• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the black people differ in their tactics for gaining civil rights?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did the black people differ in their tactics for gaining civil rights? In the early 1960's the civil rights movement for black people became divided. This was mainly due to the number of different groups desperately trying to gain civil rights however sharing different views between them. This wasn't the only reason people disagreed another is that people may have had past experiences which could have made them have a different view of the Civil Rights movement for instance they might have been assaulted by someone who was against the Civil Rights movement. Secondly, black people may have disagreed on the best way to gain Civil Rights simply because of their religious beliefs. An example of this is that somebody may have approached the movement in a non-violent way because their religion states that violence is not the best way. Lastly, black people may have disagreed because one wanted gradual change and the other wanted immediate change. ...read more.

Middle

The NAACP didn't only use litigation strategies they also used peaceful marches. In 1963 the march on Washington for jobs and freedom took place. Congress passed a civil rights bill aimed at ending racial discrimination in employment, education and public accommodations in 1964, followed by a righting votes act in 1965. Moreover the NAACP's main ways to gain Civil Rights were the use of litigation, peaceful marches and boycotts however this may differ from other groups. The second group which sought to game Civil Rights was the SCLC. Its main leader was Martin Luther King. Ding its first few years SCLC activities were focused primarily on education and voter registration. They were often criticised by younger activists in groups such as SNCC (Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee) for not being active enough which shows that people disagreed. Their tactics were committed to using a Non-Violent approach to tackling Civil Rights which is similar to which the NAACP approached the Civil Rights movement. ...read more.

Conclusion

Equally, these groups promoted non-violence; though there were still obvious differences among tactics used to achieve civil rights. The SNCC stressed the significance of sorting out issues with no support of political participation. The black panthers lead my Malcolm X were against none violence and prompted self-defence. The Black Panther party's focus on militancy came with a reputation for violence. They often took advantage of a California law which permitted carrying a load rifle or shotgun as long as it was publicly displayed and pointed at no one. The Black Panther party was formed in 1966 by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale openly used violence against their white counterparts. They wanted blacks to pick up the gun and used riots or violent protests to gain civil rights. Although Martin Luther King and the SCLC did not encourage or directly use violence he knew through bus boycotts and non - violence indirectly gaining media attention in the process. This use of not using direct deliberate violence allowed King to gain sympathy and support from more liberal whites. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Black Death diary

    They'd had to raise the workers' wages as there weren't enough people. The workers actually threatened them of leaving! Before, it was easy to find someone else, in fact too many people wanted a job; now, there weren't enough workers!

  2. Martin luther king

    It was the rank and file and the ordinary person that took this act and gave it the power to succeed. This made MLK's job a lot easier, so in this incident MLK was not the most important factor. Another factor that MLK did not take part in was local

  1. The Rebecca Riots

    The writer was not biased towards the riots; it's neutral because it's an extract for a newspaper. It's a useful source because it gives details about the riots. It could be argued that it's biased in the sense that this article is trying to sell papers.

  2. Comparing Martin Luther King Jr. & Malcolm X

    way out to solve this problem since whites have no moral conduct and no conscience. Malcolm wanted and encourages people to give up their Christianity and blamed everything in relation to the whites for example he blamed the increase in crime rates in the black communities to the blacks that is following the white society.

  1. Do you agree that Martin Luther King was the most important factor in helping ...

    as it was a non religious group and was fighting, not for a separate state for Blacks, but for pure Human rights. However, the willingness to use violence may have given the wrong idea about the general picture of Black people.

  2. English civil war project - causes, battles and tactics

    This parliament had remained dissmissed for so long it was called the long parliement. 6. : weapons and tatics used: weapons: mortar: this weapon is easy to use and can be used by one man alone, a explosive shell is fired in the air and explodes.

  1. Do you agree that Martin Luther King was the most important factor in helping ...

    the cause and in particular, the actions of men like Bull Connor and Sheriff Jim Clark. King exploited the press, using it to put blacks in a better light than the whites that attacked them. It again proved that despite being attacked and beaten they could still rise above it and not retaliate which would have earned them some respect.

  2. Describe the aims, tactics and leaders of the opposition groups to apartheid. What were ...

    He died in 1993. Albert Lutuli was born in 1898. He was forced to resign as a Zulu chief for supporting the Defiance Campaign against apartheid. Lutuli became president of the ANC in 1952, and was a strong supporter of the Freedom Charter.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work