• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively did the Liberals help children, the old and the unemployed?

Extracts from this document...


History Homework How effectively did the Liberals help children, the old and the unemployed? In this essay I am going to state how effectively the Liberals helped children, the old and the unemployed in the early nineteen hundreds. Help was needed for these particular groups of people because when one member of the family could not work, then the whole family was affected; children became malnourished, and the old, the unemployed and the sick could not support their families with any money to even afford the basic essentials needed to survive. Rowntree?s research in York and Booth?s research in London proved that these people needed help, the children in particular. Rowntree?s findings showed 10% of the people in York lived in primary poverty and 18% in secondary poverty. Rowntree observed families missing meals as they had to spend the money for food on children?s clothing, this is how children and adults became malnourished. Before the Liberals took notice of the children, a number of charities offered help to children, but the scale of the problem was too large and it just resulted in orphans being put into workhouses where they had to work all day in cramped conditions, only being rewarded with very basic, cheap meals. ...read more.


Children’s homes had to be registered under this act and children were also given their own young offenders institutions to be held in rather than going to normal adult prisons where inmates could lead young offenders astray. This act was also the start of not being allowed to sell tobacco and alcohol to under 16’s. Before help was given to the elderly by Liberal reforms, they received help from family members, charities or if this was not possible they were sent to the workhouses. The 1908 Pensions Act was a welcome relief to the poor however the wealthy people did not agree with the pensions act. Pensions insured a person over 70 with no other income could receive a total of 5 shillings a week. The pension was good because it was non-contributory which meant that the elderly did not have to put money in to get it, by 1914 there were almost 1 million claimants. Even though the Pensions Act was passed in 1908 it did not come into effect until January 1909. There were a lot of terms and conditions for the pension; people earning £31per year were not eligible for the pension, also widows and families were not paid pensions and you had to have lived in Britain for 20 years to receive it. ...read more.


Lastly the National Insurance Act (Part 2) came into effect. In certain trades such as ship building you could receive only 7s for 15 weeks per year when you were unemployed if you payed in 2½d per week. There were weekly contributions from the employee, employer and government this way. Yet again with this act they did not provide enough, although this was done deliberately to encourage saving. With this act you also had to be registered at labour exchange in order to get the benefit. To conclude, I think the sick and unemployed/underemployed were given the least help because the reforms that were put into place to help them were full of terms and conditions; I feel this slightly defeated the goal of trying to help these vulnerable people. I think the group that needed the most help were the children because they did not cause poverty for themselves it was thrust upon them as they were born into it and I feel they rightly got the most help. Four acts and reforms were put in place for children and after adjustment they worked very successfully. I am also glad the elderly were happy with their pensions but I do still feel the sick and unemployed/underemployed deserved more help. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why did the Liberals decline between 1908-1918?

    Ramsay MacDonald allowed cartoons to be published of the force feeding that was going on in the prisons. These showed how the Liberals were basically abusing these women. Therefore when the women received the vote they voted for Labour as they had helped them and were sympathetic towards them.

  2. History Revision for year 11. The Liberal Reforms, the Beveridge Reforms and the ...

    The school leaving age had just been raised to twelve and teachers wrote in to their pupils were too tired to work and were unable to stay awake in class. The Labour Party In 1900 a new political party was set up, it was called the Labour Representation Council, but changed its name to the Labour Party in 1906.

  1. The nation(TM)s old ways of life and thought perished in the mud of Flanders

    Here Marwick clearly states that it was during the war that the Labour party was rising. Due to Labour getting votes that would previously have gone to the Liberals. Conclusion; I believe that the rise of the Labour Party was not due to World War 1 but due to the

  2. Why did Children Work in the Mills

    from a work house in London. He also built cottages worth �100 for them and spent �300 for accommodation for the 90 apprentices. Furthermore Greg also paid them �2-�4 and gave them 2 shifts, 2 stockings and 2 aprons. In addition to, children were well looked after.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work