• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s? Why did Stalin make the Great Turn? General Overview... * The NEP under the Soviet Union had recovered from seven years of warfare (1914-1921). However, by 1927, the industry had not developed much from the pre-1914 level, and agriculture was still severely backward. * By the late 1920s the NEP was presenting the Communists with a variety of economic and social problems. Stalin and the majority of the party felt that the NEP was not delivering the economic performance or the type of society that had been envisaged. * The Communists wanted to press on with rapid industrialisation to build a socialist society. What were the Driving forces behind Stalin's economic policies? * The overriding aim of Stalin's policies was to industrialise and modernise the USSR as quickly as possible. * Stalin wanted 'backward Russia' to become the 'Soviet America', for the Russians to beat the Capitalists at their own game and to become a force to be reckoned with world over. * There were a number of reasons, both practical and ideological to force the pace upon this issue. Why did Stalin want to industrialise the USSR so quickly? ...read more.

Middle

So the peasants had to sell theirs at much lower prices to be able to pay their taxes. * Although this plan had worked initially, the peasants soon got wise to the government's ploy. Since meat prices were still going up, they started to feed grain to their animals rather than sell it at the lower prices. Also, they found that there was not much point in having surplus money because there was little that they could buy with it, since industrial consumer goods were still in short supply, so the peasants started to hold back their grain from the market, hoping for the price to rise. As a result, the grain procured by the state at the end of 1927 was about 3/4 of what it had been in 1926. Was the NEP working for the Urban Workers? * The NEP had not brought great rewards for the urban workers, although they were better off than at any time before the revolution, real wages had, by 1928, only just passed the pre-war level. True, they had an eight-hour working day and other social benefits, and in state-run factories they had some power. Local trade union representatives often sat on a panel running the factory alongside the specialist director (usually an old Bourgeois manager). ...read more.

Conclusion

Historians suggest that the USSR would have done better to continue with the NEP! (Reference Page 197). Summary of the Great Turn... a. The NEP was not producing the sort of Society that many Communists wanted by the end of the 1920s. b. There was a continuing debate about the NEP in the Communist party throughout the 1920s the right wing of the party want to keep it and the left wing wanted to end it. c. No Communists liked the outward manifestations of the NEP - the Nepmen and the strength of the private market. Nor did they like being held to ransom by the peasants. d. Urban workers and Communist party members wanted to move forward to take the revolution on and build a Socialist Society. e. The workers were suffering from high unemployment rates and very low wages. f. The peasantry were starting to hold back food from the market and food shortages were extremely serious in 1928-28. g. There was a War scare in 1928, which increased the Soviet Union fears about their invulnerability to attack and that from this they may need to produce armaments urgently. h. In 1928, the decision was taken to end the NEP and to embark in a massive industrialisation programme in the Five-Year Plans. i. This has been called the Great Turn and it marked a significant shift, economically, politically and culturally - in the history of the Soviet Union. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    High discipline meant that if you were just twenty minutes late for work, you could be fined, lose your ration card or be sacked. Food was rationed to the workers and everyone got an equal share however some did suffer from malnutrition.

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    The Tsar had still not delivered any of his other promises mentioned in the manifesto and it was clear that he was not prepared to do so. The people of Russia were now very disappointed in the Tsar. By this point, Rasputin had entered the picture.

  1. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    The utility of this source is good because it may have been produced by an historian who has the benefit of hindsight and the opening up of soviet records. So the historian would have access to the real figures. The sources motives are not dubious as they were put on

  2. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    These differences were made more bitter by the need to remedy massive problems associated with the five year plans. Ordzhonikidze, commissar for heavy industry since 1932, believed that industrial targets should be more realistic. He resisted attempts by the secret police to make factory managers the scapegoats for problems in the economy.

  1. Did Stalin pervert the message of the "real communists?"

    As the saying goes "all power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." This inherent thirst for power amongst humans was then coupled with Stalin's personal need for attention and he aimed at and achieved complete and unchallenged power for himself.

  2. How important was Stalin compared to Lenin in creating the Soviet Union?

    supposedly designed to rid the nation of traitors, for this he utilised show trials to install fear within his citizens and used his secret police to further enhance this image of always being watched. Indeed Robert Tucker writes in his 'Stalin in power' that Stalin "became more embittered, solitary, vengeful and dangerous".

  1. How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?

    in producing more occurred meaning more and more production was increasing through to the first and second five year plans. Overall I Believe Stalin was more influential in this case because although Lenin tried to redeem himself with the NEP some production was still lower than pre 1914 therefore not enough was happening quickly enough.

  2. Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of ...

    Trotsky could have turned the situation round if he was less dogmatic and show the Party members that he would not become a dictator. But instead of doing so, he confirmed their fear by being extremely stubborn on things that he believed was right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work