• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Did Russia Change between 1856 and 1894

Extracts from this document...


How Far Did Russia Change between 1856 and 1994? During the years of 1856 and 1894, Russia changed immensely in its policies and general state. It went from being an ageing superpower into a country with internal problems and an ambience of civilian unrest. Alexander II realised the need to modernise Russia in order to prolong their status as a superpower. This stemmed from their defeat in the Crimean war. To modernise and industrialise Russia, a free workforce was needed and this could only be made available if people were freed from the land. This meant that Alexander II would need to somehow release the serfs from their owner's land. Another reason for emancipation was made clear in a quote from Alexander II in March 1856: "It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below". ...read more.


In conclusion, Russia made a great deal of progress during Alexander II's reign as they began to lay the foundations for creating a new, more powerful Russia. However, not all of Russia's problems were solved and indeed some of the reforms created new problems. But generally, Russia changed a great deal during Alexander II's reign and the majority of change was constructive. Alexander III was faced with a number of dilemmas when he came to power. The assassination of his father had a huge impact on him. He believed that all attempts at reform were futile and so followed a policy of counter-reform. His repressive measures became known as "the Reaction". Some examples include Russification, where national minority influence was limited and the Statue of State Security, where judges, magistrates and officials sympathetic to liberal ideology were removed. ...read more.


Both Alexander II and Alexander III decided to change Russia in a bid to prolong autocracy. Despite the reform and counter-reform taking place in Russia, some aspects of life stayed the same. Generally in Russia, there was some kind of repression occurring. Although the Duma was meant to represent the people of Russia, the tsar still had the power to simply over rule any decisions. Also, the average peasant life was not much better than pre emancipation as they were crippled by redemption payments. In conclusion, Russia changed immensely between 1856 and 1894. When recognised as being an ageing superpower by Alexander II it was inevitable that some sort of change would take place in Russia in the hope of modernisation. We can see that the changes were mostly political and economical. During Alexander III's reign we can see that the changes were suppressive although it ultimately led to further change in the form of revolution in the future. ADAM KHANCHE ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why and with what results did Alexander II abolish serfdom in Russia?

    The Tsar feared a revolution from the serfs; however, he also wanted to protect the autocracy. Instead of emancipating from the position of "tsar liberator", he did it from the decisively conservative and selfish stance of not wanting anything to interfere with or even overthrow the autocracy, or jeopardize his position and the divine rights of the tsar.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Franklin D. Roosevelt even had opponents from within his own party. His main opponent in the Democratic Party was Senator Huey Long of Louisiana. Alden P Hatch tells us: "Long was a shameless politician who played on people's prejudices. He was a creature without morals or honour.

  1. How successful was Tsar Alexander 2nd in Solving the problems facing Russia During his ...

    One of the last major problems facing Alexander 2nd as Tsar was the lack of efficient communication. This does not only mean the postal service, but also the state of the railway lines and amount of trains that were running.

  2. History - Russia

    This is because whilst they came from different sources, both giving different stories, some pieces of the stories are undeniable. For instance, a large quantity of blood was found in the lower story of the house, whereas nothing was found elsewhere.

  1. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    This, although not overly harsh since they had to be paid for 49 years so serfs were secure in the knowledge that their lands would safely be passed on to their children, did have flaws - if a "bread-winning" family member fell ill or died and the family fell behind

  2. 'To What Extent Did Tsar Alexander III's Reign Mark A Major Change From That ...

    and as the...lack of revolutionary outrage lengthened...the guards...grew bored of waiting for something to happen.' Both Tsar Alexander II and Tsar Alexander III had begun their reigns in times of great national crisis. Tsar Alexander II was faced with the disastrous and highly embarrassing showing of the Russian army in

  1. 'Only Alexander II's policies made significant progress in avoiding revolution in Russia.' How valid ...

    Indeed, as the article in the History Review goes on to say: 'However, [the reforms were] accompanied by a changing and underlying pattern of social tensions.' In local government reforms which followed there certainly seems evidence that he did intend to alter Russia system of government ever so slightly.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    In other words, within a few decades, on the basis of a nationalised economy, the Soviet Union was transformed from a backward agricultural economy into the second most powerful nation on earth, with a mighty industrial base, a high cultural level and more scientists than the USA and Japan combined.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work