• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the Tsar survive in 1905?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did the Tsar survive in 1905? Up to the end of the 19th century, Russia was an autocratic country. It was ruled by an autocratic Tsar. He ruled, as he liked. His will was the sole source of law, of taxation and justice. He controlled the army and all the officials. Through his special position on the Holy Synod, he controlled even religious affairs. The privileged nobles, who possessed land and serfs, and held all the chief offices in the Tsar's administration, supported his autocratic rule. The mass of people was serfs. Serfs were 'slaves'. They worked on the estates of the nobles. The nobles could punish them in any form. The nobles could even sell them as chattels. Besides the serfs, there was a very small middle class in the towns. They were discontented with the backwardness of Russia. The main theme of the Russian history in the 19th century is that the non-noble classes asked for an improvement in their wretched and poor conditions of life. ...read more.

Middle

However, despite its efforts it backfired violently and pushed more reason for a revolution. An Orthodox priest Father Gapon had been acting as a police agent in charge of one of these groups, The Assembly of Russian Factory Workers, when news of the failure at Port Arthur provoked widespread unrest in St Petersburg. He organized a petition to the Tsar demanding an elected assembly, minimum wage and the abolition of redemption repayments and led a march on the winter palace to air his criticism. More than 15,000 people, who at the arrival met police and soldiers who tried to push them away. Doing so they failed and panicked, resulting in them opening fire on the protesters, killing several hundred people. Although Nicholas was not at the palace, it was widely believed that it was the Tsar who had given the order to open fire on the demonstrators. This totally alienated the crowd from the crown. The government remained confident and determined, as any sign of weakness would encourage the opposition to keep fighting. ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite there failure against the way with Japan, it gave the Tsar more influence amongst the people. In my opinion, the Tsar survived the revolution because despite a few naval incidents the army remained loyal enough to support him throughout and to crush his opposition. What seems to be clear is that the ability of the Tsar and his government to ride out the problems of 1905 was, in spirit, their pulling themselves together and effectively dealing with the situation in hand. Concessions were made where they were needed, none of which seriously damaged or altered the Tsar's power, and force stepped in where political pacification did not placate. The government acted effectively in the face of combining external issues, dealt with them to the extent of sending most of the general population back to work and away from governmental necks (despite a few assassinations), and, while perhaps not emerging unscathed, emerged nonetheless. The revolution, if that is what it truly was, was a rebellion driven by displeasure with living-not discontent directed squarely at the government in and of itself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    All the different revolutionary groups' frustration and keenness of rebellion was recognized between one another, but it was not united. It is stressed that the key constituent to this revolution was the instability of economical progress such as peasants losing their land and having bad working conditions; not the political regime.

  2. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    Witte guessed correctly that enough Liberals would accept the manifesto to cause a split in the party and weaken their resistance. He was right. Guchkov led the moderate Liberals to form the Octobrists, who accepted the manifesto while the more resolute Milyukov remained unconvinced and led the Kadets instead.

  1. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    They regularly suffered famines. Also the Russian population rose by nearly 50% in the previous 60 years which meant that the peasant population was also increasing which was putting more pressure on the land.

  2. How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution?

    The army was the biggest priority for the Tsar to sort out I feel because the army were his ruling force. In an autocracy such as Russia's at the time, the army is what the tsar used to enforce his laws around the empire and without his army he would have a very difficult time staying in power.

  1. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    army and navy and continued oppositions to the Tsars system meant that we have arrived at the revolution of 1905. Before all of this tragedy the peasants had had a great deal of respect for the Tsar but after the bloody Sunday incident feelings changed and the father like image

  2. How Did Tsar Nicholas 2nd Survive The 1905 Revolution

    This can be applied to the resistance that the tsar faced. Just because there was no coherence between the opposing political parties it is not to say that there was no attempt to reform. A general strike did take place in St.

  1. How did the Tsar survive Politically in 1905?

    They also believed in the traditional Marxist view that the proletarian revolution had to occur after the bourgeois revolution but knew that the bourgeois revolution was not well enough developed to lead a successful revolution. This party was lead partly by Leon Trotsky.

  2. The Fall of the Tsar

    While it is not reliable, it does not disprove either of the sources. As it doesn't actually tell us that much about Rasputin, there isn't as much to disprove, but it still agrees about the womanising Rasputin seems to have, perhaps the Tsarina is just one of these women.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work