• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Did Russia Change between 1856 and 1894

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Did Russia Change between 1856 and 1994? During the years of 1856 and 1894, Russia changed immensely in its policies and general state. It went from being an ageing superpower into a country with internal problems and an ambience of civilian unrest. Alexander II realised the need to modernise Russia in order to prolong their status as a superpower. This stemmed from their defeat in the Crimean war. To modernise and industrialise Russia, a free workforce was needed and this could only be made available if people were freed from the land. This meant that Alexander II would need to somehow release the serfs from their owner's land. Another reason for emancipation was made clear in a quote from Alexander II in March 1856: "It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below". ...read more.

Middle

In conclusion, Russia made a great deal of progress during Alexander II's reign as they began to lay the foundations for creating a new, more powerful Russia. However, not all of Russia's problems were solved and indeed some of the reforms created new problems. But generally, Russia changed a great deal during Alexander II's reign and the majority of change was constructive. Alexander III was faced with a number of dilemmas when he came to power. The assassination of his father had a huge impact on him. He believed that all attempts at reform were futile and so followed a policy of counter-reform. His repressive measures became known as "the Reaction". Some examples include Russification, where national minority influence was limited and the Statue of State Security, where judges, magistrates and officials sympathetic to liberal ideology were removed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both Alexander II and Alexander III decided to change Russia in a bid to prolong autocracy. Despite the reform and counter-reform taking place in Russia, some aspects of life stayed the same. Generally in Russia, there was some kind of repression occurring. Although the Duma was meant to represent the people of Russia, the tsar still had the power to simply over rule any decisions. Also, the average peasant life was not much better than pre emancipation as they were crippled by redemption payments. In conclusion, Russia changed immensely between 1856 and 1894. When recognised as being an ageing superpower by Alexander II it was inevitable that some sort of change would take place in Russia in the hope of modernisation. We can see that the changes were mostly political and economical. During Alexander III's reign we can see that the changes were suppressive although it ultimately led to further change in the form of revolution in the future. ADAM KHANCHE ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why and with what results did Alexander II abolish serfdom in Russia?

    The Tsar feared a revolution from the serfs; however, he also wanted to protect the autocracy. Instead of emancipating from the position of "tsar liberator", he did it from the decisively conservative and selfish stance of not wanting anything to interfere with or even overthrow the autocracy, or jeopardize his position and the divine rights of the tsar.

  2. 'Only Alexander II's policies made significant progress in avoiding revolution in Russia.' How valid ...

    It is clear that Alexander clearly thought a liberal approach was the key to avoiding a revolution, yet the extent to which this was a success is debatable. When in 1881 he was assassinated by members of the small terrorist group, the People's Will, there were many active revolutionary groups around.

  1. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    with tax payments, they could stand to loose their land and home to the State. In many cases, the taxes levied was much higher than the value of the land and due to the interest rates of 6%, many peasants found it almost impossible ever to erase the debt.

  2. How valid is the view that the reign of, Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    Another area that Alexander concentrated on was the army. Badly in need of reform after the defeats inflicted upon it by the Crimean War of 1854-56, Alexander initiated groundbreaking new measures to improve Russia's military capability. These were overseen primarily by Minister of War, Dimitry Milyutin He cut the "life sentence" service period from twenty-five years to only six.

  1. How successful was Tsar Alexander 2nd in Solving the problems facing Russia During his ...

    It was not only the social aspects of Russia which were suffering, the agricultural Industry was at an all time low, with only 50% of all the farm production sold as surface goods. This low output of goods crippled the Russian economy, and as a result many Nobles were facing Bankruptcy.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    In 1932, there were 500,000 US civil servants. By 1939 there was be 920,000. Franklin D. Roosevelt's enemies also argued that parts of the New Deal were morally wrong. For instance the Agricultural Adjustment Administration's policies meant that thousands of farmers were paid to destroy their crops and plough them

  1. History - Russia

    However, Source C comes from 1924, six years later than Sources A and B. As a consequence of this, the Sergeyev's findings could potentially have been distorted in the fullness of time. Conversely, there are also a few similarities - for instance, Sources A and B both agree that the

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    The Soviet regime is passing through a preparatory stage, importing, borrowing and appropriating the technical and cultural conquests of the West." (Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed, p. 20.) Since that time, the Soviet economy advanced with seven league boots. In the 50 years from 1913 (the height of prewar production)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work