• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Did Tsar Nicholas 2nd Survive The 1905 Revolution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Did Tsar Nicholas 2nd Survive The 1905 Revolution? There are several factors that help our understanding of how the tsar and his regime endured the turmoil of the 1905 revolution. However, one thing is for sure, after the uprising and swift, brutal suppression of the revolutionaries on the 22nd of January 1905 outside the gates of the Winter Palace, the Nicholas 2nd and his administration received a drastic wake up call. Even though the monarchy received a hard slap on this day, the tsar himself was in no immediate danger; the ignorance of the instigator, Father Gapon, ensured that he didn't even know that the tsar was not occupying the Palace at this time. There is much debate as to whether or not the events of 1905 constituted a revolution at all. Leon Trotsky, a famous and influential revolutionary writer stated that it was merely a 'dress rehearsal' for 1917, and he is not without support. The impact that it had was minimal compared to any other of history's great political upheavals. Many Marxist historians believe that 1905 only worsened matters, making full a scale revolt inevitable and simply acting as a stepping-stone to Lenin's seizure of power. ...read more.

Middle

he made sure that he retained control of the naval and military forces. It is not true that every soldier and naval recruit stayed devoted to their god chosen tsar; in June of 1905 the crew of the Battle Ship Prince Potemkin mutinied and slit the throats of all the officers on board, and as a further sign of protest sailed the ship out of Russian waters. This was one of the only recorded cases of mutiny in the ranks, but as Witte said while commenting on the troops return from the Far East, 'if they join the revolution, then everything will collapse'. It would have been understandable if the army had decided to turn on its commander in chief, as the failure of the upper ranks to devise suitable tactics was pitiful. The decision to travel into Asian waters with the entire Baltic fleet cost 12,600 Russian lives alone, with a further 85,000 perishing in the Battle Of Mukden when Commander Stoessel sacrificed impregnable defensive ground. It was not only the support of the armed forces that the last tsar relied upon; it was also the patronage of the police forces and his secret political police, the Okhranka. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Manifesto itself included concessions on; Freedom of speech, freedom of assembly (the volatility of the situation meant anti-liberal views were already relaxed within government), freedom of the press and a promise to incorporate a bicameral legislative parliament in 1906. Struve and Miliukov (the respective heads of the liberal parties) accepted this constitution of behalf of the workers, deciding to with hold any criticism for the time it was released in case it did not live up to the standards promised. For the liberals this was a huge step towards a more democratic nation, and in theory it held all the answers to their many problems, but in reality it was an intelligent ploy on Witte's behalf to split the opposition, rendering it useless. The more militant wings were now isolated leaving a substantial number of opponents in want of peace. It is something I have already mentioned, but there is always strength in numbers, and separating the antagonists was vital for autocratic survival. A third Duma was also established, incorporating the classes that previously were exempt from voting. They also had supposed power over law passing; just as our house of lords did at this time, the Duma had the power to veto laws that would otherwise be passed. Every law had to be run through them before they were approved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Middle classes and the peasants also joined due to their shock from Bloody Sunday. Other revolutionary groups were introduced such as the S.R's, the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. This was exceptionally dangerous for the Tsar, as there were alternative forms of government being created.

  2. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    refused, the guards fired upon the peaceful protesters, resulting in the death of hundreds, and the wounding and trampling of thousands of people. These, in turn, sparked an endless number of proletarian strikes, peasant uprisings and seizures of land, mutinies in the army and the navy as well as further

  1. Was a 2nd revolution necessary in Russia in 1917?

    Many of the garrison troops sympathized with the workers and joined the strikes instead of stopping the riots. The revolutionary situation in Russia was the consequence of the inefficiency of Tsarist rule and three years of endless defeats in war.

  2. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    down out, throwing them off the roof tops on to the streets to the cheers of the

  1. How and why did the Tsarist regime survive the 1905 revolution?

    men, women and children led by a priest and a union leader in the name of Father Gapon. They marched towards the Tsar's palace in St. Petersburg, carrying to peacefully present to him a petition that requested from him the improvement of living conditions, and more freedom of expression.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917 revolution?

    These led to the Tsar losing his trust again. One major problem for the Tsar was himself. One of the reasons he survived the 1905 revolution was by accepting the October manifesto. When he broke the promise he proved that he couldn't be trusted and lost the loyalty of the peasants.

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    'In England in 1873, for example, four fifths of the acreage was the property of fewer than 700 persons; in 1895, only 14 percent of land cultivated was tilled by it owners' conversely in '1916 peasant cultivators in European Russia owned nine tenths of arable land.

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    sight of a revolution in Russia could give revolutionary groups still alive in France ideas which means people could be scared of another wave of attempts to over throw the government. The author of this painting could have also been part of a revolutionary group in France and was painted

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work