• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far by 1941, had the Soviet economy benefited from changes in agricultural policy since 1928?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far by 1941, had the soviet economy benefited from changes in soviet agriculture policy since 1928? Collectivisation in the Soviet Union was enforced under Stalin between 1928 and 1940. The goal of this policy was to consolidate individual land and labour into collective farms. The Soviet leadership was confident that the replacement of individual peasant farms by kolkhozy would immediately increase the food supply for urban populations, the supply of raw materials for processing industry, and agricultural exports. Collectivisation was therefore regarded as the solution to the crisis of agricultural distribution mainly in grain deliveries that had developed since 1927. This essay will focus on how far collectivisation benefited the economy since 1928-1941. At the start of Collectivisation the economic benefits were apparent, there was ?growing sophistication of the peasant women? as women learnt to read and there was ?large scale industrialised farming.? This is what source A thinks as source A is an account of collectivisation by a Left wing American Journalist who visited Russia in 1930. Source A gives us a few ideas of the impact of agricultural policy because it refers to the early period of collectivisation. In the 1930s collectivisation was seen as positive as there was ?large scale industrial farming? and there were ?unmistakable signs of the approaching civilisation in the Russian village?. ...read more.

Middle

Source B was right to say that many peasants ?were psychologically unprepared to become members of collective farms.? Source B does show us that the collective farms were successful but it criticises the way they were run. This is evident when it says ?some over enthusiastic officials forced peasants into joining giant collective farms which were unmanageable. Some middle class peasants were mistakenly lumped together with kulaks.? He admits that there were failures but he does not blame the communists this is because it was written in 1981 when the communist party still controlled the Soviet Union. During the period of 1928-1941, the first second and third five year plans were introduced. These plans were introduced to put central planning at the forefront of the soviet economy. The key features of the plans were the setting of production and output targets which industrial enterprises had to achieve. The plans also set targets to key industries. There were many failures and successes of the five year plans. The first five year plan benefitted the economy as there was increased production and output in electricity (which had trebled), coal, iron, steel (which had doubled) and steel increased by one third. Huge new industries complexes were also built and new tractors were built in Stalingrad and other places to meet the needs of mechanised agriculture. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore peasants remained unenthusiastic and agriculture remained inefficient as ?collectivisation reduced food output to below the 1928 level, resulting in overall reductions in output.? Some say this was a worse performance than 1913 tsarist Russia! Therefore in conclusion the soviet economy has benefited from changes in soviet agricultural policy as there was huge industrialisation, women became more educated and the peasantry way of living changed. At the time where mass industrialisation was needed and needed to be done fast I think that collectivisation was probably the only way to get the grain that they needed. On the other hand I do believe that the soviet economy did not benefit from changes in soviet agriculture policy as there was a huge famine where 7 million peasants died. The Kulaks were exterminated and the economy was not benefitting as the peasants were protesting and had no incentive to work. There was a shortage of new machinery and not enough grain was being produced. A lot of peasants hoarded their grain. Also because a lot of grain was being exported there was not enough for the peasants to eat. This is therefore why I believe that the economy did not benefit that much, although there were benefits to the economy there were a lot more disadvantages and it took a lot of time for the economy to get over collectivisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    Although almost everyone in Russia was employed, it was usually in very unsafe factories, construction sites or on farms. Safety conditions were terrible and from all the factors covered above, I think that although the five-year plans brought quite a lot of glory and greatness to Russia, the people did suffer quite badly.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    To crackdown against rivals, Stalin needed more than Nikolayev as the murderer of Kirov. The NKVD declared that Nikolayev and the Zinovievite group in Leningrad had conspired together to murder Kirov and to murder also Stalin, Molotov and Kaganovich. The arrested Zinovievites confessed to belonging to a group but not

  1. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    attempt to retain Stalin's image as a 'great planner' the communists denied the existence of the famine to outside nations. Leading to the 'sacrifice' of many to save the reputation of Communism, but primarily Stalin. This, added to the isolationist attitude of 'socialism in one country' meant that aid from capitalist nations could not be applied for.

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    Even the fact that a first tractor play existed illustrates the intent of soviet propaganda machine. These sources do not have an accurate portrayal as they do not collate with photos of the events of chaos and famine. Even by his own admissions Stalin thought collectivisation was going badly at the time and was chaotic.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    However, he was permitted to keep his Party membership at the personal request of Mao. On 9th September, 1976, Mao himself died. Mao's death was not exactly unexpected, but nonetheless, the reality of it hit the country hard. Where China was to go, and who was to lead her was the burning question.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    We have never cherished the hope that we could finish it without the aid of the international proletariat. We never had any illusions on that score´┐Ż The final victory of socialism in a single country is of course impossible. Our contingent of workers and peasants which is upholding Soviet power

  1. USSR in the 1930's.

    In 1956, Khrushchev was the first Russian leader to openly criticise Stalin's ruling technique, and this was three years after his death.

  2. 'The Soviet Sate was established at the expense of the Soviet people' Examine the ...

    These ranged from peasants who opposed the policy of collectivization to intellectuals and writers who criticized the government. Stalin claimed these people would be cleansed of their anti-social views by undertaking useful employment. They worked as slave labour building roads, bridges and canals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work