• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How fair was the treaty of Versailles?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How fair was the treaty of Versailles? The bloody war ended in 1918 when peace was called by Germany. It was not until 1919 when peace talks had begun in Paris. The treaty was harsh on the Germans but the allies felt secure about this, that Germany was no longer a threat in Europe. At this point it would be difficult to say that what the allies said in the treaty would be different after a few years after the war. Would the treaty still be the same if they wrote it after a few years after the war? The war had a major impact on he allies and losses were very high. At this time the allies would be looking for revenge on Germany for the high casualties and destruction that German shells pounded on French soil. The treaty could have been different if it was written at a latter date and could not have been too Harsh on Germany. Woodrow Wilson the American President aimed to secure a peace based on the Fourteen Points. A peace that would be based on justice, which would be maintained by a new international organization called the League of Nations. Wilson did agree that Germany needed to be punished for starting the war, but he wanted the punishment to be fair. David Lloyd-George the British Prime Minister was in a difficult position. Britain had suffered huge casualties in the war and the general public was demanding revenge. ...read more.

Middle

. This was to cause great bitterness amongst the Germans as many Germans were in these territories. This also cut East Prussia off from the rest of Germany making it even weaker than it had hopped. Also the Baltic States were given back to their rightful owners which were annexed by Germany when Russia pulled out of the war suffering economically and male population decrease. The city called Danzig which was a famous and a rich port for Germany was also lost as Posen was given to Poland. France had wanted this city to be given to Poland but Lloyd George disagreed with this and was turned into a free city. Germany has already lost masses of land and also major industries cut off from Germany. This makes Germany vulnerable as it is so weak and can not afford to pay such huge reparations. It is fair for the allies and especially Britain because Britain has control over sea incase of an attack and still has the Largest Navy in the world. Britain had to be reassured that Germany is no longer a threat at sea. Germany was made even weaker as the allies decided that Germany can no longer make an alliance with any country in fear it may grow strong again. There was to be no treaty or an alliance between Germany and Austria. The treaty forbids this to happen in case Germany rises into a new powerful nation. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was an act of defiance and disgust at the Treaty. At this stage Germany is weak on all fronts and can not secure its borders from attack. To make things worse the German air force was abandoned because of the devastation it can cause. The main reason was that none of the allies would want German planes to have access around the world. The allies thought this to be a threat and did not want German planes bombing cities. This is fair for the allies because they knew now that Germany can not attack Britain and USA by the navy or air force. It is unfair that the air force was abandoned because the air force would allow mobility with small troops. Germany cans no longer transfer troops quickly from one border from another. Germany also feels vulnerable from air attack from Britain and France. Germany could argue that they were allowed to have an air force but to restrict its mobility and only allowed above German territory. The allies at this stage have no choice as technology was weak and they did not have a powerful radar that could detect if a plane coming toward Britain was from Germany or was it their own. The allies had no choice but to abandon it in total. A control commission was set up to police these arrangements. The treaty had state that Germany was been disarmed for security reasons for the allies. I think that it was right for Germany to be slightly disarmed but not to such a extent that it will weaken Germany and make it feel insecure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles fair to Germany?

    5 star(s)

    The Saar was German speaking and had a plentiful supply of coal, and Upper Silesia contained key iron and coal resources. Meanwhile, as Germany was losing land, the British and French were increasing their empires by taking control of German and Turkish territories in Africa and the Middle East.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Why did the treaty of versailles provoke widespread hostility among Germans?

    4 star(s)

    As Keynes says: "The German Empire had been built more truly on coal and iron than on blood and iron." This clause had a duel effect as it made German rearmament less likely; it also made repayments of reparartions less likely.

  1. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    I think this was totally unfair on Germany, perhaps if they had of been allowed to join from the beginning there would not have been such problem s between the countries later on because they would have had communication between them.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    fair; this is mainly because the winning side of the war decided the treaty. Obviously the winners of the war were going to be harsh on the losers, they would want to make sure that the losers were totally crushed so that another war could not be started, they only

  1. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    as Austria would have to be integrated into Germany and become part of Germany and hence gaining more land for Germany. �A vigorous nation will always find ways of adopting its territory to its population size.� Hitler was at an advantage as he had the treaty of Versailles acting as a scapegoat.

  2. 'How and Why did the Treaty of Versailles differ from Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points?'

    Treaty of Versailles apart from the existence of the League of Nations. There weren't many similarities but there were quite a few differences between the two documents. Not many of Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points had managed to fully make there presence in the Treaty of Versailles, for example, the Wilson

  1. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    Lastly, they wanted an alliance with Poland so at times of need they could combat any German uprisal. France also had motives that they would not openly speak of. They wanted revenge for their country and their people. Secondly, they wanted their empire to gain from the treaty.

  2. WHY WAS GERMANY SO DISCONTENTED WITH THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    of where the Germans and Austrians regarded each other as one nationality and according to Wilson's National Self-Determination pledge, should be allowed to merge as one. The loss of German territory was severe hit to them. The Germans hated the fact they were now divided from East Prussia by the Polish Corridor and had lost an import port (Danzig)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work