• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How do these sources show why O'Connor, "unquestionably the best loved, as well as the most hated man in the Chartist movement", become its leader?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kate McPherson (917 words) How do these sources show why O'Connor, "unquestionably the best loved, as well as the most hated man in the Chartist movement", become its leader? O'Connor is seen to be the most loved man in the Chartist movement. Harney speaks of him as having a strong physical frame, a loud voice which is seen as important reasons as to why he's the natural leader of Chartism. He's acknowledging that O'Connor is not perfect but he has all the qualities that a leader should hold. They are supported by the cartoon from the middle class magazine Punch (in source 4), which whilst ridiculing O'Connor, emphasises his heroic, muscular figure. In source 2, Gammage - who is an enemy of O'Connor - echoes what Harney believes by describing him as being "stout and athletic". Gammage is being intellectual by admitting this as he doesn't normally compliment O'Connor because of his dislike for the man. The source is very qualified and also clear why Gammage thinks he was successful and popular. ...read more.

Middle

He said this because O'Connor was editor of the Northern Star so therefore had access to change what was said about him. He says O'Connor was only popular as he did not tell the truth and that his actions in the paper were to achieve "absurd and mischievous popularity". Francis Place was against Socialist ideas and therefore persisted with his hatred for O'Connor for a long time along side with Gammage, who were both supporters of the 'peaceful' Chartist William Lovett who had believed in Moral Force. Dorothy Thompson disagrees with Francis Place, by saying that even though he was the editor, he gave all views which made it unbiased. She supports Harney in source 1 when he says "...he never interferes with what I write in the paper nor does he know what I write until he sees the paper". Gammage didn't want O'Connor to be leader, as he thought "Vincent by far was his superior" (source 2). He did not believe he was appropriate to lead the movement and felt there were others which were better suited. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gammage and the Punch cartoon show agreement. The fact that Gammage, who as a supporter of Lovett and loathed O'Connor and the middle class publication who feared and dismissed the Chartists, emphasise the importance of O'Connor's appearance and abilities. Harney is obviously biased as a friend of O'Connor but he was an experienced revolutionary so his judgement is valid. Harney knows the English don't want a violent continental revolution and acknowledges O'Connor's intelligent understanding is not offering this to the Chartists. His assessment of O'Connor's intelligence therefore indicates the importance in O'Connor's leadership. Gammage perceives O'Connor's intellectual ability, but judges O'Connor as "erratic". This is unsurprising. Gammage knows of O'Connor's later mental ill health and the failure of the Land Plan when he writes in 1856. The five sources give the evidence needed to understand why he did become the leader and even his own enemies such as Gammage and Francis Place had to admit he appeared strong even if he wasn't their first choice of leader. It also shows that another favourite candidate for the Chartist leader - Harney, a revolutionary - admitted himself that O'Connor was more appropriate as he was in favour of violence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    All three sources are similar in a way that all of them involve Stalin in some way associated with the Russian people. Also, all of them have some truth in them. They are all very different as each one shows a different aspect of Stalin and how he dealt with Russian people while he was in power.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Propaganda encouraged the workers to put aside their unhappiness and use their goodwill to the governments need. Source B portrays Stalin in a very positive light, liked by workers dressed in military clothing but its is white rather then green this gives the impression of purity cleanliness, discipline and removes

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Mounting economic success was mirrored in political advances, with agreements being reached with both the United Kingdom and Portugal for the return of Hong Kong and Macau to Chinese Sovereignty in 1997 and 1999 respectively. The dates for drawing lines under European intervention in China and its legacy were timetabled.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    inspirational and charismatic leader that led Russia out of the depths of despair to its current superpower status. Question 4 Sources G and H are both extracts from a speech made by Krushchev, who was addressing the Soviet Communist party in 1956.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Stalin finishes by comparing "our leaders" to those men he met in Siberia. Stalin probably wrote this source so people reading it would think of him as caring and compassionate and to make the people he refers to as "our leaders" as heartless people.

  2. Stalin- Man or Monster?

    The hydroelectric station portrays a true image of the industralistion that was going on due to the five yea plans. However, the majority of workers were not happy as they had poor wages, long hours, and hardly any type of social life.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    It shows him to be a caring man who was congratulating the wives of his army officers. It shows him to be admired, even idolized by his people. This does show some Russians view of Stalin. . However many opposed Stalin and his policies.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster

    By the late 1930�s many Soviet workers had improved their conditions by gaining well-paid skilled jobs and earning bonuses for meeting targets. There was an almost non-existent unemployment rate. Stalin also encouraged woman to work by setting up childcare services; four out of five new workers recruited between 1932 and 1937 were women.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work