• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the Tsar control the Russian people between 1905 and the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did the Tsar control the Russian people between 1905 and the First World War? After the 1905 revolution, the Tsar was under a lot of pressure to abdicate. However, he managed to hold onto power for 12 years after the revolution. In this essay, I will be looking at how he governed Russia in the first 9 of these years, leading up to just before the world war. I will also be studying whether these ways of governing are 'carrots or sticks'. The Russian people had demanded a parliament in the revolution, and the Tsar gave them one. This was called a Duma, had very little power, could not pass laws, and was headed by a brutal Prime minister called Peter Stolypin. ...read more.

Middle

It just made their meek little lives even fuller of worry and fear. Next, Stolypin's land reform was put in place. This was good for the richer peasants as it enabled them to buy other peasants land, with the help of loans from a peasant's bank. However, for the poorer peasants whose land was bought, this reform left them as wanderers, travelling around the countryside looking for work. Some went to Siberia, after being promised a new home by the government, but when they got there, all they found was wasteland, all the good land had been bought by richer nobles. The next method the Tsar used to govern Russia was also a stick. The Okhrana, who were the secret police, infiltrated people's lives. ...read more.

Conclusion

The October manifesto of 1905 was a rotten carrot. It promised the peasants and urban workers all that they had asked for. A parliament, shorter working hours and higher wages. The parliament however, had next to no power, and the higher wages and shorter days were short lived. By December, all the troops were back in Russia, having signed a peace treaty with Japan, and the Tsar soon put them to work crushing the people back down, lengthening hours and lowering wages. The carrot had turned rotten before the people had even had a proper bite. Overall, I believe that the Tsar used more malicious ways of governing Russia than nice ones. I believe that had he been slightly kinder to his subjects, then he could probably have stayed in power for longer. ?? ?? ?? ?? Document1 18/09/11 08:00hrs Name (House) Year ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The First World War

    May be, Rasputin could be able to make Nikolay II take more radical measures than Duma dissolve but he was killed on 17 December 1916 in Yusupovs' palace in Petrograd. The Rasputin's murder not only freed bourgeoisie from the main competitor but unfortunately demonstrated the people that terrorist acts and

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    In Moscow, mainly because of the mistakes of the local Bolsheviks, who did not act with sufficient energy, the counter-revolutionary Junkers initially went onto the offensive and carried out a massacre. Despite this, incredibly, they were allowed to go free on giving their word that they would not participate in any further violent acts against the Soviet power.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Source 3 however claims that all of the family were shot in Ipatiev house, and then after the murder a lorry took mine them to the Four Brothers mine. Here they were cut up, and then burnt using sulphuric acid and petrol.

  2. Stalin Souurces Questions

    Now if we look at source B we see Stalin once again, but this time it seems to be in a more positive atmosphere. The cartoon is an official Soviet painting so is bound to bias for the communist party and it was published in the 1930's also.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work