• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How do Roman fish sauces compare with sauces today?

Extracts from this document...


How do Roman fish sauces compare with sauces today? "The so-called liquamen is made as follows: the entrails of fish are thrown into a vessel and salted. Take small fish, either atherinae, or small red mullet, or sprats, or anchovy, or any other small fish, and salt all this together and leave to dry in the sun, shaking it frequently. When it has become dry from the heat extract the garum from it as follows: take a long fine-meshed basket and place it in the middle of the vessel with the above mentioned fish, and in this way the so-called liquamen, put through the basket, can be taken up. The residue is allec. The Bithynians make it in the following manner: it is best to take large or small sprats, or, failing them, take anchovies, or horse-mackerel, or mackerel, make mixture of all and put this in a baking-trough. Take two pints of salt to the peck of the fish and mix well to have the fish impregnated with salt. Leave it for one night, then put it in an earthenware vessel which you place in the open sun for 2-3 months, stirring with a stick at intervals, then take it, cover it with a lid and store it away. ...read more.


Which sauce is best is a matter of opinion, rather than fact, so, in my opinion, the source is still reliable. Liquamen is used in almost all the recipes of Apicius (q.v.), often in lieu of salt, which is recommended as a substitute. Whilst liquamen would have been extremely salty this is probably for hygiene rather than culinary reasons. Salt is added to nam pla and nuoc mam to prevent the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Given the similarity of use between these sauces and liquamen it is reasonable to extrapolate that salt was added for the same reason. Even with the high salinity, certain bacteria would have been able to breed. Lactobacilli, a culture used in yoghurts today, would produce lactic acid, giving a flavour somewhat similar to sauerkraut or dill pickles. Coupled with the fish flavour this provides sufficient evidence, I think, to show that liquamen was a sauce in its own right, not just an interesting or healthier (the fish oil contains a lot of vitamins and minerals, much like cod liver oil today) alternative to salt. As well as the standard fish sauces, garum and allec, the Romans diluted garum, with various liquids, to produce new sauces with different flavours. ...read more.


Apicius' fried veal, a very similar dish, both contain the same basic ingredients, is served with a liquamen-based sauce. Vegetables, seafood, meat, poultry and eggs are all served with some use of soy sauce or liquamen. Their use is almost identical. This evidence, however, may be misleading. Whilst soy sauce, without doubt, is an integral part of Oriental cookery, Apicius' cookbook may be a poor source concerning everyday food. Garum is, certainly, an important aspect of the cooking Apicius was used to but it is important to remember that he was a millionaire, a wealthy Roman who, reputedly, committed suicide upon discovering he had spent all his money on food. Apicius' lifestyle is quite clearly that of the Roman uppermost classes and his cookbook is not representative of the food of the typical Roman. Garum could well have been an expensive condiment; there is evidence that suggests this: "Scarcely any other liquid except unguents has come to be more highly valued, bringing fame even to the nations that make it." - Pliny Natural History Book XXXI Chapter XLIII Apicius' extensive use of it could be misrepresentative of its true niche within Roman cookery, representing a luxury only available to the richest of Roman society as vital to Roman cuisine. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What is the Evidence for the Roman Occupation of the Antonine Wall?

    On Hadrian's Wall the vallum was filled in every forty-one metres to form causeways and gates were removed from the milecastles to allow free access across the old military zone. Archeological evidence also points to change in habitation patterns in the eastern lowlands.

  2. Titus Salt and Saltaire.

    For example, he could sack a worker simply because he could. Titus had enough money already, even if he didn't make a model village. He didn't need it; maybe he thought that this village would be something to remember him by when he dies.

  1. The Royal Pavilion

    Brighton had something of a reputation for its large amount gambling, drinking and prostitution. Brighthelmstone was the place where people cam to have fun and escape from the normalities of everyday life, there you could do and get almost anything.

  2. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    This makes the workforce in the Jewellery Quarter unusual, as it employs a lot of people whereas other places use machines to do the work and only a few people to operate them. In the Jewellery Quarter, however, most of the work is done by hand; therefore more people need

  1. swansea and the Blits version 2

    Source 2 show a pictorial evidence of women in informs, meaning that because men had all gone into war women had to take on the roles of working in factories, shops and so on. Many women were young and they wanted to take an individual role to show how dedicated they are to there work and what they do.

  2. Did the Roman invasion of Britain happen in Sussex or Richborough in Kent as ...

    The answer being that the South coast would have been owned by the Atrebate tribe, and so would not be hostile towards the Romans, giving them a friendly territory to land on. If they were after a surprise attack they would be more likely to succeed by landing on friendly territory, as this would give them time to prepare.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work