• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution?

Extracts from this document...


How Did The Tsar Survive The 1905 Revolution? The 1905 revolution was a dangerous time for the Tsar of Russia at the time, Nicholas II. There was much unrest among the Russian people during the early years of the 20th century and many revolutionary groups were beginning to emerge as an immediate threat to the Tsar and his regime. The tsar had been the unquestioned autocratic leader in Russia for generations but the Russian people where getting tired of this way of governing one of the largest empires. They felt that they were beginning to become outdated in their ways compared to the western civilisations of Europe who had all now become democratic. Many people believed that in order for Russia to remain a strong country than a democratic system was needed to keep the provinces of Russia under control. Nicholas II however, felt that their was no need for change and had grown up under the tutor of Konstantin Pobedonastev who had taught the Tsar from a young age that the autocratic system was the best and that it should remain intact at all costs. Because of this talk of revolt became rife among many of the Russian people and the Tsar issued concessions in order to save his power as best he could. ...read more.


Unlike during the revolution of 1917, the opposition were not one big group and worked more or less against each other instead of joining powers and uniting against the Tsar. In this effect, if the opposition had have become more organised I think that the Tsar would indeed have been overturned in 1905 but the opposition did not organise themselves in the proper way and so the Tsar had the upper hand. When the tsar issued the concessions in the October Manifesto, all the social groups thought that this was their chance to make a difference and so they all had their own agendas. These did not all go together and so much of the Duma, which the Tsar had set up, was groups arguing over things and actually rarely getting things done. This could have been sheer luck for the Tsar or he might have planned it to go this way as he knew that the groups would not have got along or agreed on matters. Nevertheless this was a good move on the Tsars hand and once again he had the upper hand. Many of the motives that were passed in the Duma were also far more economical than they were political. This meant that in actual fact the tsar still held a lot of power. ...read more.


In the space of those 11 years many things were done to try and keep the unrest of the people at bay but it was "Too little, too late". The revolution of 1905 wasn't really a revolution at all but was more of an uprising against the system of leadership at the time and the term revolution suggests that the system is totally turned around and a new governing body is brought in. this however was not the case in Russia. After this so called revolution the Tsar still held most of his powers he did before the revolution and so it in fact did nothing to take away any of his powers. All the concessions did was to grant the people the right to a duma and the freedom of speech and meeting for political parties. But the Tsar watered down the Duma so much that no one voter really had much effect in the way the country was run and if the Tsar didn't like what the duma was doing than he had the power to dissolve it at his own will. The people that did eventually make it to the Duma found that it was mostly run and controlled by the nobility. This eventually led to the unrest of the people emerging again in the years leading to and during the war and an eventual revolution. Nigel Caunt 12:3 Tuesday 14th October 2 Nigel Caunt 12:3 Tuesday 14th October ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Several sections in the Russian society were created and became involved in revolution. When the industrial workers began to go on strike causing the factories to close down and somewhat 'paralyse' the economy and performance of the country; the newly formed Soviets were now recognised as the new government.

  2. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    The Russian people had given up a lot for this war. The railway system was used to keep the army supplied in the Far East. So in the cities the lack of transport led to food shortages and price rises.

  1. How did the Tsar survive in 1905?

    Another incident, which provoked the need for revolution, was 'Bloody Sunday'. Moscow's chief police Colonel Zubatov had organized a brave campaign experiment by encouraging moderate workers groups to campaign for better wages and working conditions in an effort to distract them from terrorism and revolution.

  2. How and why did the Tsarist regime survive the 1905 revolution?

    So they decided to continue the revolution. But now they were considerably weaker because they had been split up, so it was much easier, for the Tsar, to suppress their disturbances. In April 1906 The Tsar replaced Witte with Stolypin, and he used police and law courts against agitators.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917 revolution?

    These led to the Tsar losing his trust again. One major problem for the Tsar was himself. One of the reasons he survived the 1905 revolution was by accepting the October manifesto. When he broke the promise he proved that he couldn't be trusted and lost the loyalty of the peasants.

  2. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    This clearly outlines Russian incompetence, it also took a year for "Russians in Manchuria to attain the same strength as the Japanese"2 due to a hole in the middle of the Trans-Siberian railway.

  1. Why Did Tsar Nicholas Abdicate Following the 1917 Revolution but not the 1905 Revolution?

    In 1905 Tsar Nicholas managed to control the situation and stop the revolution. He did this mainly by being able to split the opposition. Riots broke out in the major cities and Tsar Nicholas firstly tried to use force, but this only angered peaceful demonstrators.

  2. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    After the defeat they demanded wage rises, formation of trade unions and that certain laws were to be abolished. These demands led to people joining together for their cause and on Oct 22nd 1905 thousands of industrial workers, people of all ages marched to the Tsars palace in St Petersburg.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work