• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective were the suffragists and suffragettes.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective were the suffragists and suffragettes The suffragists and suffragettes campaigned for votes for women from 1906 to 1914. The suffragists campaigned politically, organising petitions, marches and meetings. The suffragettes were violent protesters, vandalising public property, private property, and men's affairs. But how effective were these campaigns, of violence and peace. The suffragist's greatest achievement was arguably the introduction of the conciliation bill. Whilst Asquith removed female suffrage from this bill, the prime minister, it was the only bill to pass completely through parliament without being blocked. This bill was undoubtedly influenced by the long campaigns of suffragists. A suffragist would probably not look back on this bill as their greatest achievement because if was eventually blocked and made no difference. ...read more.

Middle

Other achievements were also very large but not as effective because the government didn't want to give the vote to militants. Another great achievement of the suffragettes was the force-feeding campaign. This created huge amounts of sympathy for the suffragettes because force-feeding was a difficult and painful experience for the force fed, and the suffragettes exaggerated it ad exploited this endurance for sympathy. Many suffragettes would consider it a great achievement because it caused problems for the government in a militant manner. The suffragettes possibly damaged the campaign for female suffrage because the government vowed not to give in to militancy. ...read more.

Conclusion

This could have damaged the campaign because men would think that women acting as they were expected would not express their true views in an election and simply add more votes to the conservative party. The suffragette failures highly outweigh their achievements and the suffragist achievements were so little as to not affect the balance. The suffragettes damaged property and their campaign of violence put the government off female suffrage. It did raise the issue's importance as was intended but in the process reduced the need to pass the bill and instead increased the need to deal with the violence. By not giving in to suffragettes the government created an image that discouraged Irish nationalists and other people threatening violent campaigns. The suffragist campaign was not violent and so didn't create any problem or urgency for the bill to pass. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate starts well, with a good clear introduction setting the outline for the rest of the essay, and covering some basic knowledge and dates to show they have a general understanding and give a good first impression. He/She covers ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate starts well, with a good clear introduction setting the outline for the rest of the essay, and covering some basic knowledge and dates to show they have a general understanding and give a good first impression. He/She covers a range of ideas to answer the question, including specific evidence such as that of the Concilation Bill and Emily Davidson. In the second paragraph, he/she offers an opinion about the 'greatest achievement' and while offering an opinion and a judgement is excellent, to discuss what the suffragists/suffragettes in general would choose as their greatest achievement is probably not advisable, as it it making assumptions and an examiner may pick up on in and dislike it.

Level of analysis

The candidate develops all of the points sufficiently, using specific and detailed evidence well; examples of this include Emily Davidson again and the references to Asquith especially in paragraphs 2 and 3. This shows a depth of knowledge and understanding, and the ability to apply this knowledge appropriately to gain marks. The last paragraph could possibly do with some further development about the militancy of the suffragettes and the damaging effects it had. Possible points could include examples of exactly what they did, such as cutting works of art, pouring acid on golf courses, throwing a bomb at David Lloyd George, who was even a supporter of women's suffrage, and further detail on failures of the suffragettes; proving they weren't sensible/responsible enough, targeting the wrong areas, destroying support etc. A conclusion would also be very important, as it offers a judgement and a final overall answer to the question. Without this, it would be very difficult to get top marks.

Quality of writing

Mostly, the spelling and grammar seems good, apart from a few mistakes/typos, such as the use of a full stop instead of a question mark at the end of the first paragraph and 'if' instead of 'it'. The essay follows a good structure, permitting a balanced argument as it covers successes and failures of each groups respectively in order clearly and obviously. However, there is only one main factor in each section, and this could possibly be added to, depending on time restraints and word counts.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by happy_giggles 27/06/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    In conclusion we have three different interpretations on the British Empire Cecil Rhodes said that the empire was beneficial to all, cp hill said that it was only beneficial for Britain and Richard Gotts said it had negative impacts on both sides.

  2. Why was the Edwardian times a 'golden age'?

    He also discovered that 40% of citizens in York earned less than this. All of this was evident in the enlistment for the Boer War where 50% of the volunteers were sent back home for malnutrition. They received no help, or had no voice in the government.

  1. Who were more effective in gaining women rights, suffragists? Or suffragettes?

    In conclusion, I believe the suffragists and suffragettes were only effective to a small extent. However, I believe that the suffragettes were more effective than the suffragists were. My main reason for saying this is due to the time in history that the suffragists and suffragettes were at.

  2. Extended essay - women

    They were designed to undermine the stereotypical view that women were disorganised, irrational and politically illiterate. These tactics won over many politicians such as Disraeli and Lloyd George, who both expressed support towards women. The Suffragists campaign was pretty successful pre-1914, as is evident from the 1911 Conciliation Bill.

  1. How democratic had Britain become by 1928.

    In 1867 the Conservative government introduced the Parliamentary Reform Act which increased the electorate to almost 2.5 million. It gave the vote to the cities' working class. However, the Act did not alter the balance of political power in Britain.

  2. Votes for Women

    be, and yet not lose the vote" the may in the phrase shows that the Suffragettes weren't saying for a fact that all women and men had these jobs, they were just implying that they had these job, or that they might be able to have these jobs if they had a chance.

  1. The Changing roles of women

    It meant that women could finally control how long of their lives they spent looking after children. They could therefore plan their careers more systematically, and in their relationship with men the Pill gave women a greater sense of freedom and equality.

  2. How much did the CID improve investigative policing in the years 1880-1950?

    ?I have to suggest that our CID should be in more constant communication with yours about the W[hitechapel] murders?. (4) This quote suggests that during the killings, there was little contact between the CID and the Police. As a result of this, the CID hardly improved investigative policing as if there is no communication then nothing would be solved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work