• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective a leader was Martin Luther King in the Civil Rights campaign?

Extracts from this document...


How effective a leader was Martin Luther King in the Civil Rights campaign? Martin Luther King was extremely Pacifist in leading the Civil rights campaign. He was devoted Christian, and a family man. His Idea of protest in the civil rights campaign was quite simple, to use peaceful, non-violent methods to try gain social equality for blacks. He was the leader of the SCLC, (southern Christian leadership conference). His protest were mainly based in the south of America, where there was more Social and Political problems compared to the north. Martin Luther King was a Baptist minister in the town of Montgomery in the year of 1956. This would be the starting point of Kings leadership to civil rights campaign. In 1956, a woman, Rosa Parks, refused to leave her seat on a bus for a white person. This in effect started the 'Montgomery bus boycott'. At first, King did not lead the boycott; he was approached by the NAACP to keep the protest peaceful, as King was involved in the local church. ...read more.


In Albany 1961, King again had been 'invited' rather than produced the Albany campaign. The campaign was to challenge Segregation laws in Albany. The campaign was a disaster, and once more discredited the role of King in the Civil rights campaign. In addition, King's reputation and leadership qualities could not unite the 3 movements, SCLC, SNCC and the NAACP and this contributed to the failure. However, King had learnt a valuable lesson in Albany. The SCLC needed a big victory in the civil rights campaign. Other organisation had overshadowed the reputation of King and the SCLC. King's leadership role in leading non-violent campaign was also in doubt. In Birmingham 1963, King's leadership showed a great success. He learnt, in previous campaigns, that the role of the media, and media coverage was crucial. In Birmingham he exploited the media coverage in showing how blacks were being treated in the south. Blacks being harassed by dogs, and being hosed upon brought national attention to the civil rights problem. Birmingham was a great success as it contributed in the civil rights legislations. ...read more.


Young blacks in the north thought of King as being too peaceful and not radical enough. In conclusion, I think Kings effectiveness in the civil rights campaign was quite significant. Firstly we must understand that before King, there was no real leader in the Civil rights campaign. Therefore, him campaigning and bringing attention to the Civil rights issue, was a success in it self. However, at times it could be argued that King leadership was not really great because he had not seized the moment, especially after Montgomery. King was quite effective in bringing change in parts of the south, the first of that Montgomery, where he showed how his peaceful, non-violent methods were effective. Although his later success which involved Birmingham was in some ways violent, King's role in Birmingham was always to encourage non-violence and peace, which contributed in the success. King effectiveness in the north can be debated, however, King was more of campaigner in Social change rather than economical. King non-violent campaign was clearly effective because it did bring change in America. As a leader King was very effective in the Civil rights campaign because he brought attention to the problem. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King: Compared and Contrasted.

    talking to a man who had just overthrown a despot and had replaced him with a communist regime. This certainly highlights the difference between X and King. The fact that X was willing to go to such lengths to get his view across and actually make an impact shows his

  2. Martin Luther King Jr.

    or in the case of successful entrepreneurs like Bill Gates or Richard Branson. Personally, I think I would find it difficult to make the same transition impact as King, Gates or Branson, my transition and passage of change will be minimal in comparison.

  1. What role did Martin Luther Kings play in the Montgomery bus boycott?

    Some even go as far to say that he was jealous of other black leaders. The fact that King had at first been reluctant to take up the post of head of the MIA also strengthens the viewpoint that he was lead, rather than being a leader himself.

  2. Do you think Martin Luther King deserves his reputation for being a great leader ...

    It would certainly be fair to say that, without King, the Civil rights act would, at least been delayed considerably in its passing. King's personal key to a successful protest was keeping it peaceful and non-violent. This had mixed success and brought King under a lot of criticism, some claiming

  1. Black civil rights

    In these few paragraphs I will describe these successes in profound detail.

  2. Why did a campaign for civil rights emerge in the 1950s? The civil rights ...

    issued judgements favourable to civil rights in education, transport, electoral law, legal representation and housing. Nevertheless, regardless of the numerous occasions on which there had been rulings by the Supreme Court which would, at first glance, appear to be advancing the cause for African Americans, these rulings failed to provoke

  1. Why did some black activists reject the approach of Martin Luther King to Civil ...

    whites by allowing them to beat Blacks; they believed the whites were winning the fight since there was slow change in black peoples' lives. Although King had achieved a lot in the South, such as changes in the law regarding civil rights, there were still many problems which he was helpless against in the North.

  2. The importance of Lyndon Johnson in bringing about Civil Rights.

    president, instead making the evacuation of American troops from Vietnam his number one priority. Nixon did, however, strengthen some of the laws his predecessors had put in place. Nixon dismantled the dual-school system, which for a long time had been a symbol of racial inequality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work