• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far by 1941, had the Soviet economy benefited from changes in agricultural policy since 1928?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How far by 1941, had the soviet economy benefited from changes in soviet agriculture policy since 1928? Collectivisation in the Soviet Union was enforced under Stalin between 1928 and 1940. The goal of this policy was to consolidate individual land and labour into collective farms. The Soviet leadership was confident that the replacement of individual peasant farms by kolkhozy would immediately increase the food supply for urban populations, the supply of raw materials for processing industry, and agricultural exports. Collectivisation was therefore regarded as the solution to the crisis of agricultural distribution mainly in grain deliveries that had developed since 1927. This essay will focus on how far collectivisation benefited the economy since 1928-1941. At the start of Collectivisation the economic benefits were apparent, there was ?growing sophistication of the peasant women? as women learnt to read and there was ?large scale industrialised farming.? This is what source A thinks as source A is an account of collectivisation by a Left wing American Journalist who visited Russia in 1930. Source A gives us a few ideas of the impact of agricultural policy because it refers to the early period of collectivisation. In the 1930s collectivisation was seen as positive as there was ?large scale industrial farming? and there were ?unmistakable signs of the approaching civilisation in the Russian village?. ...read more.


Source B was right to say that many peasants ?were psychologically unprepared to become members of collective farms.? Source B does show us that the collective farms were successful but it criticises the way they were run. This is evident when it says ?some over enthusiastic officials forced peasants into joining giant collective farms which were unmanageable. Some middle class peasants were mistakenly lumped together with kulaks.? He admits that there were failures but he does not blame the communists this is because it was written in 1981 when the communist party still controlled the Soviet Union. During the period of 1928-1941, the first second and third five year plans were introduced. These plans were introduced to put central planning at the forefront of the soviet economy. The key features of the plans were the setting of production and output targets which industrial enterprises had to achieve. The plans also set targets to key industries. There were many failures and successes of the five year plans. The first five year plan benefitted the economy as there was increased production and output in electricity (which had trebled), coal, iron, steel (which had doubled) and steel increased by one third. Huge new industries complexes were also built and new tractors were built in Stalingrad and other places to meet the needs of mechanised agriculture. ...read more.


Therefore peasants remained unenthusiastic and agriculture remained inefficient as ?collectivisation reduced food output to below the 1928 level, resulting in overall reductions in output.? Some say this was a worse performance than 1913 tsarist Russia! Therefore in conclusion the soviet economy has benefited from changes in soviet agricultural policy as there was huge industrialisation, women became more educated and the peasantry way of living changed. At the time where mass industrialisation was needed and needed to be done fast I think that collectivisation was probably the only way to get the grain that they needed. On the other hand I do believe that the soviet economy did not benefit from changes in soviet agriculture policy as there was a huge famine where 7 million peasants died. The Kulaks were exterminated and the economy was not benefitting as the peasants were protesting and had no incentive to work. There was a shortage of new machinery and not enough grain was being produced. A lot of peasants hoarded their grain. Also because a lot of grain was being exported there was not enough for the peasants to eat. This is therefore why I believe that the economy did not benefit that much, although there were benefits to the economy there were a lot more disadvantages and it took a lot of time for the economy to get over collectivisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    workers were forced to change jobs a lot which caused a great deal of instability in their lives and in most cases, working conditions were very poor indeed. Although collectivisation may seem like quite a good idea to people who weren't farmers, most farmers in Russia hated it.

  2. Explain why by 1928, the Soviet leadership had decided on collectivisation of agriculture?

    Problems then incurred with this during the 'grain procurement' crisis of 1928-1929. Stalin also wished to band all individuals together into one class, he therefore set out to disband and destroy the 'Kulaks' the Soviet middle class (Anyone who can afford to employ someone for more than six months a year.)

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Jiang Qing tried to convince Hua Guofeng to support her bid to be Party Chairwoman. He decided against it, and was himself elected Party Chairman. In a radical step, he had the Gang of Four arrested on evidence that they had military coups planned in Beijing and Shanghai.

  2. Between 1928 and 1941 Stalin had a huge effect on Russia.

    However the Tsar wasn't there, as he had left previously. Trouble brewed up in the protestors, and they were met by soldiers and mounted Cossacks. Without warning, the soldiers fired and the Cossacks charged. What resulted was lots of bloodshed.

  1. To what extent were the people of the Soviet Union better off in 1941 ...

    This allowed many peasants to leave their farms and start work in factories in the towns, which was what Stalin intended. Ninety percent of produce made by each collective was sold straight to the state at a fixed price. In return the state made farming equipment freely available.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Franklin D. Roosevelt even had opponents from within his own party. His main opponent in the Democratic Party was Senator Huey Long of Louisiana. Alden P Hatch tells us: "Long was a shameless politician who played on people's prejudices. He was a creature without morals or honour.

  1. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    alone, hoping to benefit from increased visibly and by putting themselves at the forefront of the assault against capitalism. Bukharin and his followers, past supporters of peasant free enterprise, were persecuted. And Stalin's wife committed suicide with the pistol she had been given for her self-protection.

  2. To what extent was Stalin's economic policy successful? In the 1920's the soviet economy ...

    The reliably of these sources is questionable due to the mystery of its creation. Furthermore the fact that there were many first tractor sources shows that it wasn't one artist's idea but a soviet propaganda one. Therefore removing the individuality of the painting therefore it would not be an observation but a manipulated picture.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work