• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was the League of Nations in maintaining peace?

Free essay example:

How effective was the League of Nations in maintaining peace?

After the First World War, Woodrow Wilson supported the establishment of a peace-keeping organization. Under his influence, the League of Nations was founded in 1920. However, it failed to keep peace efficiently.

The League of Nations could only solve the disputes amongst small nations. In 1920, it settled a dispute between Finland and Sweden over the Aaland Islands. It also settled the boundary problems between Poland and Germany. It stopped Greece from attacking Bulgaria. By sending a commission of representatives from various powers to the Albanian region, the league successfully settled the dispute between Yugoslavia and Albania.

In the first decade after the First World War, the League of Nations did work well in keeping peace. However, after the Great Depression, the League of Nations did nothing to stop the aggression from ambitious powers. In the 1930s, it could not stopped the Japanese invasion of Manchuria, the Italian expansion in Abyssinia (1936) and Albania (1938), the German expansion in Austria, and the Sudetenland (1938), Czechoslovakia and Poland (1939), the Soviet expansion in Poland, Baltic states, and Finland (1939). The League of Nations could do nothing to prevent Hitler’s violation of the Versailles Treaty, like the remilitarization of Rhineland in 1936, and the League also could not cease the intervention of Italy, Germany and the Soviet Union in the Spanish Civil War. Hence, the League of Nations did very little to maintain peace in this period.

There are some reasons to explain why the League of Nations failed to maintain peace. The lack of support from the great powers was one of the main reasons. The U.S. adopted isolationism and refused to join the League after its establishment. The Soviet Union did not join until 1934 because it was a communist state which was not welcomed by non-communist states. Germany joined it in 1926 but withdrew in 1933 when Hitler started its expansion. Amongst the four permanent members, Japan and Italy withdrew in the 1930s because they wanted to practice their expansionist policy. In other words, Britain and France were the only two powers leading the League of Nations, but they had different views on how to maintain peace and they were under economic difficulties after the war. Hence, they could not wholeheartedly support the League of Nations. Therefore, the aggressors could start their expansion without restriction and it led to the outbreak of the Second World War.

In addition, there are some weaknesses on the internal system of the League of Nations. For example, a unanimous agreement of every issue had to be made before taking any action. However, the members of the League were not wholehearted in maintaining peace. They strived for their own interests in the League and hence made a unanimous agreement impossible. The League also had no military force and economic resources to implement the decision made. It could only condemn the aggressive actions of ambitious powers or imposed economic sanction. For example, when Italy invaded Abyssinia in 1935, France continued the trading relations with Italy even though it was a leading member in the organization. Finally, the League could do nothing to the withdrawal of members. The League of Nations had no real power to maintain collective peace. Most of the nations used their own way to settle their disputes.

In conclusion, as the first international organization to maintain collective peace, the League of Nations made the first step to achieve the goal of building up an international organ to solve problems among countries. However, the lack of real authority and the lack of support from powerful nations undermined its effectiveness in maintaining peace.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    to those countries and provinces which suffered actual invasion by the enemy and Britain must review the treaty. Keynes also says that more prosperity would come by the aid of the United States with two financial proposals. First is the absolute cancellation of the debts between the allies.

  2. Why did the League of Nations fail to keep peace in the 1930's?

    As Germany had started the war, according to Versailles, one of her punishments was that she was not considered to be a member of the international community and, therefore, she was not invited to join. This was a great blow to Germany but it also meant that the League could

  1. Why the League of Nations Failed?

    The Council was a smaller group that met few times a year and for emergencies. It included permanent members which were Britain, France, Italy and Japan.

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    It proved that Athens showed no intentions of allowing the states to leave the alliance, or more specifically, to escape her leadership. This was also the first time in which Athens had used the power of League against a member state in private conflict.

  1. The League of Nations

    One must understand the history behind the League of Nations before judging it. In November of 1918 an armistice was declared in Europe. Wilson was more of an idealist than a war villain, and viewed this event as an opportunity for international peace.

  2. Post War Peace -even though Wilsons conception was considered idealistic, it was the best ...

    Wilson wanted Poland to be strong, and achieve self-determination by having access to the sea so they will be able to trade effectively and easily. However, he was concerned that if Poland was given a corridor through Germany, he would be forcing Germans to live outside Germany under Polish control- which Wilson definitely did not agree with.

  1. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    It was known as the Nazi-Soviet Pact. This agreement helped Hitler gain the comfort of not having to fight a war on both fronts, since he knew he would not last long if he did. Hitler hated communists, but knew that the only way he would stand a chance was with Stalin as an ally.

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    If the land was split, they would ultimately be under polish control. The Rhine border sparked a lot of controversy too. Many say that Clemenceau was crazy to think that he would be able to seize that part of land since it had been under German control for so long.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work