• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801-1921? (44 marks)

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework (Unit 5): Part B (Option A) How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years 1801-1921? (44 marks) The extent that leaders were able to further the Irish cause was dependent on various factors including the degree of opposition or support within Ireland as well as economic and political aspects. While these factors were beyond the control of both Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders, the diverse methods they adopted to advance their respective causes also heavily influenced their effectiveness. The first leading figure in the period was O'Connell. He was effective in gaining mass support (especially from conservative Catholics) by setting up the Catholic Association in 1823, reducing membership to a penny a month by the introduction of Catholic Rent and due to his skills as an orator. Hoppen argues that the chief reason for his eventual success was his effective politicisation of the Catholic priesthood. It may be argued that the 1829 Emancipation was passed due to O'Connell encouraging peaceful agitation and gaining mass support, as conservative Catholicism pressurized Peel's government to fear a revolution in Ireland. ...read more.


Furthermore, Butt's weak leadership made him unable to inspire his followers and he was often away from the Commons pursuing his legal career. Finally, his conservatism frustrated more radical members and caused his downfall before he was able to have any significant effect except arguing Westminster lacked the time and expertise to govern Ireland. In the late nineteenth century, nationalism was led by Parnell, whose contempt for English opinion made him a popular hero for militant Irish nationalists and while he rejected the use of violence, Fenians were willing to co-operate with him. Furthermore, E. Norman argues that people like Davitt, the Land Leaguers and Parnell were effective as they "exploited the [rural] disorders for political purposes". Additionally, Lyons argues that Parnell was effective in "fusing into one national movement all the elements of Irish protest and grievance" by the 'New Departure'. The work of Parnell, Davitt and the Land Leaguers eventually culminated in the Second Land Act of 1881 which was valuable as it delivered the 3F's to tenants. Thus, Parnell had effectively forced the government into land reform by encouraging peaceful protests, boycotts and rural agitation. ...read more.


Griffith and Collins's effectiveness as negotiators was also limited as they did not know how much authority they had and were forced into the Treaty by Lloyd George's threat of war. However, the Treaty was not an unmitigated failure: it effectively gave Ireland the status of a self governing Dominion that controlled its own internal affairs and the oath to the Crown was watered down. Thus, Sinn Fein's militant tactics combined with Griffith and de Valera's political compromise effectively achieved change quickly. Overall, it emerges that the Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders were more effective in advancing their different 'causes' in some periods than others. O'Connell's initial 'cause' was the Catholic people whom he helped by the 1829 Catholic Emancipation. However, following this, he, Young Ireland and the Fenians failed to gain Home Rule which suggests this period was less effective. Parnell was effective in advancing the 'cause' for farmers and in achieving Home Rule bills. Historians have argued that the effectiveness of the leaders was largely dictated by changing circumstances (factors such as public opinion and the attitudes of British politicians). This may explain why after 1916, the nationalist 'cause' was advanced most quickly under Sinn Fein, de Valera, Griffith and others (by the 1921 Treaty) and why Ulster Unionists failed to maintain the Union. (Word Count: 1,912 words) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    People were angry and believed the volunteers should be punished. 1916 The British government set out to destroy revolutionary nationalism 'root and branch' There were wholesale arrests and deportations. Around 3000 Irish men and women were arrested, 1,500 were quickly released, 160 were jailed and the rest interned in England and Wales.

  2. How far do these sources support the veiw that Irish Nationalism was a 'curious ...

    and thus remain popular, in c1916 the blend was one of violence and extremism. The previous condemnations by the Roman Catolic Church about organistaions such as Sinn Fein disappeared and they remained ambiguous in their silence. This almost justified Sinn Fein and meant that it helpeg to gain the popular

  1. The 1913 lockout, 1916 rising, the treaty of 1921 and the causes of the ...

    While this was happening a German boat called "The Aud" arrived off the Old Head of Kinsale with Captain Spindler in charge. But the volunteers who drove down from Dublin didn't know the area very well and ended up driving straight into the harbour as they couldn't see threw thick fog.

  2. How far do the sources support the view that Irish Nationalism was an 'increasingly ...

    It collapsed because some of its leaders were seen as working for their own gains, rather than those of the League - another example of ineffective leadership. The next phase of the national movement saw a fierce repudiation of constitutionalism (Lyons).

  1. Ireland 1801-1921

    The historian J.C Beckett argues, 'The rapid progress of the Catholic Association alarmed the government; and this alarm was increased, and in some measure justified, by the violent language that O'Connell regularly employed'.1 Beckett's view is very accurate in light of the culmination of O'Connell's Emancipation campaign.

  2. How Effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders advance their Cause in the years ...

    O'Connell regarded the Catholic Church as important, because priests could collect rent and they could spread the message in an effective way. Twenty thousand pounds was collected in the first nine months and another thirty-five thousand pounds over the next three years.

  1. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    O' Connell, the Association and the Catholic Church in 1828 ran and won the County Clare Election however O' Connell could not sit in parliament forcing the Duke of Wellington, to change the law thus granting Catholic Emancipation. O' Connell had now opened the opportunities for Catholic's to gain posts

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    The Irish temporalities Act in 1831 got rid of ten Anglican Bishoprics in Ireland , but whether or not this can be seen as a real success for O'Connell is debatable, as it did not really advance the movement in any great way, but it revitalised the movement adding hope to it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work