How did the historian interpret the forge mill needle site and is it an accurate representation of working conditions in the nineteenth century?

Authors Avatar

How did the historian interpret the forge mill needle site and is it an accurate representation of working conditions in the nineteenth century?

I think that the Forge Mill needle museum is an accurate representation of working conditions in the nineteenth century because the mill has been left as it is since it was decommissioned and has been used as a museum ever since.  

The outside of the mill has been changed by the putting in of handrails a recent addition of a walkway from the north to the west wing these are not reliable pieces of evidence.  The water-wheel is still active and powers the mill.  The outside of the mill is an accurate interpretation because it has only been changed in the ways mentioned earlier.

The top floor of the museum has been renovated and changed into an exhibition for different types of needles, what is now the museum was the needle furnishing shop and was used to prepare the needles for shipping.  This is not interpreted well as it is now a museum and bears no resemblance to a furnishing shop.  The purpose of this area of the mill was to

Join now!

The upper scouring mill is still as it was when it was decommissioned, this was used in the nineteenth century to clean the needles after they had been hardened, the evidence for this is that the machines still work.  All of this has not been changed so as to educate others to the dreadful working conditions of the time and to educate about needle making.  This is interpreted well because it is kept pretty much as it was at the end of the nineteenth century and all the dust and grime that would have been there when it was ...

This is a preview of the whole essay