were extremely serious in 1928-28. g. There was a War scare in 1928, which increased the Soviet Union fears about their invulnerability to attack and that from this they may need to produce armaments urgently. h. In 1928, the decision was taken to end the NEP and to embark in a massive industrialisation programme in the Five-Year Plans. i. This has been called the Great Turn and it marked a significant shift, economically, politically and culturally - in the history of the Soviet Union. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Rationing was abolished in 1936, as the rationing of bread and meat was scrapped in 1935. Consequently due to Industrialisation unemployment levels fell also some reports do suggest that the workers were satisfied with the working conditions. Unfortunately for workers Stalin changed their working days by revealing that instead of

  2. To what extent were the sufferings of the Soviet people in the 1930s a ...

    The government often encouraged people to attack the kulaks. In December 1929 Stalin announced that the kulaks were to be sent to concentration camps in places like Siberia. Their land was confiscated and given to local kolkhoz. In 1934 all the kulaks were wiped out. In February 1930 over half the peasants in Russia had joined the collective farms, but the grain shortage problem had not been solved.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    working in millions in the Capitalists countries of America, Europe, Asia and the Far East where a substantial monetary crash led to mass employment throughout the 1930s. At least they didn't have to queue for charity hand outs of food or were forced to live in shanty towns made of

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Figures do not support any success in collectivisation theses figures taken from a history learning site from the UK: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/collectivisation2.htm. This website shows that collectivisation was a disaster these figures show than by 1935 agricultural output was only just at the level in 1928 if not lower.

  1. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    supposedly designed to rid the nation of traitors, for this he utilised show trials to install fear within his citizens and used his secret police to further enhance this image of always being watched. Indeed Robert Tucker writes in his 'Stalin in power' that Stalin "became more embittered, solitary, vengeful and dangerous".

  2. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    This also made the reputation of the Tsar to drop. So this was also the reason why the Tsarist rule ended. World War One and the collapse of the army was another cause of the March Revolution which led to the end of the Tsarist rule.

  1. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    peasants, workers, increasing Bolshevik control and improving personal freedom, all of this was taken away through war communism, which left children starving during a famine in 1921 and many harsh punishments were handed out for things as petty as not handing over surplus to the government.

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    If there were fewer people moving to the cities, there would be less need to improve and expand on urban infrastructure. Every move that Stalin made, was to save money or to settle his paranoia about being overthrown, and this was no exception.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work