• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective a leader was Martin Luther King in the Civil Rights campaign?

Extracts from this document...


How effective a leader was Martin Luther King in the Civil Rights campaign? Martin Luther King was extremely Pacifist in leading the Civil rights campaign. He was devoted Christian, and a family man. His Idea of protest in the civil rights campaign was quite simple, to use peaceful, non-violent methods to try gain social equality for blacks. He was the leader of the SCLC, (southern Christian leadership conference). His protest were mainly based in the south of America, where there was more Social and Political problems compared to the north. Martin Luther King was a Baptist minister in the town of Montgomery in the year of 1956. This would be the starting point of Kings leadership to civil rights campaign. In 1956, a woman, Rosa Parks, refused to leave her seat on a bus for a white person. This in effect started the 'Montgomery bus boycott'. At first, King did not lead the boycott; he was approached by the NAACP to keep the protest peaceful, as King was involved in the local church. ...read more.


In Albany 1961, King again had been 'invited' rather than produced the Albany campaign. The campaign was to challenge Segregation laws in Albany. The campaign was a disaster, and once more discredited the role of King in the Civil rights campaign. In addition, King's reputation and leadership qualities could not unite the 3 movements, SCLC, SNCC and the NAACP and this contributed to the failure. However, King had learnt a valuable lesson in Albany. The SCLC needed a big victory in the civil rights campaign. Other organisation had overshadowed the reputation of King and the SCLC. King's leadership role in leading non-violent campaign was also in doubt. In Birmingham 1963, King's leadership showed a great success. He learnt, in previous campaigns, that the role of the media, and media coverage was crucial. In Birmingham he exploited the media coverage in showing how blacks were being treated in the south. Blacks being harassed by dogs, and being hosed upon brought national attention to the civil rights problem. Birmingham was a great success as it contributed in the civil rights legislations. ...read more.


Young blacks in the north thought of King as being too peaceful and not radical enough. In conclusion, I think Kings effectiveness in the civil rights campaign was quite significant. Firstly we must understand that before King, there was no real leader in the Civil rights campaign. Therefore, him campaigning and bringing attention to the Civil rights issue, was a success in it self. However, at times it could be argued that King leadership was not really great because he had not seized the moment, especially after Montgomery. King was quite effective in bringing change in parts of the south, the first of that Montgomery, where he showed how his peaceful, non-violent methods were effective. Although his later success which involved Birmingham was in some ways violent, King's role in Birmingham was always to encourage non-violence and peace, which contributed in the success. King effectiveness in the north can be debated, however, King was more of campaigner in Social change rather than economical. King non-violent campaign was clearly effective because it did bring change in America. As a leader King was very effective in the Civil rights campaign because he brought attention to the problem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Do you think Martin Luther King deserves his reputation for being a great leader ...

    It would certainly be fair to say that, without King, the Civil rights act would, at least been delayed considerably in its passing. King's personal key to a successful protest was keeping it peaceful and non-violent. This had mixed success and brought King under a lot of criticism, some claiming

  2. What role did Martin Luther Kings play in the Montgomery bus boycott?

    Some even go as far to say that he was jealous of other black leaders. The fact that King had at first been reluctant to take up the post of head of the MIA also strengthens the viewpoint that he was lead, rather than being a leader himself.

  1. Why did a campaign for civil rights emerge in the 1950s? The civil rights ...

    had on the civil rights movement do appear to have outweighed the negative. Indeed, few would disagree with the statement that World War II brought about 'revolutionary changes that would eventually lead to a black campaign for racial justice' (Sitkoff, 1981, p.13).

  2. Martin Luther King Jr.

    education qualifications and they experienced negative periods in education, a good example would be Bill Gates who was a Harvard University dropout and Richard Branson who has little to no educational background before becoming successful. My view on the argument is that to become successful you need an educational background

  1. Martin Luther King.

    they used bombs to frighten the blacks off: they burnt down black churches, schools and hospitals. In 1955, a bomb was thrown into the house of Martin Luther King who wrote about this incident in his book "Stride towards Freedom": I walked out to the porch and asked the crowd to come to order.

  2. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King: Compared and Contrasted.

    This was a contributing factor to why he changed his faith from the Christian religion to the Muslim religion as many white supremacist groups were based in Christian communities. Up to a point both King and Malcolm X seem to have been brought up on the same set of standards,

  1. How significant was Martin Luther King Jnr to the success of the Montgomery Bus ...

    Nixon, Ralph Abernathy, H. Hubbard and A. West that the Montgomery improvement Association was formed, this was not something that MLK did alone, there was much help from others. Furthermore the boycott would not have been nearly as successful if only MLK, had persevered.

  2. History Civil Rights Coursework Sources Questions

    Martin Luther King used peace to show who was really in the wrong, even if a white used violence on him, he would not retaliate, whereas Malcolm X would retaliate. This made people fear Malcolm X, and this gave respect for black people as a whole.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work