• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the Tsar survive in 1905?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did the Tsar survive in 1905? Up to the end of the 19th century, Russia was an autocratic country. It was ruled by an autocratic Tsar. He ruled, as he liked. His will was the sole source of law, of taxation and justice. He controlled the army and all the officials. Through his special position on the Holy Synod, he controlled even religious affairs. The privileged nobles, who possessed land and serfs, and held all the chief offices in the Tsar's administration, supported his autocratic rule. The mass of people was serfs. Serfs were 'slaves'. They worked on the estates of the nobles. The nobles could punish them in any form. The nobles could even sell them as chattels. Besides the serfs, there was a very small middle class in the towns. They were discontented with the backwardness of Russia. The main theme of the Russian history in the 19th century is that the non-noble classes asked for an improvement in their wretched and poor conditions of life. ...read more.

Middle

However, despite its efforts it backfired violently and pushed more reason for a revolution. An Orthodox priest Father Gapon had been acting as a police agent in charge of one of these groups, The Assembly of Russian Factory Workers, when news of the failure at Port Arthur provoked widespread unrest in St Petersburg. He organized a petition to the Tsar demanding an elected assembly, minimum wage and the abolition of redemption repayments and led a march on the winter palace to air his criticism. More than 15,000 people, who at the arrival met police and soldiers who tried to push them away. Doing so they failed and panicked, resulting in them opening fire on the protesters, killing several hundred people. Although Nicholas was not at the palace, it was widely believed that it was the Tsar who had given the order to open fire on the demonstrators. This totally alienated the crowd from the crown. The government remained confident and determined, as any sign of weakness would encourage the opposition to keep fighting. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite there failure against the way with Japan, it gave the Tsar more influence amongst the people. In my opinion, the Tsar survived the revolution because despite a few naval incidents the army remained loyal enough to support him throughout and to crush his opposition. What seems to be clear is that the ability of the Tsar and his government to ride out the problems of 1905 was, in spirit, their pulling themselves together and effectively dealing with the situation in hand. Concessions were made where they were needed, none of which seriously damaged or altered the Tsar's power, and force stepped in where political pacification did not placate. The government acted effectively in the face of combining external issues, dealt with them to the extent of sending most of the general population back to work and away from governmental necks (despite a few assassinations), and, while perhaps not emerging unscathed, emerged nonetheless. The revolution, if that is what it truly was, was a rebellion driven by displeasure with living-not discontent directed squarely at the government in and of itself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    All the different revolutionary groups' frustration and keenness of rebellion was recognized between one another, but it was not united. It is stressed that the key constituent to this revolution was the instability of economical progress such as peasants losing their land and having bad working conditions; not the political regime.

  2. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    They regularly suffered famines. Also the Russian population rose by nearly 50% in the previous 60 years which meant that the peasant population was also increasing which was putting more pressure on the land.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The task became "catch up with Europe and America". This was very far from the "lowest stage of communism" envisaged by Marx. The Bolsheviks were forced to tackle economic and cultural problems that had long ago been solved in the West. Lenin once declared that socialism was "Soviet power plus electrification" to illustrate the basic task at hand.

  2. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    refused, the guards fired upon the peaceful protesters, resulting in the death of hundreds, and the wounding and trampling of thousands of people. These, in turn, sparked an endless number of proletarian strikes, peasant uprisings and seizures of land, mutinies in the army and the navy as well as further

  1. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    he had once beheld was now shattered and although he was not at the St Petersburg Palace on bloody Sunday people still believed it to be him that had ordered the guards to fire at the innocent people. These events caused political activity to grow dramatically.

  2. How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution?

    This left all the other classes who were displeased with the leadership of the Tsar and how he was ruling their country. The concessions did calm much of this unrest among his people, but only for a short period of time.

  1. How did the Tsar survive the 1905 Revolution?

    It was not the revolutionaries who were driving (or even riding out) the events. The concept of "the opposition", therefore, was not a list of names or groups. So-called "Bloody Sunday", the "massacre" at the Winter Palace, was the trigger to what Michael Lynch calls "a nationwide outbreak of disorder".

  2. How Did Tsar Nicholas 2nd Survive The 1905 Revolution

    This can be applied to the resistance that the tsar faced. Just because there was no coherence between the opposing political parties it is not to say that there was no attempt to reform. A general strike did take place in St.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work