• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...


How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union? Joseph Stalin was born in Georgia in 1879. Stalin was educated in a religious college but was expelled for revolutionary activities. He then became a member of the Bolshevik Party, he used to organise bank robberies and was jailed a few times. After the November revolution Stalin was given more power and was promoted by Lenin. Stalin was a good organiser and would get jobs done. Lenin then made Stalin General Secretary of the Communist Party. Stalin became very powerful. After Lenin's death there were two sides competing for leadership of Russia, Stalin presented himself in the middle, but he then joined the 'Right opposition' and defeated their rivalry. Stalin then stabbed them in their back by turning against them; they were expelled from the government. Stalin now was in complete control. Before Stalin came to power Russia was in a terrible state, there was a huge problem of feeding the Russian people. When Lenin was in charge he set up the New Economic Policy, this made small factories being able to be privatised (controlled by the owners, not the government), but the government controlled important industries such as coal and steel. Peasants had to give a fixed amount of what they grew to the government, the rest they could sell to make a profit. Now more food was being produced because peasants had an incentive to grow more. But the prices of food fell as more was produced. Prices of industrial goods rose so therefore the peasants selling food wouldn't be able to gain much money to buy goods; they'd be better off keeping the food for themselves. The peasants then began to produce less food, and Russia's problem worsened. When Stalin came to power he believed that the N.E.P. should be abandoned and industry and agriculture should be taken under direct government control. ...read more.


Stakhanovites caused tremendous pressure in the industries to exceed targets. Some workers disliked the pressure on them to become Stakhanovites. The first five-year plan only dealt with capitol industries, mainly goods such as coal, cement, steel and machine tools were being produced. These products were needed to build up industry. So there was a shortage of consumer goods such as clothes, furniture and radios. The consumer goods, which were available, were usually at very high prices, ordinary people didn't have enough money to buy these goods so did without. The government told the workers they'd have to make sacrifices now to have a better future. Life was very hard for the women because there was a shortage of workers, women were expected to work full time and also look after their homes. The goods that were produced were often of poor quality; factory managers were only concerned of how much was being made not the quality. The quantity produced was more important that the quality of the goods. Soviet goods where not as good as the western ones. Also the quality suffered because the majority of the workforce were unskilled and poorly trained. It is safe to say that the five-year plans were highly successful but at the cost of the peoples lives. The government were only concerned about the mass production of goods not the quality. Stalin turned Russia from a backward agricultural country to an industrial super power in less than 10 years; this was a huge achievement for Stalin. Stalin was able to run Russia's industry far better than her agriculture. A lot of lives were lost in industrialising Russia, but this industrialisation saved many more lives when Germany tried to invade the Soviet Union. Overall I feel that Stalin's five-year plans were successful in industrialising Russia, but other less ruthless methods could have been used to achieve that success. Stalin used political terror with his economic policies. ...read more.


This type of art was optimistic and showed happy workers. Artists weren't allowed to use fantasy. Sculptors and painters were expected to only produce socialist realism art, for example statues of muscular men, women working and painting of peasants joining the collective farms. Stalin and Zhdanov despised modern music because it was too complicated for peasants to understand. They didn't like foreign music and composers had to produce music which followed rules set by the government, so that ordinary peasants would be able to understand the music. Stalin only played optimistic, cheerful and patriotic music. Stalin used socialist realism to brain wash the soviet citizens to work, be determined and be optimistic. Overall I feel that Stalin achieved most of his goals, industry had more than doubled, most of the soviet people were under government control and Stalin's enemies were annihilated. Stalin failed to reach the five-year plans targets, but this does not mean that the five-year plans were a failure because Stalin dramatically increased industry. This massive industrial increase enabled the Russians to beat the Germans in the war. However there was a tremendous loss of life due to Stalin's purges. But I believe that Stalin saved more lives by industrialising Russia because if the Germans had invaded Russia there would have been more lives lost. Even though there was a big loss of life, casualties would have been expected for such a huge operation like this to be carried out. The following quotation aggress with my view: 'Stalin transformed Russia from a backward country into one of the two greatest Powers in the world, with its industrial and intellectual resources multiplied many times over. He brought it safely through a terrible war. It is hard to say the same result could be achieved at less cost. But the cost was certainly exorbitant...' from the obituary in The Guardian newspaper published in England on 6 March 1953. I think that Stalin could have used a less brutal way of achieving this success of turning backward Russia into an industrial super power. Fezan Shakir 11SNR - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    With this title came better housing, free holidays and cash prizes. Any worker in their right mind would most definitely want to have these privileges for both themselves and their families. However, some people did not like these Stakhanovites as they increased the amount of work each worker had to achieve in a day's work.

  2. How Successful Were Stalin's Policies During His Leadership of the Soviet Union?

    This process began after an agricultural crisis with peasant hoarding of grain due a fear that the capitalist powers would launch an attack on Russia. In response to this Stalin began to extract grain from peasants through extensive coercion and reverted to the coercive tactics of War Communism by setting

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Collectivisation consisted of grouping small, scattered farms in a given locality into a collective farm (Kolkhozy). The peasants would hand over their grain, animals, tools and labour for the utility of the entire community. The collectives had to sell most of their produce at low prices to the government.

  2. Free essay

    The League of Nations was formed in 1919 to encourage the member countries to ...

    Also although many were angry with the Tsar, as many of them had remained loyal until Bloody Sunday, the protest which was held on the 22nd January 1905 was a peaceful one. This made it easier for the Nicholas to survive as the protestors had not made it a violent

  1. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    From 1929 to 1940 the number of collective farms per 1000 has increased nearly five times. So depending on who you were collectivisation could be interpreted as a success for him as he got his collective farms and he now controlled agriculture.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Firstly, the source was published in Paris so we can assume that it will be against Stalin because Western, capitalist countries were scared that communism would spread and they feared this. Many Western countries also used propaganda, like Stalin, but to turn people away from communism by highlighting the failures.

  1. "The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially ...

    Bourgeois parties and their newspapers, and this was later extended to all other political parties. The Bolsheviks also took control of many local Soviets and opposition groups were disbanded or went underground. Thus a Bolshevik dictatorship was essentially already in place by July 1918.

  2. What methods did Stalin use to control the Soviet Union?

    This plan consisted of 5 year plans that were basically targets to increase production in industry over the given time period. The reasons for the introduction of this method was firstly to provide enough machinery to mechanize farming and agriculture, enable Stalin to control the production of goods, to have

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work